Ranked choice voting and the love-hate relationship both Democrats and Republicans have with it


Depending on who you ask, ranked choice voting can either reward extreme and wealthy candidates in elections or lead to a more publicly-palatable electoral process and encourage voter engagement.

The practice has grown in prevalence in recent elections – particularly in Alaska and Maine, plus Virginia, to some extent – entailing a hierarchical approach to election tallies. Several rounds of tabulation occur after voters are asked at the polls to choose their candidates in order of preference.

In the first round, totals for each candidate are tabulated, and the candidate with the fewest “first votes” is eliminated, and the “second votes” of that candidate’s supporters are added to the totals of the remaining candidates until a winner is decided.

A Republican former Alaska U.S. Senate candidate fell on the side of RCV critics, while a Republican former state lawmaker in Virginia credited it with leading to a political shakeup in his state. Democrats appeared similarly divided.

Democrats in Maine and New York have praised the system, while one Democratic governor appeared to throw up a potential roadblock in the way of his state’s implementation. He later stated that he would support the will of the people in a forthcoming ballot measure.

ALASKA SUES FEDS OVER ‘KNOWINGLY’ POLLUTED NATIVE LANDS

New Jersey ballot

A ballot drop box in Atlantic City (AP)

Ballot measures implementing or banning RCV will appear in Oregon, Alaska, Nevada, Missouri and Colorado. Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Kentucky also have pre-emptively banned RCV.

Former Virginia State Del. Chris Saxman, a Staunton Republican who is now executive director at the free-enterprise non-profit Virginia Free, told Fox News Digital that RCV worked in the selective way it was implemented in his state.

During the 2021 gubernatorial sweeps, Virginia Republicans utilized RCV in their primary candidate selection process, which led to Glenn Youngkin winning the nomination.

Virginia Republicans voted to hold a convention rather than a primary that year.

After Youngkin was selected, Saxman told Fox News Digital, a consultant approached him at the convention to complain that supporters of perceptibly more conservative candidates had been stymied from attacking the nominee.

GAS CRISIS: ALASKA GOVERNOR SAYS ‘BIDEN IS SEARCHING FOR OIL ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET EXCEPT AT HOME’

“If it wasn’t for this damned ranked choice voting, we could have gone after Youngkin harder, but we couldn’t afford to alienate his voters,” the consultant complained, according to Saxman.

“I was like, ‘So, it’s a problem not to attack a fellow Republican?’,” he said, citing former President Reagan’s noted rule.

Saxman said that situation showed there is value in nuanced reforms to elections like the way the party utilized RCV.

“Complex systems reward small change,” he said, going on to claim that because of the surgical way Virginia Republicans implemented RCV, it led to a political earthquake that November.

Saxman noted the GOP had been out of power in Richmond since the Bush era, but now, suddenly, Youngkin, Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears and Attorney General Jason Miyares supplanted the Democratic establishment.

Saxman said national fundraising groups had largely dismissed Virginia’s governor’s race as a lost cause, but in part thanks to RCV, funding poured in after the Youngkin-Sears-Miyares ticket was announced.

Separately, in New York City, then-Mayor Bill de Blasio celebrated 2021’s contest as the “biggest ranked choice voting election in America,” while many of the competitive races fell during the Democratic primary.

IN THE ONLY STATE BORDERING RUSSIA, ALASKA GOVERNOR SAYS DEFENSES ARE STRONG

On the other side of the country, however, Alaska Republicans appeared ready to dispense with the recently-implemented system, which many blamed for the election of Rep. Mary Peltola, D-Alaska, in a solidly red state as a replacement for the late five-decade GOP mainstay Don Young.

Proponents of RCV in Alaska said in multiple reports that the new system worked in the 2022 race there, in that Peltola – a liberal – Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, – a moderate – and Gov. Mike Dunleavy – a conservative, all won races in the same election.

But Kelly Tshibaka, a Republican who ran for Murkowski’s seat in the nonpartisan primary that year, told Fox News Digital that Alaskans were fooled by proponents of RCV who claimed it would take dark money and extremism out of elections.

She noted how Peltola had prevailed after facing Republicans Nick Begich III – scion of a famous Alaskan political family – and former Gov. Sarah Palin.

Tshibaka said she fully supports the effort to get rid of RCV in the Last Frontier, as its repeal is poised to be a statewide ballot initiative in November pending a legal challenge to the measure.

She pointed to the failed candidacy of Al Gross, a Democrat-turned-Independent who, at times, led in the primary but dropped out. Tshibaka claimed that Gross had been forced from the ballot to make way for Peltola, who was to his left – and therefore claims that RCV quells extremism are unfounded.

WHAT IS RANKED CHOICE VOTING, THE NEW ELECTION PROCESS USED IN ALASKA?

Gross said at the time it was “just too hard to run as a nonpartisan candidate in this race” and that the country was “broken.”

Tshibaka also argued that the system leads to a much smaller pool of voters ultimately electing a candidate as other votes are canceled out in tabulation rounds.

“So, it’s very deceptive on how they sell it to the public,” she said, adding that 2022 is largely seen as the most negative election in the state’s history despite RCV being sold to voters as a moderating force.

“We are baiting the water for negativity. You might have a one-off anecdote here or there. However, what we saw in Maine and Alaska … we’re seeing an increase in extreme negativity.”

Judy Eledge, a former schoolteacher in the Arctic oceanside community of Barrow – or Utqiagvik – who is active in Alaskan conservative circles, said the RCV system has shown to be very confusing to voters:

“You basically don’t get your first choice of who you want to win, and it enables people that otherwise would never win anything,” said Eledge. “It gives them enough to win and basically just destroys the party system within the state when it comes to elections.”

Eledge also claimed that it allows candidates who have substantial outside financial support a leg up, artificially influencing second and third choices.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Mary Peltola waving

Rep. Mary Peltola (D-AK) speaks to supporters at a watch party on November 8, 2022, in Anchorage, Alaska. (Getty Images )

In Maine, the implementation of RCV paved the way for Democrat Jared Golden’s surprise 2018 upset over incumbent GOP Rep. Bruce Poliquin, marking the first large-scale test of RCV statewide.

Golden’s campaign told Fox News Digital that RCV is a “nonfactor” in his current race. “Like 2020, this will be a head-to-head race,” a spokesperson for the campaign said.

In response to criticisms, Peltola said that while RCV gets a lot of attention in Alaska, the true denominator is the open-primary system.

“We need more people willing to work with the other party, and Alaska’s system gives those candidates a chance. For instance, I wouldn’t have won a Democratic primary – I’m too conservative, and I talk about things that don’t just appeal to the Democratic base,” Peltola said.

“Open primaries and ranked-choice voting give a voice to the 64% of Alaskans that aren’t Democrats or Republicans.”



Source link

Trump promises ‘great’ Iron Dome in US that would be ‘made in America’


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Former President Trump promised to build a “great” Iron Dome for the U.S. during his birthday rally in Florida, saying that it would be “made in America.”

“By next term we will build a great Iron Dome over our country,” Trump said at his 78th birthday soirée at Club 47 in West Palm Beach on Friday evening. “We deserve a dome. We deserve it all, made state of the art. 

“It’s a missile defense shield, and it’ll all be made in America,” he said. “Jobs, jobs, jobs.”

BIDEN CAMP JABS AT TRUMP’S ‘FAILED’ BUSINESS RECORD AS FORMER PRESIDENT LOOKS TO SWAY NATION’S TOP CEOS

Trump Rally

Former President Donald Trump speaks before members of the Club 47 group at the Palm Beach Convention Center. (Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Trump said that Ronald Reagan once rooted for an Iron Dome in the U.S., “but at that time, we didn’t have the technology.”

“We now have the technology,” Trump said.

Trump Rally

Former President Donald Trump stands near a birthday cake given to him before he spoke to members of the Club 47 group at the Palm Beach Convention Center on June 14, 2024, in West Palm Beach, Florida.  ( Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Trump said his proposed Iron Dome will be made in America and that it will create “beautiful” opportunities for young people.

“It’s all going to be made in states,” he said. “We’re going to have a big, beautiful Iron Dome.”

TRUMP RILES UP FIERY SWING STATE CROWD IN FIRST RALLY SINCE NEW YORK CONVICTION

“Great opportunity for young people,” Trump said.

Rocket fire over Israel

An Israeli missile launched from the Iron Dome defense missile system attempts to intercept a rocket, fired from the Gaza Strip, over the city of Netivot in southern Israel on October 8, 2023. (MAHMUD HAMS/AFP via Getty Images)

Israel’s missile defense system, or Iron Dome, is largely funded by the United States.

The system is designed to intercept and destroy short-range rockets and artillery fired from no more than 43 miles away.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Since its creation in 2011, the Iron Dome has rebuffed and destroyed rockets from Hamas militants, Palestinian forces and Iranian drones and missiles.



Source link

Federal judge blocks Biden administration’s Title IX changes in four states


A federal judge has blocked President Biden’s expansion of Title IX in four states, calling the mandatory gender identity protections an “abuse of power.”

U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty granted a preliminary injunction on Thursday, and referred to the Biden administration’s unilateral Title IX changes as a “threat to democracy.”

“This case demonstrates the abuse of power by executive federal agencies in the rulemaking process,” Doughty said in his ruling. “The separation of powers and system of checks and balances exist in this country for a reason.”

Doughty ruled that the changes were inadmissible because the term “gender discrimination” as used in the establishment of Title IX “only included discrimination against biological males and females at the time of enactment.”

‘PUTTING OUR GIRLS AT RISK’: BIDEN’S TITLE IX CHANGES CHALLENGED BY NEARLY 70 GOP LAWMAKERS

Biden speaks at White House

President Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 31. (Michael Reynolds/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Doughty ruled that the changes were inadmissible because the term “gender discrimination” as used in the establishment of Title IX “only included discrimination against biological males and females at the time of enactment.”

The ruling blocks implementation of the changes in Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana and Idaho.

Title IX is a longstanding civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in schools and other education centers that receive federal funding. 

SIX STATES SUE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION OVER NEW TITLE IX PROTECTIONS FOR TRANS ATHLETES IN GIRLS’ SPORTS

Under the administration’s new rules, sex discrimination would include discrimination based on gender identity as well as sexual orientation. 

READ THE JUDGE’S RULING — APP USERS, CLICK HERE:

The latest update, from April, expands the definition of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity — a move that critics say would undermine hard-won protections for women and girls. 

A school would not be able to separate or treat people differently based on sex, except in limited circumstances, under the provisions. 

Critics say that the change will allow locker rooms and bathrooms to be based on gender identity.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

LGBTQ+ students who face discrimination would be entitled to a response from their school under Title IX, and those failed by their schools can seek recourse from the federal government.

Advocates have hailed the change as necessary to protect transgender students. The rule is set to take effect Aug. 1.

Lawsuits against the Biden administration’s changes — similar to the Louisiana case — are underway in states across the country.

Fox News’ Elizabeth Elkind and Joshua Q. Nelson contributed to this report.



Source link

Rule of law on ballot in NYC suburbs as cop, veteran trade barbs over border crisis, policing


Former NYPD Inspector Alison Esposito slammed her congressional opponent at an event for GOP women candidates, claiming his move from the military to Congress led to a change in his tact toward public service.

In response, Rep. Patrick Ryan, D-N.Y., an Iraq War veteran, highlighted a recent trip to the southern border and bipartisan support from Hudson Valley law enforcement officials.

Esposito, a 2024 recruit by Rep. Elise Stefanik’s Republican women’s candidate group, E-PAC, said she is a cop, not a politician.

“That is what I am. That is what I always will be,” she said, adding she was in the thick of the George Floyd riots and recounting being hit in the head by a cabinet tossed out a window by protesters. She compared it to a scene in “Braveheart.”

ROCKLAND COUNTY EXECUTIVE TORCHES NYC MAYOR OVER MIGRANT BUSING DEAL

She claimed Ryan portrays himself as a moderate on such rule-of-law issues, while acting otherwise. Ryan later pushed back.

“He wants to play the moderate game, but then, at the same time, it’s important to remember when he was the Ulster County executive, he made Ulster a sanctuary county,” Esposito said.

“Now, I thank him very much for the service, and I respect it immensely. But I would submit that the second he took off that uniform, he stopped serving the American people.”

In 2019, Ryan enacted an order adjusting procedures involving cooperation with immigration authorities, and he noted Thursday that Ulster strenuously avoided “sanctuary city” terminology.

Ryan said he was one of 15 Democrats to demand President Biden seal the border by executive order, adding, “The No. 1 thing I learned as an Army officer: When in charge, take charge. We are in a crisis; the president is in charge.”

Esposito highlighted how her area had seen migrants being sent upriver to be housed as New York City became overrun. 

Migrants had been sent to suburbs like Orangeburg, Middletown and Newburgh, and Esposito said New York Democrats who supported sanctuary state policies finally realized what they had agreed to.

“It was only a matter of time. … They were fine with the influx at the southern border as long as [migrants] stayed in the south. When the [border-state] governors were dealing with thousands a day, they would send a couple hundred up. And now you have the same sanctuary politicians screaming, ‘Oh no, wait, this is unsustainable’,” she said.

Both candidates said rule of law and border security are top election issues, and Esposito illustrated her own recent visit to Orange County, where the issues remain front and center.

pat_ryan_alison_esposito_ny_congress

Rep. Pat Ryan, D-N.Y., is facing off against former NYPD Inspector Alison Esposito in November. (Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“You had an individual that was on the deportation list that was awaiting trial who [allegedly] killed two people,” she said. “You come out of ShopRite in Middletown, and you have the migrants and the illegal immigrants holding their babies, selling water, selling roses,” Esposito said.

Stefanik said Esposito and five other endorsed women she introduced at her E-PAC event could be the difference in November.

“With the help of these rising stars, House Republicans are going to … help save our country from the disastrous policies of far-left Democrats.”



Source link

Military officials’ worries about ‘optics’ are to blame for National Guard delay Jan. 6, top Republican says


The top Republican investigating the work of the House select committee on Jan. 6 believes military officials defied former President Trump and delayed sending the National Guard to the Capitol that day.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., is chair of the House Administration Committee’s subcommittee on oversight. In that role, he conducted a months-long investigation into the now-defunct panel set up by former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., after the Capitol riot.

“From what we’ve learned from senior leadership within the D.C. National Guard and then some information we’re deriving from the Pentagon, is that, yes, it was, from leaders within the Pentagon that either through incompetence, poor communications or … a concern of optics, they purposely delayed the National Guard actually getting to the Capitol,” Loudermilk said.

PELOSI SAYS IT’S ‘WRONG’ TO INVITE ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU TO SPEAK TO CONGRESS: ‘VERY SAD’

Pro-Trump rioters swarm the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6, 2021

House Republicans are investigating Jan. 6 and the work of the now-defunct Democrat-led Jan. 6 committee (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

“Had they gotten there at the time when the request was made, it’s arguable that lives could have been saved because there were some deaths by people being trampled, the crowd outside. With the National Guard showing up, I think it wouldn’t even require the engagement. I think the visual of the National Guard showing up, coming off buses in riot gear, would have been enough to suppress a lot of the violence that was happening.”

Pelosi’s office responded in a statement to Fox News Digital, “Loudermilk is absolutely correct that, had there not been an inexplicable delay, the National Guard response could have saved lives with its response. The request for National Guard response was absolutely made early enough to limit the damage done on that day. The problem is, the authorities responsible in the Pentagon — and ultimately, in the White House — dragged their feet.”

Pelosi and other Democrats had blamed Trump for the delays in sending in the National Guard for roughly three hours while Capitol Police and Washington, D.C., law enforcement were fighting to keep the ex-president’s supporters from harming lawmakers.

Trump had previously blamed Pelosi for the delay, but she would not have had the authority to call in federal troops. Pelosi’s office has also previously pushed back on any blame.

PELOSI REBUKED TO HER FACE DURING OXFORD DEBATE AFTER CONDEMNING AMERICANS CLOUDED BY ‘GUNS, GAYS, GOD’

Rep. Loudermilk pointing

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., is leading the House GOP’s investigation. (Getty images)

Loudermilk told Fox News Digital that, based on the investigation, it appears military officials under the Defense Secretary were to blame. He accused them of “without a doubt” acting in direct contradiction to Trump’s wishes.

“He had already delegated that authority to the Secretary of Defense,” Loudermilk said.

Pelosi’s office claimed, however, that Trump “did not” do so. 

“At any point during the attack on the Capitol, Trump could have ordered a D.C. National Guard response,” Pelosi’s office said. “He didn’t.”

Loudermilk’s panel released 45 minutes of footage taken by Pelosi’s daughter, Alexandra Pelosi, for an HBO documentary, but which was not previously released, earlier this week.

Clips viewed by Fox News Digital showed military officials and others assuring lawmakers who had been evacuated to Fort McNair that the National Guard had been activated but could not explain the delay.

DOJ WILL NOT TURN OVER BIDEN’S RECORDED INTERVIEW WITH SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR TO CONGRESS

Donald Trump arrives to Trump Tower after being found guilty

Loudermilk said former President Trump is not to blame for the National Guard delay (Felipe Ramales for Fox News Digital)

One video shows Pelosi’s exchange with a military official in the 3 p.m. hour Jan. 6, 2021, who told her the National Guard had been activated.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Another clip appears to show the Pelosi on the phone with D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, who said that Trump chief of staff Mark Meadows pledged any support needed to deal with the protests.

“The Trump administration, from all the evidence that we’re gathering, was doing everything that they could to make sure that there was plenty of security,” Loudermilk said.

Fox News Digital reached out to Bowser’s office for comment.



Source link

Trump reveals two Dem senators he is targeting during closed-door meeting


EXCLUSIVE: Former President Trump revealed that he is targeting two red state Democrat senators in 2024, a source tells Fox News Digital.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., asked Trump to share with lawmakers the importance of taking back the Senate in 2024 during a meeting Thursday on Capitol Hill, according to a person in the room. Graham mentioned that there are several vulnerable Democrats in the Senate with records very similar to President Biden’s.

Trump said Sens. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, and Jon Tester, D-Mont., are top of the list of Democrats he is seeking to oust in 2024 — two vulnerable Democrats who are facing tough re-election bids in red states won by Trump in 2020.

“They opposed everything I did while I was president, and now they are talking like Republicans,” Trump said, according to the source.

‘HUGE PROBLEM’: VULNERABLE DEM SENATOR RIPPED AFTER INTERVIEW RESURFACES TOUTING SIMILARITY WITH BIDEN

Sen. Jon Tester, former President Donald Trump, and Sen. Sherrod Brown split

From left: Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.; former President Donald Trump; and Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio. (Kevin Dietsch/Steven Hirsch-Pool)

Brown and Tester have both appeared to be distancing themselves from President Biden as polls continue to show the president falling behind in several key swing states.

Tester released a memo in May that touted his “standing up to President Biden and his Administration” on several issues, including the border and COVID mandates. However, Tester’s GOP opponent Tim Sheehy previously told Fox News Digital that the Democratic senator has a habit of changing his tune to appear more moderate in election years.

When asked about Trump focusing on Tester’s seat in 2024, a spokesperson for Tester said the former president “signed more than 20 of Jon Tester’s bills into law.”

“Jon Tester does what’s right for Montana. That’s why when President Trump was in office, he signed more than 20 of Jon Tester’s bills into law to help veterans, crack down on government waste and abuse, and support our first responders,” Monica Robinson, spokesperson for Montanans for Tester, told Fox News Digital in a statement.

VULNERABLE DEM SENATOR HIT WITH BLISTERING AD AS RECORD ON KEY ISSUE FACES SCRUTINY: ‘F- RATING’

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.

Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., speaks to reporters as he walks through the Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 5. (Anna Moneymaker)

“You know this is what he does. Five years out of every six he’s a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, firm progressive. Votes lockstep with [Senate Majority Leader Chuck] Schumer, Biden and every other progressive in the country,” Sheehy told Fox in November. “And then, for his election year, he tries to shift back to the center and act like he’s a moderate.” 

Brown has also been hit by his GOP opponent for his record of voting with President Biden nearly 100% of the time.

When asked about Trump’s comment, the senator’s campaign told Fox News Digital that Brown “worked with President Trump” during his administration.

“Sherrod will work with anyone when it’s right for Ohio and worked with President Trump to renegotiate NAFTA and pass legislation to lower the cost of prescription drugs and make sure law enforcement officers have the resources they need to keep themselves safe and keep fentanyl out of Ohio communities,” a campaign spokesperson for Brown told Fox News Digital in a statement.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, is seen during Senate voting in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 23. (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

“Sherrod Brown parades around Ohio telling voters that he is a moderate, while he votes with Joe Biden 99% of the time and consistently sells out Ohio workers,” Reagan McCarthy, communications director for the Bernie Moreno campaign, told Fox News Digital. 

“Brown has supported every single reckless spending package that has resulted in rampant inflation, voted for Biden’s attacks on American energy in favor of green energy schemes, and enabled Biden’s open-border invasion. We look forward to exposing his left-wing record and sending him packing in November.”

Brown told Politico earlier this year that he is going to “run my own race” and “my own brand,” while at the same time saying he is “not going to run away from Biden.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Cook Political Report ranks both the Ohio and Montana Senate races, states where Trump won comfortably in 2020, as toss ups, and many experts believe Republican chances to retake control of the Senate hinge on those races.



Source link

Fox News Politics: Alito Lit Up


Welcome to Fox News’ Politics newsletter with the latest political news from Washington D.C. and updates from the 2024 campaign trail. 

The top Democrat in the House believes Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito is “insurrectionist sympathizer” due to the flag that flew in front of his property in 2021.

“It appears that Justice Alito is an insurrectionist-sympathizer, joined by his right-wing buddy Clarence Thomas,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said at a press conference Friday.

Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann, continue to come under fire for previously flying the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, which features a pine tree on a white background. The flag was common in the Revolutionary War, but lately has become associated with extremism because it was flown by rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

When asked about criticisms of Justices Alito and Clarence Thomas, Jeffries told Fox News’ Chad Pergram that “the American people almost uniformly agree that the right-wing justices on the Supreme Court are completely and totally out of control.”

Jeffries also commented that the high bench cannot police itself when it comes to ethics and that there have been significantly moreaggressively partisan, right wing, extreme decisions” since Trump nominated a trio of justices.

Trials and Tribulations

UNEVEN PLAYING FIELD? DOJ maintains high success rate amid calls for ‘overcharging’ to be addressed …Read more

‘ABUSE OF POWER’: Federal judge issues fiery broadside against Title IX ‘gender identity’ rules …Read more

‘THE COURT HAS SPOKEN’: Trump campaign says SCOTUS decision striking down his ATF bump stock rule should be ‘respected’ …Read more

Tales from the Campaign Trail

‘GONNA F—IN’ LOSE ‘EM’: Democratic strategist sounds alarm over party’s key voting bloc …Read more

‘IMPOSTER’: Pelosi calls on Trump’s family, Republican Party to stage an ‘intervention’ for Trump …Read more

BREAKING THE BLUE: Top Dem Senate candidate diverted millions from police during crime surge for mental health funding …Read more

IN THE RED: Experts predict inflation election trouble for Biden: ‘Too late’ to fix …Read more

Congress

$895 BILLION: House passes $895 billion defense policy bill: Here’s what’s in it …Read more

AUTO-ENROLLMENT: House passes bill automatically registering men 18-26 for draft …Read more

White House

‘CAN’T REWARD LAWFARE’: Sen. Vance says he’s blocking Biden appointees as payback for Trump verdict …Read more

UNDER PRESS-URE: Biden snaps at reporter for refusing to ‘play by the rules’ by asking off-topic question …Read more

LEAD FOOT FETTERMAN: Senator’s driving record under scrutiny after ‘at fault’ accident …Read more

NO GO: AG Garland won’t be prosecuted for contempt over Biden, special counsel interview …Read more

COMMANDER IN TEETH: Biden reportedly witnessed dog Commander biting Secret Service agents: report …Read more

‘ABUSE OF POWER’: Federal judge issues fiery broadside against Title IX ‘gender identity’ rules …Read more

Across America

NO SCRUBS: Iowa Dem deleted anti-Trump posts on X to appear more moderate, critics say …Read more

CALIFORNIA DREAMING: Gov. Newsom takes heat for false claim about National Guard at border …Read more

‘FRIGHTENING TO PEOPLE’: Hochul says NYC mask ban on the table to deter antisemitic hate crimes …Read more

Subscribe now to get Fox News Politics newsletter in your inbox.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.



Source link

Biden DOJ’s ‘overcharging,’ partisan targeting shows ‘we have just lost our damn minds’: critics


With a staggering 99.6% success rate in court, some federal investigations under the Biden administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) are drawing scrutiny for alleged partisan bias and the little-known problem of overcharging — fueling calls for urgent reform among experts.

“We have just lost our damn minds when it comes to criminal prosecution,” healthcare defense attorney Ron Chapman told Fox News Digital in an interview. “Ninety-five percent of cases do not go to trial, because prosecutors can find fuzzy statutes to get such high maximums or even mandatory minimums at play, which force innocent people to plead guilty. And that’s what we’re dealing with — we’re dealing with tons of innocent people who may not be innocent of all the crimes, but they’re innocent of the ones that were overcharged against them.”

Prosecutors commonly charge additional felonies to pressure guilty pleas, Chapman said, which is denounced by the American Bar Association for violating defendants’ fair trial rights. Federal prosecutors have a 99.6% conviction rate, according to a 2019 Pew Research Center study. As such, federal investigations result in more pleas and avoid trials altogether. 

This week, a Texas doctor was charged by the DOJ with four felonies after exposing the hospital he worked in for allegedly secretly conducting transgender surgical procedures on children. Chapman, a former federal prosecutor for the U.S. Marines Corps, said, “This is a Merrick Garland allegation, guaranteed.”

5 FBI CONTROVERSIES OF 2023 THAT SHOOK FAITH IN AGENCY

Department of Justice logo

Department of Justice logo (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

“This would have had to come from the top,” Chapman said. “They’re almost asking for a lawsuit for this to go up to the Supreme Court.”

Last month, two pro-life activists were sentenced to several years in prison for staging a protest inside a D.C.-based abortion clinic in 2020. Federal prosecutors argued the pro-life activists violated the 1994 FACE Act, a federal law that prohibits physical force, threats of force or intentionally damaging property to prevent someone from obtaining or providing abortion services.

But the targeted investigations didn’t start under the Biden administration, Chapman said. Each administration “has their own agenda,” and will fulfill it accordingly.

There are stark differences in the types of investigations the DOJ will pursue. Justin Paperny, a federal prison consultant for white collar criminals, told Fox News Digital he’s seen an uptick in this administration going after more white collar crimes, compared to the former Trump administration, which was “more pro-business.” Professionals in the healthcare sector are also being investigated more thoroughly for fraud schemes. 

“We’ve had fewer drug cases than we had in the prior administration, and probably because it’s becoming more normal in this country,” Paperny said. “People try to draw this equivalence between Hunter Biden and Trump, but you have to actually question one prosecution versus the other. Everyone has an agenda, and these are things that people are paying more attention to because of this climate.”

FBI DIRECTOR PLEADS FOR CONGRESS TO KEEP PROGRAM ACCUSED OF SPYING ON AMERICANS

Lauren handy sentenced to prison

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly sentenced Lauren Handy, 30, of Alexandria, Virginia, to 57 months in prison and three years of supervised release. (Getty Images)

TEXAS HOSPITAL WHISTLEBLOWER SAYS DOJ INDICTMENT MEANT TO INTIMIDATE HIM AFTER HE EXPOSED GENDER CLINIC

Paperny, who previously went to prison in 2007 for financial crimes, said the government will also “pile on more charges” if a defendant pleads not guilty against the government. 

“Overcharging, threats of 20 to 30 years in federal prison, could compel someone who truly believes they’re innocent, to plead guilty,” he said. “So, many of these cases should be handled civilly at worst, not criminal. Yet, we continue to see prosecutions and people going to prison for very long periods of time, especially those who have exercised their right to go to trial.”

“These people who are going to trial and fighting it against the odds, it’s very inspiring,” he said. 

Dr. Eithan Haim — who accused the Texas Children’s Hospital of secretly performing transgender surgical procedures on minors despite previously claiming they planned to shut down the program after state Attorney General Ken Paxton released an opinion saying the procedures could be considered child abuse under state law — is one of those people who will fight against the DOJ’s charges.

“I refuse to back down or to be silenced,” Haim said in a post on X.

In December, the GOP-led House Judiciary Committee published a report detailing “the Extent of the FBI’s Weaponization of Law Enforcement Against Traditional Catholics,” which former FBI agent, Kyle Seraphin, blew the whistle on. 

The report said the committee studied the FBI’s categorization of traditional Catholic Americans “as potential domestic terrorists” after the FBI’s Richmond memorandum painted “radical-traditionalist Catholics” as violent extremists and proposed opportunities for the FBI to infiltrate Catholic churches as a form of “threat mitigation.”

DOJ's exceptional court success rate raises concerns of overcharging and pressure tactics, sparking urgent calls for reform: experts.

DOJ’s exceptional court success rate raises concerns of overcharging and pressure tactics, sparking urgent calls for reform: experts. (Bloomberg / Contributor Tom Williams / Contributor Drew Angerer / Staff)

“I think it’s a bigger problem than people think,” Seraphin told Fox News Digital in an interview. “And so my solution is broader than most people are comfortable with, but we spend roughly $11 billion a year on the investigative agency of the FBI, and people need to ask if the $11 billion spent is solving the problems the FBI was created to solve, and it’s my argument that that problem doesn’t even exist anymore.”  

“Most Americans don’t realize that there could be an active national security investigation on anyone,” he said. “That’s the thing that should scare the bejesus out of Americans.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

On Friday, the DOJ announced that it won’t prosecute Obama-appointed Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress over his refusal to turn over audio recordings of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Biden.

The House voted on Wednesday to hold Garland in contempt, after months of digging by House Republicans to try to bring into public view as much material from the special counsel interview as possible. 

The DOJ did not respond to a request to comment by press deadline.

Fox News’ Louis Casiano contributed to this report.



Source link

Pentagon ran secret anti-vax campaign to undermine China during pandemic


At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. military launched a secret campaign to counter what it perceived as China’s growing influence in the Philippines, a nation hit especially hard by the deadly virus.

The clandestine operation has not been previously reported. It aimed to sow doubt about the safety and efficacy of vaccines and other life-saving aid that was being supplied by China, a Reuters investigation found. Through phony internet accounts meant to impersonate Filipinos, the military’s propaganda efforts morphed into an anti-vax campaign. Social media posts decried the quality of face masks, test kits and the first vaccine that would become available in the Philippines – China’s Sinovac inoculation.

FAUCI DENIES SEEKING TO SUPPRESS COVID-19 LAB LEAK ORIGIN THEORY

Reuters identified at least 300 accounts on X, formerly Twitter, that matched descriptions shared by former U.S. military officials familiar with the Philippines operation. Almost all were created in the summer of 2020 and centered on the slogan #Chinaangvirus – Tagalog for China is the virus.

“COVID came from China and the VACCINE also came from China, don’t trust China!” one typical tweet from July 2020 read in Tagalog. The words were next to a photo of a syringe beside a Chinese flag and a soaring chart of infections. Another post read: “From China – PPE, Face Mask, Vaccine: FAKE. But the Coronavirus is real.”

After Reuters asked X about the accounts, the social media company removed the profiles, determining they were part of a coordinated bot campaign based on activity patterns and internal data.

The U.S. military’s anti-vax effort began in the spring of 2020 and expanded beyond Southeast Asia before it was terminated in mid-2021, Reuters determined. Tailoring the propaganda campaign to local audiences across Central Asia and the Middle East, the Pentagon used a combination of fake social media accounts on multiple platforms to spread fear of China’s vaccines among Muslims at a time when the virus was killing tens of thousands of people each day. A key part of the strategy: amplify the disputed contention that, because vaccines sometimes contain pork gelatin, China’s shots could be considered forbidden under Islamic law.

Military-Sexual-Assault

The Pentagon is seen from Air Force One as it flies over Washington, March 2, 2022. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. military launched a secret campaign to counter what it perceived as China’s growing influence in the Philippines, a nation hit especially hard by the deadly virus. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

The military program started under former President Donald Trump and continued months into Joe Biden’s presidency, Reuters found – even after alarmed social media executives warned the new administration that the Pentagon had been trafficking in COVID misinformation. The Biden White House issued an edict in spring 2021 banning the anti-vax effort, which also disparaged vaccines produced by other rivals, and the Pentagon initiated an internal review, Reuters found.

The U.S. military is prohibited from targeting Americans with propaganda, and Reuters found no evidence the Pentagon’s influence operation did so.

Spokespeople for Trump and Biden did not respond to requests for comment about the clandestine program.

A senior Defense Department official acknowledged the U.S. military engaged in secret propaganda to disparage China’s vaccine in the developing world, but the official declined to provide details.

A Pentagon spokeswoman said the U.S. military “uses a variety of platforms, including social media, to counter those malign influence attacks aimed at the U.S., allies, and partners.” She also noted that China had started a “disinformation campaign to falsely blame the United States for the spread of COVID-19.”

In an email, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that it has long maintained the U.S. government manipulates social media and spreads misinformation.

Manila’s embassy in Washington did not respond to Reuters inquiries, including whether it had been aware of the Pentagon operation. A spokesperson for the Philippines Department of Health, however, said the “findings by Reuters deserve to be investigated and heard by the appropriate authorities of the involved countries.” Some aide workers in the Philippines, when told of the U.S. military propaganda effort by Reuters, expressed outrage.

Briefed on the Pentagon’s secret anti-vax campaign by Reuters, some American public health experts also condemned the program, saying it put civilians in jeopardy for potential geopolitical gain. An operation meant to win hearts and minds endangered lives, they said.

“I don’t think it’s defensible,” said Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine. “I’m extremely dismayed, disappointed and disillusioned to hear that the U.S. government would do that,” said Lucey, a former military physician who assisted in the response to the 2001 anthrax attacks.

The effort to stoke fear about Chinese inoculations risked undermining overall public trust in government health initiatives, including U.S.-made vaccines that became available later, Lucey and others said. Although the Chinese vaccines were found to be less effective than the American-led shots by Pfizer and Moderna, all were approved by the World Health Organization. Sinovac did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.

Academic research published recently has shown that, when individuals develop skepticism toward a single vaccine, those doubts often lead to uncertainty about other inoculations. Lucey and other health experts say they saw such a scenario play out in Pakistan, where the Central Intelligence Agency used a fake hepatitis vaccination program in Abbottabad as cover to hunt for Osama bin Laden, the terrorist mastermind behind the attacks of September 11, 2001. Discovery of the ruse led to a backlash against an unrelated polio vaccination campaign, including attacks on healthcare workers, contributing to the reemergence of the deadly disease in the country.

“It should have been in our interest to get as much vaccine in people’s arms as possible,” said Greg Treverton, former chairman of the U.S. National Intelligence Council, which coordinates the analysis and strategy of Washington’s many spy agencies. What the Pentagon did, Treverton said, “crosses a line.”

‘WE WERE DESPERATE’

Together, the phony accounts used by the military had tens of thousands of followers during the program. Reuters could not determine how widely the anti-vax material and other Pentagon-planted disinformation was viewed, or to what extent the posts may have caused COVID deaths by dissuading people from getting vaccinated.

In the wake of the U.S. propaganda efforts, however, then-Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte had grown so dismayed by how few Filipinos were willing to be inoculated that he threatened to arrest people who refused vaccinations.

“You choose, vaccine or I will have you jailed,” a masked Duterte said in a televised address in June 2021. “There is a crisis in this country … I’m just exasperated by Filipinos not heeding the government.”

When he addressed the vaccination issue, the Philippines had among the worst inoculation rates in Southeast Asia. Only 2.1 million of its 114 million citizens were fully vaccinated – far short of the government’s target of 70 million. By the time Duterte spoke, COVID cases exceeded 1.3 million, and almost 24,000 Filipinos had died from the virus. The difficulty in vaccinating the population contributed to the worst death rate in the region.

A spokesperson for Duterte did not make the former president available for an interview.

Some Filipino healthcare professionals and former officials contacted by Reuters were shocked by the U.S. anti-vax effort, which they say exploited an already vulnerable citizenry. Public concerns about a Dengue fever vaccine, rolled out in the Philippines in 2016, had led to broad skepticism toward inoculations overall, said Lulu Bravo, executive director of the Philippine Foundation for Vaccination. The Pentagon campaign preyed on those fears.

“Why did you do it when people were dying? We were desperate,” said Dr. Nina Castillo-Carandang, a former adviser to the World Health Organization and Philippines government during the pandemic. “We don’t have our own vaccine capacity,” she noted, and the U.S. propaganda effort “contributed even more salt into the wound.”

The campaign also reinforced what one former health secretary called a longstanding suspicion of China, most recently because of aggressive behavior by Beijing in disputed areas of the South China Sea. Filipinos were unwilling to trust China’s Sinovac, which first became available in the country in March 2021, said Esperanza Cabral, who served as health secretary under President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. Cabral said she had been unaware of the U.S. military’s secret operation.

“I’m sure that there are lots of people who died from COVID who did not need to die from COVID,” she said.

To implement the anti-vax campaign, the Defense Department overrode strong objections from top U.S. diplomats in Southeast Asia at the time, Reuters found. Sources involved in its planning and execution say the Pentagon, which ran the program through the military’s psychological operations center in Tampa, Florida, disregarded the collateral impact that such propaganda may have on innocent Filipinos.

“We weren’t looking at this from a public health perspective,” said a senior military officer involved in the program. “We were looking at how we could drag China through the mud.”

A NEW DISINFORMATION WAR

In uncovering the secret U.S. military operation, Reuters interviewed more than two dozen current and former U.S officials, military contractors, social media analysts and academic researchers. Reporters also reviewed Facebook, X and Instagram posts, technical data and documents about a set of fake social media accounts used by the U.S. military. Some were active for more than five years.

Clandestine psychological operations are among the government’s most highly sensitive programs. Knowledge of their existence is limited to a small group of people within U.S. intelligence and military agencies. Such programs are treated with special caution because their exposure could damage foreign alliances or escalate conflict with rivals.

Over the last decade, some U.S. national security officials have pushed for a return to the kind of aggressive clandestine propaganda operations against rivals that the United States’ wielded during the Cold War. Following the 2016 U.S. presidential election, in which Russia used a combination of hacks and leaks to influence voters, the calls to fight back grew louder inside Washington.

In 2019, Trump authorized the Central Intelligence Agency to launch a clandestine campaign on Chinese social media aimed at turning public opinion in China against its government, Reuters reported in March. As part of that effort, a small group of operatives used bogus online identities to spread disparaging narratives about Xi Jinping’s government.

COVID-19 galvanized the drive to wage psychological operations against China. One former senior Pentagon leader described the pandemic as a “bolt of energy” that finally ignited the long delayed counteroffensive against China’s influence war.

The Pentagon’s anti-vax propaganda came in response to China’s own efforts to spread false information about the origins of COVID. The virus first emerged in China in late 2019. But in March 2020, Chinese government officials claimed without evidence that the virus may have been first brought to China by an American service member who participated in an international military sports competition in Wuhan the previous year. Chinese officials also suggested that the virus may have originated in a U.S. Army research facility at Fort Detrick, Maryland. There’s no evidence for that assertion.

Mirroring Beijing’s public statements, Chinese intelligence operatives set up networks of fake social media accounts to promote the Fort Detrick conspiracy, according to a U.S. Justice Department complaint.

China’s messaging got Washington’s attention. Trump subsequently coined the term “China virus” as a response to Beijing’s accusation that the U.S. military exported COVID to Wuhan.

“That was false. And rather than having an argument, I said, ‘I have to call it where it came from,’” Trump said in a March 2020 news conference. “It did come from China.”

China’s Foreign Ministry said in an email that it opposed “actions to politicize the origins question and stigmatize China.” The ministry had no comment about the Justice Department’s complaint.

Beijing didn’t limit its global influence efforts to propaganda. It announced an ambitious COVID assistance program, which included sending masks, ventilators and its own vaccines – still being tested at the time – to struggling countries. In May 2020, Xi announced that the vaccine China was developing would be made available as a “global public good,” and would ensure “vaccine accessibility and affordability in developing countries.” Sinovac was the primary vaccine available in the Philippines for about a year until U.S.-made vaccines became more widely available there in early 2022.

Washington’s plan, called Operation Warp Speed, was different. It favored inoculating Americans first, and it placed no restrictions on what pharmaceutical companies could charge developing countries for the remaining vaccines not used by the United States. The deal allowed the companies to “play hardball” with developing countries, forcing them to accept high prices, said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of medicine at Georgetown University who has worked with the World Health Organization.

The deal “sucked most of the supply out of the global market,” Gostin said. “The United States took a very determined America First approach.”

To Washington’s alarm, China’s offers of assistance were tilting the geopolitical playing field across the developing world, including in the Philippines, where the government faced upwards of 100,000 infections in the early months of the pandemic.

The U.S. relationship with Manila had grown tense after the 2016 election of the bombastic Duterte. A staunch critic of the United States, he had threatened to cancel a key pact that allows the U.S. military to maintain legal jurisdiction over American troops stationed in the country.

Duterte said in a July 2020 speech he had made “a plea” to Xi that the Philippines be at the front of the line as China rolled out vaccines. He vowed in the same speech that the Philippines would no longer challenge Beijing’s aggressive expansion in the South China Sea, upending a key security understanding Manila had long held with Washington.

“China is claiming it. We are claiming it. China has the arms, we do not have it.” Duterte said. “So, it is simple as that.”

Days later, China’s foreign minister announced Beijing would grant Duterte’s plea for priority access to the vaccine, as part of a “new highlight in bilateral relations.”

China’s growing influence fueled efforts by U.S. military leaders to launch the secret propaganda operation Reuters uncovered.

“We didn’t do a good job sharing vaccines with partners,” a senior U.S. military officer directly involved in the campaign in Southeast Asia told Reuters. “So what was left to us was to throw shade on China’s.”

MILITARY TRUMPED DIPLOMATS

U.S. military leaders feared that China’s COVID diplomacy and propaganda could draw other Southeast Asian countries, such as Cambodia and Malaysia, closer to Beijing, furthering its regional ambitions.

A senior U.S. military commander responsible for Southeast Asia, Special Operations Command Pacific General Jonathan Braga, pressed his bosses in Washington to fight back in the so-called information space, according to three former Pentagon officials.

The commander initially wanted to punch back at Beijing in Southeast Asia. The goal: to ensure the region understood the origin of COVID while promoting skepticism toward what were then still-untested vaccines offered by a country that they said had lied continually since the start of the pandemic.

A spokesperson for Special Operations Command declined to comment.

At least six senior State Department officials responsible for the region objected to this approach. A health crisis was the wrong time to instill fear or anger through a psychological operation, or psyop, they argued during Zoom calls with the Pentagon.

“We’re stooping lower than the Chinese and we should not be doing that,” said a former senior State Department official for the region who fought against the military operation.

While the Pentagon saw Washington’s rapidly diminishing influence in the Philippines as a call to action, the withering partnership led American diplomats to plead for caution.

“The relationship is hanging from a thread,” another former senior U.S. diplomat recounted. “Is this the moment you want to do a psyop in the Philippines? Is it worth the risk?”

In the past, such opposition from the State Department might have proved fatal to the program. Previously in peacetime, the Pentagon needed approval of embassy officials before conducting psychological operations in a country, often hamstringing commanders seeking to quickly respond to Beijing’s messaging, three former Pentagon officials told Reuters.

But in 2019, before COVID surfaced in full force, then-Secretary of Defense Mark Esper signed a secret order that later paved the way for the launch of the U.S. military propaganda campaign. The order elevated the Pentagon’s competition with China and Russia to the priority of active combat, enabling commanders to sidestep the State Department when conducting psyops against those adversaries. The Pentagon spending bill passed by Congress that year also explicitly authorized the military to conduct clandestine influence operations against other countries, even “outside of areas of active hostilities.”

Esper, through a spokesperson, declined to comment. A State Department spokesperson referred questions to the Pentagon.

U.S. PROPAGANDA MACHINE

In spring 2020, special-ops commander Braga turned to a cadre of psychological-warfare soldiers and contractors in Tampa to counter Beijing’s COVID efforts. Colleagues say Braga was a longtime advocate of increasing the use of propaganda operations in global competition. In trailers and squat buildings at a facility on Tampa’s MacDill Air Force Base, U.S. military personnel and contractors would use anonymous accounts on X, Facebook and other social media to spread what became an anti-vax message. The facility remains the Pentagon’s clandestine propaganda factory.

Psychological warfare has played a role in U.S. military operations for more than a hundred years, although it has changed in style and substance over time. So-called psyopers were best known following World War II for their supporting role in combat missions across Vietnam, Korea and Kuwait, often dropping leaflets to confuse the enemy or encourage their surrender.

After the al Qaeda attacks of 2001, the United States was fighting a borderless, shadowy enemy, and the Pentagon began to wage a more ambitious kind of psychological combat previously associated only with the CIA. The Pentagon set up front news outlets, paid off prominent local figures, and sometimes funded television soap operas in order to turn local populations against militant groups or Iranian-backed militias, former national security officials told Reuters.

Unlike earlier psyop missions, which sought specific tactical advantage on the battlefield, the post-9/11 operations hoped to create broader change in public opinion across entire regions.

By 2010, the military began using social media tools, leveraging phony accounts to spread messages of sympathetic local voices – themselves often secretly paid by the United States government. As time passed, a growing web of military and intelligence contractors built online news websites to pump U.S.-approved narratives into foreign countries. Today, the military employs a sprawling ecosystem of social media influencers, front groups and covertly placed digital advertisements to influence overseas audiences, according to current and former military officials.

China’s efforts to gain geopolitical clout from the pandemic gave Braga justification to launch the propaganda campaign that Reuters uncovered, sources said.

PORK IN THE VACCINE?

By summer 2020, the military’s propaganda campaign moved into new territory and darker messaging, ultimately drawing the attention of social media executives.

In regions beyond Southeast Asia, senior officers in the U.S. Central Command, which oversees military operations across the Middle East and Central Asia, launched their own version of the COVID psyop, three former military officials told Reuters.

Although the Chinese vaccines were still months from release, controversy roiled the Muslim world over whether the vaccines contained pork gelatin and could be considered “haram,” or forbidden under Islamic law. Sinovac has said that the vaccine was “manufactured free of porcine materials.” Many Islamic religious authorities maintained that even if the vaccines did contain pork gelatin, they were still permissible since the treatments were being used to save human life.

The Pentagon campaign sought to intensify fears about injecting a pig derivative. As part of an internal investigation at X, the social media company used IP addresses and browser data to identify more than 150 phony accounts that were operated from Tampa by U.S. Central Command and its contractors, according to an internal X document reviewed by Reuters.

“Can you trust China, which tries to hide that its vaccine contains pork gelatin and distributes it in Central Asia and other Muslim countries where many people consider such a drug haram?” read an April 2021 tweet sent from a military-controlled account identified by X.

The Pentagon also covertly spread its messages on Facebook and Instagram, alarming executives at parent company Meta who had long been tracking the military accounts, according to former military officials.

One military-created meme targeting Central Asia showed a pig made out of syringes, according to two people who viewed the image. Reuters found similar posts that traced back to U.S. Central Command. One shows a Chinese flag as a curtain separating Muslim women in hijabs and pigs stuck with vaccine syringes. In the center is a man with syringes; on his back is the word “China.” It targeted Central Asia, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, a country that distributed tens of millions of doses of China’s vaccines and participated in human trials. Translated into English, the X post reads: “China distributes a vaccine made of pork gelatin.”

Facebook executives had first approached the Pentagon in the summer of 2020, warning the military that Facebook workers had easily identified the military’s phony accounts, according to three former U.S. officials and another person familiar with the matter. The government, Facebook argued, was violating Facebook’s policies by operating the bogus accounts and by spreading COVID misinformation.

The military argued that many of its fake accounts were being used for counterterrorism and asked Facebook not to take down the content, according to two people familiar with the exchange. The Pentagon pledged to stop spreading COVID-related propaganda, and some of the accounts continued to remain active on Facebook.

Nonetheless, the anti-vax campaign continued into 2021 as Biden took office.

Angered that military officials had ignored their warning, Facebook officials arranged a Zoom meeting with Biden’s new National Security Council shortly after the inauguration, Reuters learned. The discussion quickly became tense.

“It was terrible,” said a senior administration official describing the reaction after learning of the campaign’s pig-related posts. “I was shocked. The administration was pro-vaccine and our concern was this could affect vaccine hesitancy, especially in developing countries.”

By spring 2021, the National Security Council ordered the military to stop all anti-vaccine messaging. “We were told we needed to be pro-vaccine, pro all vaccines,” said a former senior military officer who helped oversee the program. Even so, Reuters found some anti-vax posts that continued through April and other deceptive COVID-related messaging that extended into that summer. Reuters could not determine why the campaign didn’t end immediately with the NSC’s order. In response to questions from Reuters, the NSC declined to comment.

The senior Defense Department official said that those complaints led to an internal review in late 2021, which uncovered the anti-vaccine operation. The probe also turned up other social and political messaging that was “many, many leagues away” from any acceptable military objective. The official would not elaborate.

The review intensified the following year, the official said, after a group of academic researchers at Stanford University flagged some of the same accounts as pro-Western bots in a public report. The high-level Pentagon review was first reported by the Washington Post, which also reported that the military used fake social media accounts to counter China’s message that COVID came from the United States. But the Post report did not reveal that the program evolved into the anti-vax propaganda campaign uncovered by Reuters.

The senior defense official said the Pentagon has rescinded parts of Esper’s 2019 order that allowed military commanders to bypass the approval of U.S. ambassadors when waging psychological operations. The rules now mandate that military commanders work closely with U.S. diplomats in the country where they seek to have an impact. The policy also restricts psychological operations aimed at “broad population messaging,” such as those used to promote vaccine hesitancy during COVID.

The Pentagon’s audit concluded that the military’s primary contractor handling the campaign, General Dynamics IT, had employed sloppy tradecraft, taking inadequate steps to hide the origin of the fake accounts, said a person with direct knowledge of the review. The review also found that military leaders didn’t maintain enough control over its psyop contractors, the person said.

A spokesperson for General Dynamics IT declined to comment.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Nevertheless, the Pentagon’s clandestine propaganda efforts are set to continue. In an unclassified strategy document last year, top Pentagon generals wrote that the U.S. military could undermine adversaries such as China and Russia using “disinformation spread across social media, false narratives disguised as news, and similar subversive activities [to] weaken societal trust by undermining the foundations of government.”

And in February, the contractor that worked on the anti-vax campaign – General Dynamics IT – won a $493 million contract. Its mission: to continue providing clandestine influence services for the military.



Source link

Top Dem Senate candidate diverted millions from police during crime surge to fund mental health facility


FIRST ON FOX: The Democrat running in one of this year’s top Senate races previously diverted millions of dollars from law enforcement to fund a mental health facility despite an ongoing surge in crime.

Prince George’s County executive Angela Alsobrooks, who is running to replace retiring Democrat Sen. Ben Cardin in Maryland, announced in June 2020 that $20 million in the county budget already set aside for a new police training facility would instead be used to treat mental health and addiction.

Alsobrooks argued during her announcement concerning the reallocation that a third of inmates at Prince George’s County jails had mental illnesses, such as addiction, and that it was “unjust” to treat them in jail, Maryland Matters reported at the time.

EXPERTS PREDICT INFLATION ELECTION TROUBLE FOR BIDEN: ‘TOO LATE’ TO FIX

Angela Alsobrooks

Maryland Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and Prince George’s County executive Angela Alsobrooks speaks at a campaign event on Gun Violence Awareness Day at Kentland Community Center on June 7, 2024 in Landover, Maryland. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

The reallocation came amid a wave of nationwide protests following the death of George Floyd while in police custody, which led to increased calls for defunding police by Democrats and left-wing activists. Violent crime also surged that year, including a historic 30% nationwide increase in the murder rate from the previous year, according to FBI statistics.

Those statistics were similar when taking into account just Prince George’s County, which saw a 16% increase in overall violent crime from 2019 to 2020, as well as a 58% increase in reported homicides, a 19% increase in reported robberies and a 15% increase in reported aggravated assaults, all according to FBI statistics. The county did experience a small drop in property crime from 2019-2020.

Alsobrooks double-downed on the decision to divert the money years later during a fireside chat with Ebenezer AME Church, despite the increases in crime seen across her county.

TRUMP RALLY DRAWS SWING STATE VOTERS ANGRY OVER ‘SHAM’ CONVICTION: ‘BIGGEST SCAM EVER’

Alsobrooks Maryland

From left to right, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, Maryland Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate and Prince George’s County executive Angela Alsobrooks and Vice President Kamala Harris stand on stage together after speaking at a campaign event on Gun Violence Awareness Day at Kentland Community Center on June 7, 2024 in Landover, Maryland. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

“And so one of the things that we’ve done during our administration is, I decided that we were going to reallocate $20 million away from a police training facility. Now, we still have a training facility, but this one was going to be very expensive. And I have decided that you can’t heal people in jail,” Alsobrooks said in the January 2022 interview.

“I have reallocated, with the support of the County Council who had to vote to approve it — and it was also on your ballot in 2020. You had to approve it as well — but we instead have reallocated $20 million. And we are now opening the doors to a new mental health care and addictions care facility that will be opening the doors this July, in partnership with luminous health care, so that we can actually heal our loved ones and not treat them in jail.” 

Gina Ford, a spokesperson for Alsobrooks, told Fox News Digital, “As the chief law enforcement official, Angela Alsobrooks oversaw a 50% decrease in violent crime. And as County Executive, Angela has increased the police department’s budget by 22% over her tenure.”

BIDEN CAMP JABS AT TRUMP’S ‘FAILED’ BUSINESS RECORD AS FORMER PRESIDENT LOOKS TO SWAY NATION’S TOP CEOs

Former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan

Former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan speaking at an annual meeting of the Republican Jewish Coalition on Nov. 18, 2022. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)

Ford’s reference to a decrease in violent crime came during Alsbobrooks’ time serving as the state attorney for Prince George’s County from 2011 to 2018, when violent crime did indeed see a 50% drop.

Since becoming country executive in 2018, however, violent crime in the county has increased 30% through 2022, according to FBI statistics.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Alsobrooks will face former Republican Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan in the November general election.

Elections analysts rate the race as “likely Democratic,” although Hogan could keep the race competitive considering his high approval rating upon leaving office in 2023 despite leading a traditionally deep-blue state.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.



Source link

House Democratic leader declares Justice Alito ‘a right-wing insurrectionist’ amid flag fracas


House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., declared Bush-appointed Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito an “insurrectionist sympathizer” while also condmening Justice Clarence Thomas in comments to Fox News on Friday.

Jeffries’ barb comes as Alito and his wife, Martha-Ann, continue to be under fire for previously flying the “Appeal to Heaven” flag, which features a pine tree on a white background. 

The flag became associated with the January 6, 2021 Capitol protests after some protesters who broke into the complex carried the banner around, in an apparent throwback to its Colonial significance. The flag itself dates back to the American Revolution when it was notably utilized in a maritime fashion by Continental Army ships in the 1770s.

The pine tree is a symbol of the state of Maine as well as the state tree, while the “appeal to heaven” caption describes the hopes of colonists that God would deliver them from British tyranny.

ALITO’S WIFE DISPLAYED UPSIDE DOWN FLAG AFTER ARGUMENT WITH INSULTING NEIGHBOR

Associate Justice Samuel Alito

Liberal media and Democratic Party leaders have used the classic “Appeal to Heaven” colonial era flag to link Supreme Court Justice Alito to Jan. 6 insurrectionists. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)

When asked about criticisms of Justices Alito and Clarence Thomas, Jeffries told Fox News’ Chad Pergram that, “the American people almost uniformly agree that the right-wing justices on the Supreme Court are completely and totally out of control.”

“It appears that Justice Alito is an insurrectionist-sympathizer, joined by his right-wing buddy Clarence Thomas,” Jeffries said, as Democrats often utilize the term to describe those involved in the protests, as well as former President Trump.

Jeffries called the meeting between Trump and Republicans on Capitol Hill “shameful and an embarrassment that [they] wanted to welcome the insurrectionist-in-chief back as a conquering hero.”

Jeffries also commented that the high bench cannot police itself when it comes to ethics and that there have been significantly moreaggressively partisan, right wing, extreme decisions” since Trump nominated a trio of justices.

JUSTICE ALITO WARNS COLLEGE STUDENTS THAT ‘SUPPORT FOR FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS DECLINING’ 

“[T]his is why Democrats after the fall of 2022 are winning… and overperforming.”

In May, Alito responded to criticisms of the Appeal to Heaven flag having flown at his Alexandria, Va. home in the wake of the Capitol protests by telling Fox News that his wife displayed it for an unrelated reason.

Alito claimed Martha-Ann had placed it in response to insults directed at her from a neighbor, saying the situation started when the neighbor posted a “F— Trump” sign very close to a school bus stop.

In a recent letter responding to demands from Democratic Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island and Dick Durbin of Illinois that he recuse himself from Trump v. United States and any cases pertaining to January 6, Alito strenuously rejected their demand.

“[Martha-Ann] did not fly it to associate herself with that or any other group and the use of an old historic flag by a new group does not necessarily drain that flag of all other meanings,” Alito wrote.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“A reasonable person who is not motivated by political or ideological considerations or a desire to affect Supreme Court cases would conclude that this event does not meet the applicable standard for recusal. I am therefore duty-bound to reject your recusal request,” he added.

Fox News’ Shannon Bream contributed to this report.



Source link

Trump campaign says Supreme Court’s decision striking down his admin’s bump stock rule ‘should be respected’


The campaign for former President Donald Trump reacted to the Supreme Court’s decision Thursday striking down a Trump-era ban on a firearm accessory known as a “bump stock.” 

“The Court has spoken and their decision should be respected,” said Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt in a statement. 

“President Trump has been and always will be a fierce defender of Americans’ Second Amendment rights and he is proud to be endorsed by the NRA. During a time when our border is open to terrorists and criminals, and migrant crime is on the rise, the right to keep and bear arms has never been more critical, and Joe Biden wants to take that right away from law-abiding Americans. President Trump won’t let that happen,” Leavitt said.

In a 6-3 decision, the high court’s majority said that a bump stock does not transform a firearm into a machine gun and that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) “exceeded its statutory authority” by issuing the rule. 

SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN FEDERAL BAN ON BUMP STOCKS

Trump Bronx Rally

Former President Donald Trump holds a rally in the historically Democratic South Bronx on May 23, 2024, in New York City. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

A bump stock is an attachment that replaces a semi-automatic weapon’s standard stock, the part of the long weapon that rests on the shoulder.

As the shooter applies forward thrust on the barrel, the device harnesses the recoil energy so that the trigger will “bump” against the stationary finger, which then allows another round to be fired. The effect is more rapid shots than with a standard stock.

The high court’s majority found that the statutory definition of a “machinegun” is any weapon capable of firing “automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 

“Congress has long restricted access to “‘machinegun[s],'” a category of firearms defined by the ability to “shoot, automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the majority.

TEXAS GUN STORE OWNER SAYS SUPREME COURT SHOULD LIMIT GOVERNMENT ‘POWER’ IN ‘BUMP STOCK’ BAN CASE

A bump stock and handguns collected during a buyback event in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, on Saturday, March 4, 2023.

A bump stock and handguns collected during a buyback event in the Wilmington neighborhood of Los Angeles, California, on Saturday, March 4, 2023. (Jill Connelly/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“Semiautomatic firearms, which require shooters to reengage the trigger for every shot, are not machineguns. This case asks whether a bump stock—an accessory for a semi-automatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire)—converts the rifle into a ‘machinegun.’ We hold that it does not,” he said. 

After a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas that left 60 people dead and 500 more wounded, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued an interpretive rule concluding that “bump stocks” are machine guns.

“This tragedy created tremendous political pressure to outlaw bump stocks nationwide. Within days, Members of Congress proposed bills to ban bump stocks and other devices ‘designed to accelerate the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle,’” Thomas wrote in Thursday’s opinion.

The Trump administration initiated a ban on the devices — reversing earlier regulations — and President Biden’s Justice Department defended it in court. 

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the majority saying, “the Court puts bump stocks back in civilian hands. To do so, it casts aside Congress’s definition of ‘machinegun’ and seizes upon one that is inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text and unsupported by context or purpose.”

TRUMP DEMANDS BIDEN ‘DRUG TEST,’ RIPS ‘RADICAL’ RFK JR. IN BID TO ‘REBELLIOUS BUNCH’ AT NRA

Trump at NRA event

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a National Rifle Association (NRA) event. (NRA )

“When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck. A bump-stock-equipped semiautomatic rifle fires ‘automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. Because I, like Congress, call that a machinegun, I respectfully dissent,” Sotomayor wrote. 

Michael Cargill, owner of Central Texas Gun Works, sued the government after he was forced to surrender several “bump stocks” under the ATF’s rule. He argued that the agency had overstepped its administrative authority to impose a ban, absent any congressional action.

“Over five years ago I swore I would defend the Constitution of the United States, even if I was the only plaintiff in the case. I did just that,” Cargill, an Army veteran, said Friday. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Trump spoke at the National Rifle Association’s Annual Meeting in Texas last month, thanking the “great patriots” for the endorsements, but reprimanded the “rebellious bunch” for not voting.

“But one thing I’ll say, and I say it as friends, we’ve got to get gun owners to vote, because you know what? I don’t know what it is. Perhaps it’s a form of rebellion, because you’re a rebellious people, aren’t you?,” Trump said. “But gun owners don’t vote. What is that all about?”

“If gun owners would vote, we would swamp them at levels that nobody’s ever seen before,” he said. “So, I think you’re a rebellious bunch. So let’s be rebellious and vote this time.”



Source link

House passes $895B defense policy bill with 19.5% pay raise for junior troops


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Congress’ annual defense policy bill passed the House on Friday after a week of voting on more than 300 amendments, during which conservatives scored several victories on diversity, critical race theory and gender surgeries.

The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) authorizes funding for military priorities across the Department of Defense and Department of Energy, with that funding later coming in the form of a defense appropriations bill.

A marquee provision of this year’s bill is a 19.5% pay increase for junior enlisted troops.

The NDAA is traditionally a widely bipartisan effort, but the fight over culture war provisions alienated Democrats up to the White House, which issued statements opposing those and other similar measures in the bill.

MARATHON IN EVERY STATE: NAVY VET AND FORMER NYPD OFFICER RUNS ACROSS US TO HELP DESERVING NONPROFIT

Lloyd Austin and Mike Johnson

House Speaker Mike Johnson, right, ushered through an $895 billion NDAA, authorizing funding for the Department of Defense. (Getty Images)

Republicans have argued that rolling back measures on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and other progressive issues would help increase military readiness and turn around the dire recruitment crisis the U.S. military is currently dealing with.

Three amendments going after DEI roles in the armed forces passed this week: eliminating the role of Chief Diversity Officer, any DEI-related offices and their personnel and enacting a hiring freeze on any future such roles.

Another amendment that passed would prohibit promotion of critical race theory within the military, as well as any similar race-based theories.

Two more measures prohibit any Pentagon-related health policy from funding gender transition surgeries and transgender-related medical care. A third would prevent the Pentagon from funding any abortion-related services.

CONGRESS FEELING HEAT FROM GROUPS DEMANDING BAN ON CONTRACTS WITH CHINESE FIRM TAKING AMERICANS’ DNA

Al-Asad air base

U.S. Army soldiers train at al-Asad Air Base. The base is located in western Iraq. (Source: U.S. Army )

This year’s NDAA authorizes $895.2 billion in military spending, a $9 billion increase from fiscal 2024.

The underlying bill, which advanced in a 57 to 1 vote out of the House Armed Services Committee last month, looks to make significant improvements to service members’ quality of life. 

A cornerstone initiative of that is the pay raise for junior enlisted service members and a 4.5% increase for other military roles. 

“A very significant pay raise, particularly for our young enlisted, I think is really life-changing, and I hope will also be motivating for people to enlist and also to stay,” Rep. Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa., a member of the Armed Services Committee and a veteran herself, told Fox News Digital earlier this week.

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., another committee member and a retired general, said that military families – particularly in high-cost-of-living areas – had to resort to food banks to feed their families.

BIDEN CAMP JABS AT TRUMP’S ‘FAILED’ BUSINESS RECORD AS FORMER PRESIDENT LOOKS TO SWAY NATION’S TOP CEOS

Biden in Wisconsin

The Biden administration has expressed opposition to parts of the NDAA. (Screenshot/Biden speech)

“People working at fast-food restaurants are making more than our junior enlisted,” Bacon said. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Both also pushed back on the Biden administration’s opposition to the 19.5% pay raise.

“I can’t fathom why anybody wouldn’t want to give our men and women in uniform the pay that they deserve. And so, it’s a little bit frustrating,” Houlahan said.



Source link

Supreme Court strikes down federal ban on bump stocks


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a bump stock does not transform a firearm into an automatic weapon, striking down a federal rule that banned bump stocks. 

In a 6-3 decision, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote, “Congress has long restricted access to “‘machinegun[s],'” a category of firearms defined by the ability to “shoot, automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 

“Semiautomatic firearms, which require shooters to reengage the trigger for every shot, are not machineguns. This case asks whether a bump stock—an accessory for a semi- automatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire)—con- verts the rifle into a ‘machinegun.’ We hold that it does not,” he wrote. 

The case, Garland v. Cargill, asked the court whether a “bump stock” device is a “machine gun” as defined by federal law because it is designed and intended for use in converting a rifle into a weapon that fires “automatically more than one shot … by a single function of the trigger.” 

TEXAS GUN STORE OWNER SAYS SUPREME COURT SHOULD LIMIT GOVERNMENT ‘POWER’ IN ‘BUMP STOCK’ BAN CASE

A bump stock is displayed on March 15, 2019, in Harrisonburg, Va.

A bump stock is displayed on March 15, 2019, in Harrisonburg, Va. (AP Photo/Steve Helber, File)

The high court’s majority found that that statutory definition of a “machinegun” is any weapon capable of firing “automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 

“We hold that a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it cannot fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger.’ And, even if it could, it would not do so ‘automatically,'” Thomas wrote. 

“ATF therefore exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a Rule that classifies bump stocks as machineguns,” he said. 

After a 2017 mass shooting in Las Vegas that left 60 people dead and 500 more wounded, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) issued an interpretive rule concluding that “bump stocks” are machine guns.

“This tragedy created tremendous political pressure to outlaw bump stocks nationwide. Within days, Members of Congress proposed bills to ban bump stocks and other devices ‘designed to accelerate the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle,’” Thomas wrote in Thursday’s opinion.

The Trump administration initiated a ban on the devices — reversing earlier regulations — and President Biden’s Justice Department defended it in court. 

READ THE SUPREME COURT OPINION – APP USERS, CLICK HERE:

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented from the majority saying, “the Court puts bump stocks back in civilian hands. To do so, it casts aside Congress’s definition of “machinegun” and seizes upon one that is inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text and unsupported by context or purpose.”

“When I see a bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck. A bump-stock-equipped semiautomatic rifle fires ‘automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. Because I, like Congress, call that a machinegun, I respectfully dissent,” she wrote. 

NYC SHOP OWNER WITH CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT FACES 7 YEARS FOR INADVERTENTLY SHOOTING WOULD-BE THIEF

supreme court exterior

FILE – The U.S. Supreme Court is seen, Nov. 15, 2023, in Washington.  (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib, File)

A bump stock is an attachment that replaces a semi-automatic weapon’s standard stock, the part of the long weapon that rests on the shoulder.

Michael Cargill, owner of Central Texas Gun Works, sued the government after he was forced to surrender several “bump stocks” under the ATF’s rule. He says the agency overstepped its administrative authority to impose a ban, absent any congressional action.

“It really goes back to … freedom,” Cargill said in an interview with Fox News Digital. “And it goes back to just the basics of something that my customers and myself legally purchase. The government should not have that power, that authority in an administrative agency … to come back and ban that. You know, something that Congress has not banned. That’s going to be a job that’s reserved for Congress,” 

JAN 6 RIOTERS, ABORTION, GUN RIGHTS: A LOOK AHEAD AT LANDMARK CASES SCOTUS WILL HEAR IN 2024

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range

Vince Warner fires an AK-47 with a bump stock installed at Good Guys Gun and Range on Feb. 21, 2018, in Orem, Utah.  (George Frey/Getty Images)

Bump stocks came into circulation early this century, as one of a number of devices that can be attached to semi-automatic weapons.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

As the shooter applies forward thrust on the barrel, the device harnesses the recoil energy so that the trigger will “bump” against the stationary finger, which then allows another round to be fired. The effect is more rapid shots than with a standard stock.

The ATF says more than a half-million bump stocks were in circulation when the federal ban came into effect five years ago, requiring them to be turned in or destroyed. 



Source link

Iowa Dem scrubbed anti-Trump tweets from X account to appear more moderate, Republicans charge


A Democrat running in a competitive Iowa district scrubbed his X account of dozens of anti-Trump and pro-Biden posts prior to winning the congressional primary earlier this month, according to archival website information found by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).

Combat veteran and former USDA official Lanon Baccam won Iowa’s Third Congressional District Democratic nomination on June 4 in a landslide over rival Melissa Vine. He now faces Republican Zach Nunn in November. A veteran of Democratic political campaigns, Baccam previously served as President Biden’s Iowa deputy state director in addition to earlier work on the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and for Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and other Democratic campaigns and causes.

But in what the NRCC says is a move to appear more moderate, Baccam scrubbed his X account of numerous partisan posts which remain accessible online through the archival site Wayback Machine.

“It’s clear Lanon Baccam is desperately trying to run from his past as a paid political activist, hide his extreme stances and lie to the voters of Iowa,” National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) spokesperson Mike Marinella told Fox News Digital about the scrubbed posts. “Voters deserve to know the real Lanon Baccam outside his phony campaign ads and tampered-with social media.”

“We’re within my heavy-whipping-cream’s expiration days to the election,” one scrubbed post read. “Make a plan to vote now and you can toss out Trump when I toss this in the trash.”

Another post read, “Joe Biden will be a commander in chief who understands and supports our veterans, service members, and military families when confronted with the hardest situations. A little empathy goes a long way, especially when none exists currently with the President.”

IOWA GOP REP NUNN WILL FACE DEMOCRAT BACCAM IN GENERAL ELECTION FOR CD-3

campaign photo for Lanon Baccam, Iowa Democrat

Iowas 3rd District U.S. House Democrat nominee, Lanon Baccam. (Lanon Baccam)

As of June 13, Baccam’s account has no mention of former President Trump or President Biden, appearing to distance the candidate online from both the Republican and Democratic nominee for president in the General Election.

When reached for comment, Baccam offered the following statement: “From helping veterans transition to careers in agriculture, to implementing critical investments in our communities and expanding access to rural broadband, I’m proud of the work we accomplished at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. As a rural Iowa native, combat veteran, and public servant, I’ve dedicated my life to helping working families get ahead and strengthening our communities. That’s why I’m running for Congress and it’s exactly what I’ll continue to do if elected.”

REPUBLICANS FLIP CRUCIAL IOWA HOUSE SEAT RED WITH ZACH NUNN’S WIN

voting booths lined up in stock photo

Democrat Lanon Baccam is challenging Republican incumbent Rep. Zach Nunn in Iowa’s Third Congressional District. (PAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP via Getty Images)

TRUMP, BIDEN FACE TESTS IN FINAL 2024 PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES

Nunn flipped Iowa’s 3rd Congressional District from blue to red in 2022. Democrats are keen to take the seat back before Nunn’s power of incumbency increases with multiple terms.



Source link

Trump says there ‘could be’ alien life forms, but it’s ‘not my thing’


Former President Trump talked at length about his beliefs regarding outer space and the existence of aliens on a podcast this week.

While appearing on YouTuber Logan Paul’s talk show “Impaulsive,” Trump was asked what information he was given access to regarding extraterrestrials.

“I met with pilots [who looked] like beautiful Tom Cruise but taller — handsome, perfect, people,” Trump told Paul, recalling one pilot telling him, “‘Sir, there was something there that was round in form and going like four times faster than my super jet fighter plane.'”

“And I looked at these guys, and they really mean it,” Trump added.

DONALD TRUMP PRAISES ‘ONE-OF-A-KIND’ UFC CEO DANA WHITE: ‘SOMEBODY YOU REALLY HAVE TO RESPECT’

Donald Trump

Republican presidential candidate former President Trump gives remarks to the press at the National Republican Senatorial Committee building in Washington, D.C. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Despite the testimony from elite pilots, Trump said he would not call himself a believer in aliens.

Trump told Paul, “Am I a believer? No, I probably I can’t say I am. But I have met with people that are serious people that say there’s some really strange things that they see flying around out there.”

TRUMP PREDICTS THERE’S A ‘10% CHANCE’ CNN WILL BE FAIR TO HIM AT FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

Logan Paul

Logan Paul attends the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit 2024 Issue Release and 60th Anniversary Celebration at Hard Rock Hotel New York in New York City. (Mike Coppola/Getty Images for Sports Illustrated Swimsuit)

The former president also made a brief joke about illegal immigration, telling Paul that he was more concerned about “illegal aliens” at the southern border than extraterrestrials. 

“When you say aliens, I say, ‘Are they illegal aliens?’” Trump quipped. “These [UFOs] might be illegal, but we don’t want to test them.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

DOnald Trump eclipse

Then-President Trump looks up at the partial solar eclipse from the balcony of the White House in Washington, D.C. (NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images)

The former president’s representatives initially contacted Paul’s team and requested the sit down, a source familiar with the matter told Fox News Digital. 

Paul’s team also contacted President Biden’s representatives and invited him to be a guest on a future episode of the podcast, the source said.

Fox News’ Chantz Martin contributed to this report.



Source link

Secret Service to brief Congress on clash between agents protecting VP Harris


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Secret Service officials will give a bipartisan briefing to Congress to answer questions about training and recruiting issues regarding an agent on Vice President Kamala Harris’s protective detail who attacked her supervisor. 

The briefing will be on June 21, in response to a letter from House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, R-Ky. 

“In response to the letter received from Chairman James Comer, the U.S. Secret Service will comply with the House Oversight Committee’s request for a briefing on the topics outlined in the publicly available letter dated May 30, 2024,” a Secret Service spokesperson told Fox News Digital. 

Comer wrote to U.S. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle, an appointee of President Biden

I FIND IT PUZZLING, QUITE CONCERNING THAT RFK JR. DOES NOT HAVE SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION: NICOLE PARKER

House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer.

House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chairman James Comer. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

“It was recently reported that a Secret Service agent, tasked with protecting Vice President Kamala Harris, physically attacked her superior (and the commanding agent in charge) and other agents trying to subdue her while on duty at Joint Base Andrews and assigned to the Vice President’s protective detail,” Comer wrote to Cheatle.

The Secret Service has confirmed in other media accounts the altercation occurred at about 9 a.m. on April 22 at Joint Base Andrews in Prince George’s County, Maryland. The agent, who was ultimately escorted away in handcuffs, has been removed from the vice president’s detail. The Secret Service has described the incident as a “medical matter.”

IF TRUMP GOES TO PRISON AFTER GUILTY VERDICT, SECRET SERVICE WOULD HAVE TO GO WITH HIM

There may have been a number of incidents, according to a petition circulated within the agency by Secret Service personnel seeking a congressional investigation, according to a Bloomberg reporter. The agents asserted problems with inadequate training and a double standard in disciplinary actions. 

Vice President Kamala Harris

The L.A. Times recently reported on voter focus groups viewing Vice President Kamala Harris unfavorably. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

“This incident raised concerns within the agency about the hiring and screening process for this agent: specifically, whether previous incidents in her work history were overlooked during the hiring process as years of staff shortages had led the agency to lower once stricter standards as part of a diversity, equity and inclusion effort,” Comer’s letter to Cheatle continues. 

Comer asked Cheatle for a briefing for committee staff on or before June 13, so the Secret Service briefing will be a few days later. 

The Secret Service provides protection to the president, the vice president, their spouses and children. 

Secret Service agents in Washington, DC

Members of the Secret Service arrest a climate activist on Pennsylvania Avenue in front of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 7, 2023. (Mandel Ngan/AFP)

The Washington Examiner first reported the incident.

Real Clear Politics reported that the agent was acting “erratically” and punched him.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Joint Base Andrews is where Air Force One and Air Force Two transport the president and vice president. Harris was still at the vice president’s residence at the Naval Observatory when the altercation happened, and the confrontation did not delay her travel.





Source link

Trump and Hunter Biden guilty verdicts effect on voter sentiment probed in new poll


Join Fox News for access to this content

You have reached your maximum number of articles. Log in or create an account FREE of charge to continue reading.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

A new national poll suggests that the guilty verdicts against former President Trump in his recent criminal trial may have little impact on his 2024 election rematch with President Biden.

And the survey, from Monmouth University, also indicates that more voters agree than disagree with Trump’s conviction on 34 felony counts in the first trial of a former or current president in the nation’s history.

But a majority questioned in the poll say the charges against the former president were politically motivated.

Nearly half say the same thing about the trial of Hunter Biden, the president’s sole surviving son, which ended Tuesday with the younger Biden’s conviction on three counts tied to his October 2018 purchase and possession of a revolver while using illegal drugs.

WILL HUNTER BIDEN GUILTY VERDICTS IMPACT HIS FATHER’S REMATCH WITH TRUMP IN 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?

Donald Trump appears in Manhattan Criminal Court

Former President Trump appears in Manhattan Criminal Court in New York on May 30. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig, Pool)

Trump was found guilty late last month of all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in relation to payments during the 2016 election that he made to Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about his alleged affair with the adult film actress.

Prosecutors in the case argued that this amounted to illegally seeking to influence the 2016 election.

The Monmouth poll spotlights that the impact on the presidential election of the Trump verdicts is minimal, with both candidates continuing “to draw almost identical levels of support, although voter enthusiasm for this rematch has increased among both Republicans and Democrats.” 

WHO HAS THE SLIGHT EDGE IN A KEY NORTHEASTERN PRESIDENT ELECTION BATTLEGROUND?

According to the survey, just over four in 10 registered voters say they’ll either definitely or probably vote for the Democratic incumbent and in a separate question, a nearly identical number say they’ll definitely or probably vote for his Republican predecessor in the White House.

Forty-nine percent of those surveyed said they definitely won’t vote for Biden, with an identical number saying the same thing about Trump. 

Biden v Trump

President Biden and former President Trump. (AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson | Evan Vucci)

These results have not moved much since last fall in Monmouth national polling.

Trump for months has held a slight polling edge over Biden in most surveys in the crucial seven battleground states across the country that will likely decide the outcome of the presidential rematch. But Biden enjoys a fundraising advantage, and the upper hand when it comes to ground game operations in the key states.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Nearly half — 47% — of those questioned in the Monmouth survey said they agree with the jury’s guilty verdicts in Trump’s trial, with 34% disagreeing. 

That’s mostly in-line with other national surveys conducted since the end of the trial that indicated about half of those questioned approving of the verdicts, but that opinions of the former president remained stable.

Hunter Biden departs from federal court

Hunter Biden departs from federal court in Wilmington, Delaware, on Tuesday. (AP Photo/Matt Slocum)

Fifty-seven percent of those questioned in the Monmouth poll said that they thought the decision to bring Trump to trial was politically motivated. By comparison, only 48% thought that the charges against Hunter Biden were motivated by politics.

“Many Americans are skeptical about these high-profile trials and there is a clear partisan gap depending on which defendant we are talking about. Still, the results indicate Republicans have a higher level of distrust in our judicial process than Democrats do,” Monmouth University Polling Institute director Patrick Murray said.

The poll was conducted June 6-10, before Tuesday’s conviction of Hunter Biden, with 1,106 adults nationwide questioned by telephone. The survey’s overall sampling error is plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.



Source link

House GOP moves to name US coastal waters after Trump


FIRST ON FOX: A House GOP lawmaker is spearheading an effort to name the United States’ coastal waterways after former President Trump.

Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., is introducing a bill on Friday to rename the immediate waters surrounding the U.S., called the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), as the “Donald John Trump Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States.”

If passed, it would mandate the name change on any applicable laws, maps, documents and other records.

WILL HUNTER BIDEN GUILTY VERDICTS ROCK HIS FATHER’S REMATCH WITH TRUMP?

Donald Trump

A GOP-led bill would name U.S. coastal waters after Donald Trump. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

An EEZ refers to waterways immediately off a country’s coast where it can claim sole rights for fishing, drilling and other activities.

The U.S. has the largest EEZ in the world at 4,383,000 square miles.

Steube told Fox News Digital that Trump “cares about the strength and resilience of our oceans.”

WHO HAS THE SLIGHT EDGE IN A KEY NORTHEASTERN PRESIDENT ELECTION BATTLEGROUND?

Representative Greg Steube in Congress

Rep. Greg Steube introduced the bill in time for Trump’s birthday. (Patrick Semansky/AP Photo/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“During his time in office, President Trump took several commendable actions for our oceans as part of his work to make America strong, secure, and economically prosperous,” he said. “I’m honored to introduce legislation that will rename our coastal waters after President Trump and serve as a reminder of his many contributions to our nation for generations to come.”

His Friday bill introduction lines up with the former president’s 78th birthday.

The legislation is unlikely to be taken up by the Democrat-controlled Senate, but it’s evidence of Trump’s enduring influence within the Republican Party.

TRUMP RILES UP FIERY SWING STATE CROWD IN FIRST RALLY SINCE NEW YORK CONVICTION

The California coastline

The U.S.’s exclusive economic zone is the largest in the world. (Carol M. Highsmith/Buyenlarge/Getty Images)

It’s the second bill proposed this year to name an internationally used entity after Trump. 

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Pa., introduced a bill in April to rename Washington-Dulles International Airport to the Donald J. Trump International Airport.

A few days later, a group of Democrats responded with legislation to change the name of the federal prison in Miami to the Donald J. Trump Federal Correctional Institution.



Source link

Fox News Politics: Begging Her Pardon


Welcome to Fox News’ Politics newsletter with the latest political news from Washington D.C. and updates from the 2024 campaign trail. 

What’s happening…

– SCOTUS rules the abortion pill to stay legal, for now

– Senator Fetterman responsible for Maryland car accident

– Hillary Clinton endorses anti-squad Democrat

Hochul Hounded

Another lawmaker has urged New York’s governor to pardon former President Trump – this time, the call is coming from a Republican.

Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., penned a letter to Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Thursday, demanding she pardon former Trump following his conviction last month. 

The case “undermines the impartiality and credibility of our once venerable justice system and cannot be allowed to stand,” Tenney said.

The congresswoman also suggested Bragg might have broken the law in pursuing the case against Trump. Bragg “used a warped version of events to push the manufactured charges in The People v. Trump,” a decision that, at best, is “legally questionable, at worst it’s criminal,” she wrote. 

Tenney pointed out that a Democrat was among the first to urge her to pardon Trump.

“Even my Democratic colleague from Minnesota, Congressman Dean Phillips, has called on you to pardon President Trump. Pardoning President Trump is not a partisan issue, it’s an American issue that is necessary to preserve the integrity of our legal system.”

In other pardon news, President Biden reiterated Thursday that he would not pardon his son after a Delaware jury found him guilty of federal crimes. And Biden said he wouldn’t commute Hunter’s sentence — which has not been determined yet.

KAthy Hochul in Albany

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks during the State of the State address in Albany, N.Y., Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

White House

LOCKING US IN: Biden to sign 10-year security agreement with Ukraine at G-7 summit …Read more

‘PLAYED A ROLE’: Blinken silent on past efforts to discredit Hunter Biden laptop after feds enter into evidence …Read more

‘GRAVE DAMAGE’: Biden has returned US to a ‘pre-911 posture’ on the border: expert …Read more

IT’S ALL UP FROM HERE: NASA boss talks future of American space travel …Read more

THE PILL STAYS: Supreme Court rules in abortion medication case, finds group lacked standing to challenge FDA approval …Read more

Capitol Hill

‘NO JUICING JOE’: Presidents would have to share their medicine cabinet …Read more

‘HIGH RATE OF SPEED’: Fetterman responsible for weekend car accident in Maryland …Read more

‘YOUR SOLEMN DUTY’: Another House member calls on New York Democratic Gov. Hochul to pardon Trump …Read more

‘PARTISAN SCHEME’: House committee serves subpoenas to Biden’s entire cabinet over alleged ‘partisan’ election ‘scheme’ …Read more

DUE PROCESS: Dozens of GOP senators condemn Trump ‘show trial’ in scathing rebuke …Read more

Tales from the Campaign Trail

LITTLE IMPACT: Trump and Hunter Biden convictions unlikely to rock White House rematch: poll …Read more

‘SOUNDS AUTHENTIC’: Charlamagne tha God lambasts Democrats for bad messaging …Read more

READING THE TEA LEAVES: Potential candidates for Supreme Court under a second Donald Trump term …Read more

‘FRAUD’: Biden camp jabs at Trump’s ‘failed’ business record ahead of major CEO meeting …Read more

SNUBBING THE SQUAD: Hillary Clinton makes surprise endorsement in competitive House primary …Read more

‘BIGGEST SCAM EVER’: WATCH: Trump rally draws swing state voters angry over ‘sham’ conviction …Read more

Trials and Tribulations

‘LAST DITCH EFFORT’: Fani Willis files ‘last ditch effort’ to get Trump case back on track …Read more

A Palestinian fighter from the armed wing of Hamas takes part in a military parade

A terrorist from Hamas takes part in a military parade to mark the anniversary of the 2014 war with Israel, near the border in the central Gaza Strip on July 19, 2023. (Reuters/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa/File Photo)

Across America

‘LONG LIVE HAMAS’: Tough punishments sought for pro-Hamas rioters who deface statues …Read more

LEFT-WING LAYOFFS: Southern Poverty Law Center reportedly cuts 60 jobs …Read more

BOOK BIAS?: NY Times bestseller list ‘politically biased’ according to new study …Read more

‘EVERYTHING OK?’: WATCH: Nathan Wade halts CNN interview when asked about Fani Willis affair timeline …Read more

Subscribe now to get Fox News Politics newsletter in your inbox.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.



Source link