Rep. Swalwell: Impeachment over Roger Stone intervention an option

FILE – In this Jan. 29, 2019 file photo, former campaign adviser for President Donald Trump, Roger Stone arrives at Federal Court in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 10:12 AM PT — Thursday, February 13, 2020

According to congressman Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), impeachment is still not off the table after the Justice Department intervened on behalf of Republican operative Roger Stone.

In an interview Wednesday, the California lawmaker said he agreed with Stone’s sentence and he shouldn’t be treated differently than anyone else who went to trial.

Swalwell said he’s concerned about the ability of judges and prosecutors to work independently. He added, ultimately it will be up to the voters in November. However, impeachment over the Stone issue is still an option.

“We don’t wake up in the morning wanting to impeach him,” stated Swalwell. “…but we’re not going to let him just torch this democracy because he thinks that he’s been let off once and we’re not going to do something about it.”

Democrats have reportedly called for new investigations and oversight into President Trump, but they are ultimately struggling to figure out what to do next after their impeachment effort failed last week.

RELATED: President Trump On Stone Pardon: I Don’t Want To Talk About That Yet

Original Article

Eric Swalwell’s Trump comment on CNN sparks Twitter furor: ‘We can only conclude that you’re guilty’

closeFox News Flash top headlines for Dec. 18Video

Fox News Flash top headlines for Dec. 18

Fox News Flash top headlines for Dec. 18 are here. Check out what's clicking on

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., said Tuesday that if President Trump refuses to send the documents and witnesses that House Democrats requested in the impeachment inquiry, “We can only conclude that you’re guilty,” sparking critics on Twitter to accuse him of suggesting the president is guilty until proven innocent.

"In America, innocent men do not hide and conceal evidence," Swalwell added, in his conversation with CNN's Wolf Blitzer. "They are forthcoming and they want to cooperate and the president is acting like a very guilty person right now."

Among those objecting to Swalwell's remarks was Ben Williamson, communications director for Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C.

"I believe the Fifth Amendment was just repealed on live television," Williamson wrote.

In a Twitter message earlier Tuesday, Swalwell had compared what he described as Trump's stonewalling by using a sports metaphor of drug testing in Major League Baseball.


"[I]f a baseball player refuses to take a drug test, MLB treats it as a positive result. Why? Only a player who’d test dirty would refuse a test," he wrote. "Why won’t @realDonaldTrump send witnesses or documents to Congress? Because he’d test dirty."

But critics on Twitter weren't buying Swalwell's argument.

"Eric, odd thing about the US, you're innocent until proven guilty. Not his responsibility to prove he's innocent, your responsibility to prove he's guilty. Obviously you missed school that day!" one critic tweeted.

"guilty until proven innocent, the motto of the liberal miscreants like you," another wrote.

"Did you seriously just try to compare impeaching a president to a drug test in baseball? The idiocy is bleeding through my computer screen," a third Twitter user commented.

Trump has blocked several witnesses from testifying before Congress, including acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, former national security adviser John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.


The House is expected to vote on impeachment Wednesday.

Original Article