Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn’t Matter Without ‘Settled Law’

Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn't Matter Without 'Settled Law' Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn't Matter Without 'Settled Law' Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

By Jay Clemons | Friday, 21 October 2022 09:30 PM EDT

Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and onetime legal counsel to former President Donald Trump, says the House committee investigating the January 6, 2021, unrest at the Capitol has no business ordering a subpoena for Trump, given how the federal courts have yet to rule on how "executive privilege" applies to contempt-of-Congress proceedings.

"If we were a country of laws, like we used to be," the Jan. 6 committee's subpoena would have minimal impact on Trump, Giuliani told Newsmax Friday evening, while appearing on "Eric Bolling The Balance."

"The courts should have worked out the law" in terms of the "full extent of executive privilege" before the Jan. 6 hearings took place, added Giuliani.

"This is not settled law," lamented Giuliani, while adding that no Democrat held in contempt has ever "been put in prison — let alone fined."

Giuliani offered another line of rationale for Trump keeping his options open, testimony-wise, while the courts potentially work through "executive privilege" matters, related to the Jan. 6 incident.

"The Jan. 6 committee is a [group] made up of proven liars," said Giuliani, while claiming that each Democrat member of the Jan. 6 panel touted the "myth" of Russian collusion during President Trump's four-year tenure in office.

Giuliani asserts the Democrat committee members also fought to conceal the truth about Hunter Biden's now-infamous laptop back in October 2020 — just weeks before the Trump-Biden presidential battle.

"Who was telling the truth about that? Trump was. Trump was right about Russian collusion — there was none," says Giuliani.

The way Giuliani sees it, Trump was also right about Hunter Biden's laptop being independently verified and "no quid pro quo" taking place with Ukraine — which was the primary reason for Trump's first impeachment hearing.

As such, Giuliani cannot fathom how the Jan. 6 committee has been given so much power to investigate "an insurrection without a single person there having a gun. Exactly how are you going to overthrow a government without a gun? … If it wasn't so serious, it'd be a joke."

Giuliani also found the Friday jail sentence handed down to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon (four months) to be similarly laughable.

"It's an example of the police state we live in," said Giuliani.

From Giuliani's perspective, Bannon was condemned before the courts had a chance to rule on what constitutes a crime with contempt-of-Congress charges, as it pertains to executive privilege.

"It's a case that [should have been appealed] through the Supreme Court before anyone decides to put him in prison," reasoned Giuliani. "How many Democrats have been held in contempt, and zero happens" to them?

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Save America PAC Responds to Trump’s Jan. 6 Panel Subpoena

Save America PAC Responds to Trump's Jan. 6 Panel Subpoena

(Newsmax/"Saturday Report")

By Luca Cacciatore | Friday, 21 October 2022 08:04 PM EDT

Donald Trump's Save America PAC rushed to his defense on Friday, issuing a fundraising email that condemns the House Jan. 6 committee's decision to subpoena the former president.

"The January 6th Unselect Committee just voted to SUBPOENA the 45th President of the United States. 18 DAYS before the Midterm Elections, America is truly a Nation in decline," the email read.

"Instead of using their final days in power to better America, the Democrats are coming after OUR President and demeaning our great Country at YOUR expense. They have no interest in leading our great Nation. They are bitter, power-hungry, and desperate to win in November," it added.

The political action committee also pointed out past probes into Trump that it said have come up empty, including the Robert Mueller investigation, two impeachment trials and the alleged FBI spying on his 2016 presidential campaign.

"Stand with President Trump," the message further pleads.

The fundraising email serves as the second response directly affiliated with the former president to the Jan. 6 panel, which issued a letter to Trump's lawyers demanding his testimony under oath by Nov. 14.

In addition, the committee is seeking from Trump all sensitive documents and private communications with relevant individuals related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

"We recognize that a subpoena to a former president is a significant and historic action," wrote committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and Vice Chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo. "We do not take this action lightly."

"In short, you were at the center of the first and only effort by any U.S. president to overturn an election and obstruct the peaceful transition of power, ultimately culminating in a bloody attack on our own Capitol and on the Congress itself," the two wrote.

Earlier Friday, Trump lawyer David Warrington issued a statement condemning the subpoena, The Associated Press reported.

"We understand that, once again, flouting norms and appropriate and customary process, the committee has publicly released a copy of its subpoena," Warrington said. "As with any similar matter, we will review and analyze it and will respond as appropriate to this unprecedented action."

Original Article

Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe

Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaks at the U.S. Capitol. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

By Nicole Wells | Friday, 21 October 2022 07:05 PM EDT

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on Friday asked the Supreme Court to step in and shield him from testifying before the Atlanta-based special grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump's alleged interference in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

According to CNN, the Palmetto State Republican filed the emergency request after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday ruled that the grand jury could compel his testimony, siding with a lower court decision.

While Graham contends that his actions in Georgia after the 2020 election were protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, the three-judge appellate panel found that "communications and coordination with the Trump campaign regarding its post-election efforts in Georgia, public statements regarding the 2020 election, and efforts to 'cajole' or 'exhort' Georgia election officials" are not constitutionally protected.

Friday's appeal was filed with Justice Clarence Thomas, who oversees the 11th Circuit, according to CNN, and Thomas is likely to refer the matter to the full court.

The investigation into alleged efforts by Trump and his supporters to change the 2020 election results is being led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

According to CNN, an hour-long phone call from Trump to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in January 2021 triggered the investigation. Trump allegedly asked Raffensperger to "find" the votes needed for him to win the state.

On Friday, Graham asked the justices to halt the lower court order while legal challenges unfold.

"This Court's action is necessary to allow this appeal to be heard before it becomes moot — before, that is, Senator Graham suffers the constitutional injury this appeal is meant to avoid," the filing said.

Graham claims in the new court filing that the information from officials in Georgia was necessary to perform his legislative duties and should be protected by the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution.

As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Graham said that he is tasked with "reviewing election-related issues" and the information was necessary for an "impending vote on certifying the election."

"After the phone calls, Senator Graham relied on the information gained from the calls both to vote Joe Biden the 'legitimate President of the United States' and to co-sponsor legislation to amend the Electoral Count Act," the filing said.

Original Article

Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has ‘Blank Check’ With Biden in Power

Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has 'Blank Check' With Biden in Power Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has 'Blank Check' With Biden in Power (Newsmax/"The Chris Salcedo Show")

By Solange Reyner | Friday, 21 October 2022 05:34 PM EDT

Iran has a "blank check" to do whatever it wants with President Joe Biden in power, including directly engaging on the ground in Crimea supporting Russian drone attacks on Ukraine's power stations and other key infrastructure, says Retired Brig. Air Force Gen. Blaine Holt.

"They've got a blank check to do whatever they'd like to do," Holt, the former deputy U.S. military representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, said Friday during an appearance on Newsmax TV's "The Chris Salcedo Show."

"The drones which they say, 'Oh, they're not Iranian,' they have a very unique visual signature. That that's what it is and now they've got advisers on the ground so they're in the war, they're aligned with Russia. What's interesting here is this is the same organization we wanted the Russians to broker a nuclear peace deal with and we were going to pay them millions of bucks and this is the respect they give the sanctions that are imposed by UN Security Council Resolution? So, I think the whole thing is actually quite laughable."

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters that Iran has sent a "relatively small number" of personnel to Crimea, a part of Ukraine unilaterally annexed by Russia in contravention of international law in 2014, to assist Russian troops in launching Iranian-made drones against Ukraine. Members of a branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps were dispatched to assist Russian forces in using the drones, according to the British government.

The revelation of the U.S. intelligence finding comes as the Biden administration seeks to mount international pressure on Tehran to pull back from helping Russia as it bombards soft Ukrainian civilian targets with the help of Iranian-made drones.

The Russians in recent days have increasingly turned to the Iranian-supplied drones, as well as Kalibr and Iskander cruise missiles, to carry out a barrage of attacks against Ukrainian infrastructure and non-military targets. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said this week that Russian forces have destroyed 30% of Ukraine’s power stations since Oct. 10.

Retired Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said the larger warfare is being missed, though, as China is "ganging up" with Russia to remove the dollar as the fiat currency the world uses for energy and "we're just kind of letting it happen," he told Salcedo.

"There's a long-term strategy that the Chinese and Russians are doing to undermine our economic power. Much of our ability to do things globally is because we are the big dog on the block, President Trump recognized that. … I think it's very clear at this point, the more they can cooperate on energy and get the Saudis to come over to their side, which we've seen, the more chances of the dollar being removed, taking the bottom out of the dollar, taking the bottom out of our buying power, and therefore weakening us across the board. It's this economic warfare that we're not paying sufficient attention to."

Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.

Original Article

Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China

Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China Mar-a-Lago (Getty Images)

Friday, 21 October 2022 05:02 PM EDT

Highly sensitive intelligence on Iran and China was in some of the documents recovered by the FBI during an August search of former U.S. President Donald Trump's home in Florida, The Washington Post reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.

They included secret documents that described intelligence work regarding China and at least one of them described Iran's missile program, the report said, adding that the documents were considered to be among the most sensitive in the materials seized by the FBI.

The release of information in these documents would pose multiple risks, including endangering people helping U.S. intelligence efforts and compromising collection efforts, the newspaper cited experts as saying.

The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether Trump broke the law by taking government records, including about 100 classified documents, to his Florida estate after leaving office in January 2021.

The department is also looking into whether Trump or his team obstructed justice when the FBI sent agents to search his home, and has warned that more classified documents may still be missing.

Representatives for Trump did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the newspaper report. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for confirmation of the Post report.

Original Article

Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms

Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., speaks at a Herschel Walker campaign event in Carrollton, Georgia. (Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

By Jay Clemons | Friday, 21 October 2022 04:11 PM EDT

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., has a midterm elections prediction that goes beyond the Republicans simply breaking the 50-all tie in the Senate.

Republicans could get a net positive of five Senate seats next month, an assessment that would give the GOP a plus-10 advantage in the Senate.

"It starts right here. We're going to get 52 Republican senators. We have to win here," Scott said Thursday at a campaign event in North Carolina, while stumping for Rep. Ted Budd, R-N.C., who's running for a U.S. Senate seat.

"I think we can get 53, 54, 55. The energy is on our side. People are fed up with the Biden agenda," Scott added.

Scott, who is also the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), has been more optimistic about the Republicans' chances in November than Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who recently drew criticism from within his own party after being lukewarm about the Senate GOP's electoral prospects.

The 52-to-55-seat prediction from Scott runs in direct contrast to Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Last month, Peters professed the possibility of the Senate Democrats holding 52 seats when Congress reconvenes in January.

In a recent New York Times-Siena College poll, the majority of survey respondents favored the Republicans' message/track record for handling the majority — by a 34-point margin (64% Republicans/30% Democrats).

For that same poll, the respondents identified the U.S. economy/high inflation as the No. 1 issue heading into the midterms.

Earlier this month on Newsmax, Dick Morris, a political strategist, best-selling author, and adviser to former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, said a GOP "sweep" of the battleground races within the Senate chamber could happen.

Morris, the author of "The Return: Trump's Big 2024 Comeback," said on "Rob Schmitt Tonight" that his internal polling shows some of the "sleeper races" leaning toward the GOP candidates.

And Morris believes that three GOP candidates — Dr. Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania), Blake Masters (Arizona), and Herschel Walker (Georgia) — will deliver a Senate victory for the Republicans.

"If Oz wins, as I think he can, and we picked up at least one of those other two seats — like Masters' — I think that we can win, and we'll win with 52 or 53 seats," Morris said. "But I want to stress that it is possible this year to just clean up. We could win all of these races because the polling is so pro-Democrat in its bias."

Original Article

Federal Judge makes decision in Steve Bannon case

Steve Bannon, center, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump and convicted of contempt of Congress, accompanied by his attorneys David Schoen, left, and Evan Corcoran, right, speaks to the media as he leaves the federal courthouse on Friday, Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington. Bannon was sentenced to 4 months behind bars for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena. ( AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Steve Bannon, center, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump and convicted of contempt of Congress, accompanied by his attorneys David Schoen, left, and Evan Corcoran, right, speaks to the media as he leaves the federal courthouse on Friday, Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington. Bannon was sentenced to 4 months behind bars for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena. ( AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Caitlin Sinclair – NY Political Correspondent
UPDATED 9:05 AM PT – Friday, October 21, 2022

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was sentenced to 4 months in prison and a $6,500 fine in D.C. federal court Friday. The judge will allow Bannon to appeal before serving that sentence.

Bannon was convicted in July on two contempt of Congress charges for ignoring subpoenas from the House committee investigating January 6th.

Prior to sentencing, a stoic and steadfast Bannon made a comment to reporters as supporters surrounded the courthouse.

“Remember, this illegitimate regime, their judgment day is on 8 November, when the Biden administration ends … By the way, and remember: Take down the CCP.”

The House panel had sought Bannon’s testimony over his involvement in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Bannon has yet to testify or provide any documents to the committee, prosecutors wrote.

The defense, meanwhile, said he wasn’t acting in bad faith, but trying to avoid running afoul of executive privilege objections Trump had raised when Bannon was first served with a committee subpoena last year. The former presidential adviser said he wanted a Trump lawyer in the room, but the committee wouldn’t allow it.

Banon spoke outside the courtroom after the hearing saying:

“I respect the judge. The sentence he came down with today is his decision. … I’ve been totally respectful of this entire process on the legal side,”

Friday’s sentencing took place one year to the day after the House voted to hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the subpoena.

Original Article Oann

Online School Put US Kids Behind; Some Adults Have Regrets

Online School Put US Kids Behind; Some Adults Have Regrets schools closed written on a blackboard (Dreamstime)

BIANCA VÁZQUEZ TONESS and JOCELYN GECKER Friday, 21 October 2022 03:43 PM EDT

Vivian Kargbo thought her daughter’s Boston school district was doing the right thing when officials kept classrooms closed for most students for more than a year.

Kargbo, a caregiver for hospice patients, didn't want to risk them getting COVID-19. And extending pandemic school closures through the spring of 2021 is what many in her community said was best to keep kids and adults safe.

But her daughter became depressed and stopped doing school work or paying attention to online classes. The former honor-roll student failed nearly all of her eighth grade courses.

“She’s behind,” said Kargbo, whose daughter is now in tenth grade. “It didn’t work at all. Knowing what I know now, I would say they should have put them in school.”

Preliminary test scores around the country confirm what Kargbo witnessed: The longer many students studied remotely, the less they learned. Some educators and parents are questioning decisions in cities from Boston to Chicago to Los Angeles to remain online long after clear evidence emerged that schools weren’t COVID-19 super-spreaders — and months after life-saving adult vaccines became widely available.

There are fears for the futures of students who don’t catch up. They run the risk of never learning to read, long a precursor for dropping out of school. They might never master simple algebra, putting science and tech fields out of reach. The pandemic decline in college attendance could continue to accelerate, crippling the U.S. economy.

In a sign of how inflammatory the debate has become, there’s sharp disagreement among educators, school leaders and parents even about how to label the problems created by online school. “Learning loss” has become a lightning rod. Some fear the term might brand struggling students or cast blame on teachers, and they say it overlooks the need to save lives during a pandemic.

Regardless of what it’s called, the casualties of Zoom school are real.

The scale of the problem and the challenges in addressing it were apparent in Associated Press interviews with nearly 50 school leaders, teachers, parents and health officials, who struggled to agree on a way forward.

Some public health officials and educators warned against second-guessing the school closures for a virus that killed over a million people in the U.S. More than 200,000 children lost at least one parent.

“It is very easy with hindsight to say, ‘Oh, learning loss, we should have opened.’ People forget how many people died,” said Austin Beutner, former superintendent in Los Angeles, where students were online from mid-March 2020 until the start of hybrid instruction in April 2021.

The question isn’t merely academic.

School closures continued last year because of teacher shortages and COVID-19 spread. It’s conceivable another pandemic might emerge — or a different crisis.

But there’s another reason for asking what lessons have been learned: the kids who have fallen behind. Some third graders struggle to sound out words. Some ninth graders have given up on school because they feel so behind they can’t catch up. The future of American children hangs in the balance.

Many adults are pushing to move on, to stop talking about the impact of the pandemic — especially learning loss.

“As crazy as this sounds now, I’m afraid people are going to forget about the pandemic,” said Jason Kamras, superintendent in Richmond, Virginia. "People will say, ‘That was two years ago. Get over it.’”

When COVID-19 first reached the U.S., scientists didn’t fully understand how it spread or whether it was harmful to children. American schools, like most around the world, understandably shuttered in March 2020.

That summer, scientists learned kids didn’t face the same risks as adults, but experts couldn’t decide how to operate schools safely — or whether it was even possible.

It was already clear that remote learning was devastating for many young people. But did the risks of social isolation and falling behind outweigh the risks of children, school staff and families catching the virus?

The tradeoffs differed depending on how vulnerable a community felt. Black and Latino people, who historically had less access to health care, remain nearly twice as likely to die of COVID-19 than white people. Parents in those communities often had deep-rooted doubts about whether schools could keep their children safe.

Politics was a factor, too. Districts that reopened in person tended to be in areas that voted for President Donald Trump or had largely white populations.

By winter, studies showed schools weren’t contributing to increased COVID-19 spread in the community. Classes with masked students and distancing could be conducted safely, growing evidence said. President Joe Biden prioritized reopening schools when he took office in January 2021, and once the COVID-19 vaccine was available, some Democratic-leaning districts started to reopen.

Yet many schools stayed closed well into the spring, including in California, where the state’s powerful teachers unions fought returning to classrooms, citing lack of safety protocols.

In Chicago, after a six-week standoff with the teachers union, the district started bringing students back on a hybrid schedule just before spring 2021. It wasn’t until the fall that students were back in school full time.

Marla Williams initially supported Chicago Public Schools' decision to instruct students online during the fall of 2020. Williams, a single mother, has asthma, as do her two children. While she was working, she enlisted her father, a retired teacher, to supervise her children’s studies.

Her father would log into his grandson’s classes from his suburban home and try to monitor what was happening. But it didn’t work.

Her son lost motivation and wouldn’t do his assignments. Once he went back on a hybrid schedule in spring 2021, he started doing well again, Williams said.

“I wish we’d been in person earlier,” she said. “Other schools seemed to be doing it successfully.”

Officials were divided in Chicago. The city Department of Public Health advocated reopening schools months earlier, in the fall of 2020. The commissioner, Dr. Allison Arwady, said they felt the risk of missing education was higher than the risk of COVID-19. Others, such as the director of the Institute for Global Health at Northwestern University, advocated for staying remote.

“I think the answer on that has been settled fairly clearly, especially once we had vaccines available,” Arwady said. “I’m concerned about the loss that has occurred.”

From March 2020 to June 2021, the average student in Chicago lost 21 weeks of learning in reading and 20 weeks in math, equivalent to missing half a year of school, according to Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab, which analyzed data from a widely used test called MAP to estimate learning loss for every U.S. school district.

Nationally, kids whose schools met mostly online in the 2020-2021 school year performed 13 percentage points lower in math and 8 percentage points lower in reading compared with schools meeting mostly in person, according to a 2022 study by Brown University economist Emily Oster.

The setbacks have some grappling with regret.

“I can’t imagine a situation where we would close schools again, unless there’s a virus attacking kids,” said Eric Conti, superintendent for Burlington, Massachusetts, a 3,400-student district outside Boston. His students alternated between online and in-person learning from the fall of 2020 until the next spring. “It’s going to be a very high bar.”

Dallas Superintendent Stephanie Elizalde initially disagreed with the Texas governor’s push to reopen schools in the fall of 2020. “But it was absolutely the right thing to do,” she said.

Some school officials said they lacked the expertise to decide whether it was safe to open schools.

“Schools should never have been placed in a situation where we have choice,” said Tony Wold, former associate superintendent of West Contra Costa Unified School District, east of San Francisco. “With lessons learned, when you have a public health pandemic, there needs to be a single voice.”

Still, many school officials said with hindsight they’d make the same decision to keep schools online well into 2021. Only two superintendents said they’d likely make a different decision if there were another pandemic that was not particularly dangerous to children.

In some communities, demographics and the historic underinvestment in schools loomed large, superintendents said. In the South, Black Americans’ fear of the virus was sometimes coupled with mistrust of schools rooted in segregation. Cities from Atlanta to Nashville to Jackson, Mississippi, shuttered schools — in some cases, for nearly all of the 2020-2021 school year.

In Clayton County, Georgia, home to the state’s highest percentage of Black residents, schools chief Morcease Beasley said he knew closing schools would have a devastating impact, but the fear in his community was overwhelming.

“I knew teachers couldn’t teach if they were that scared, and students couldn’t learn,” he said.

Rhode Island was an outlier among liberal-leaning coastal states when it ordered schools to reopen in person in the fall of 2020. “We can’t do this to our kids,” state education chief Angélica Infante-Green remembers thinking after watching students turn off cameras or log in from under blankets in bed. “This is not OK.”

But in the predominantly Latino and Black Rhode Island community of Central Falls, more than three-quarters of students stayed home to study remotely.

To address parent distrust, officials tracked COVID-19 cases among school-aged Central Falls residents. They met with families to show them the kids catching the virus were in remote learning — and they weren’t learning as much as students in school. It worked.

Among teachers, there’s some dispute about online learning's impact on children. But many fear some students will be scarred for years.

“Should we have reopened earlier? Absolutely,” said California teacher Sarah Curry. She initially favored school closings in her rural Central Valley district, but grew frustrated with the duration of distance learning. She taught pre-kindergarten and found it impossible to maintain attention spans online.

One of her biggest regrets: that teachers who wanted to return to classrooms had little choice in the matter.

But the nation’s 3 million public school teachers are far from a monolith. Many lost loved ones to COVID-19, battled mental health challenges of their own or feared catching the virus.

Jessica Cross, who taught ninth grade math on Chicago’s west side at Phoenix Military Academy, feels her school reopened too soon.

“I didn’t feel entirely safe,” she said. Mask rules were good in theory, but not all students wore them properly. She said safety should come before academics.

“Ultimately, I still feel that remote learning was really the only thing to do,” Cross said.

A representative from the American Federation of Teachers declined in an interview to address whether the union regrets the positions teachers took against reopening schools.

“If we start to play the blame game," said Fedrick Ingram, AFT’s secretary-treasurer, “we get into the political fray of trying to determine if teachers did a good job or not. And I don’t think that’s fair.”

Regrets or no, experts agree: America’s kids need more from adults if they’re going to be made whole.

The country needs “ideally, a reinvention of public education as we know it,” Los Angeles Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said. Students need more days in school and smaller classes.

Short of extending the school year, experts say intensive tutoring is the most efficient way to help students catch up. Saturday school or doubling up on math or reading during a regular school day would also help.

Too few school districts have made those investments, Harvard economist Tom Kane said. Summer school is insufficient, Kane says — it’s voluntary, and many parents don’t sign up.

Adding school time for students is politically impossible in many cities. In Los Angeles, the teachers union filed a complaint after the district scheduled four optional school days for students to recoup learning. The school board in Richmond rejected a move to an all-year school calendar.

There are exceptions: Atlanta extended the school day 30 minutes for three years. Hopewell Schools in Virginia moved to year-round schooling last year.

Even the federal government’s record education spending isn’t enough for the scope of kids’ academic setbacks, according to the American Educational Research Association. Researchers there estimate it will cost $700 billion to offset learning loss for America’s schoolchildren – more than three times the $190 billion allocated to schools.

“We need something on the scale of the Marshall Plan for education,” said Kamras, the Richmond superintendent. “Anything short of that and we’re going to see this blip in outcomes become permanent for a generation of children — and that would be criminal.”

Gecker reported from San Francisco. Collin Binkley in Washington, D.C., Sharon Lurye in New Orleans, Arleigh Rodgers in Indianapolis, Claire Savage in Chicago and Brooke Schultz in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.

Rodgers, Savage and Schultz are corps members for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.

If Indiana-1 Is Toss-Up, Dems in Big Trouble Nationwide

If Indiana-1 Is Toss-Up, Dems In Big Trouble Nationwide (Newsmax/"National Report")

John Gizzi By John Gizzi Friday, 21 October 2022 02:58 PM EDT Current | Bio | Archive

The recent reports of disparate figures in the punditocracy that Democrat Rep. Frank Mrvan now is in a toss-up race has clearly sent a warning message to Democrats everywhere.

Not since Republican Rep. Harry Rowbottom was unseated in 1930 has this Gary-based, blue-collar heavy district failed to resoundingly elect a Democrat U.S. representative.

But three weeks before the election, Mrvan finds himself locked in a tight battle with Republican opponent and former U.S. Air Force Major Jennifer-Ruth Green.

On Thursday, published reports revealed that the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) sent Mrvan, who is white, a $5,000 check in late September. This was a major story, because Green, if elected, would become the first Black Republican woman in Congress.

Green hit this hard, charging that, “America’s poorest communities are proof Frank Mrvan and the CBC care more about power and helping themselves than helping the people of northwest Indiana.”

This new development comes days after the much-respected Cook Political Report listed the Mrvan-Green contest as a “Democratic Toss-Up.”

The last time an incumbent U.S. Representative was unseated in the 1st District was in 1984, when former congressional staffer Pete Visclosky defeated incumbent Rep. Katie Hall in the Democrat primary. Hall was black and Visclosky white.

The current district is 19% black.

Trump Republican Green also made recent news by raising more than $1.4 million to about $940,000 for incumbent Mrvan.

John Gizzi is chief political columnist and White House correspondent for Newsmax. For more of his reports, Go Here Now.

Original Article

Third-Party Candidates Could Impact Senate Races Outcomes

Third-Party Candidates Could Impact Senate Races Outcomes (Newsmax)

By Charlie McCarthy | Friday, 21 October 2022 02:41 PM EDT

Third-party candidates could affect the outcome in several U.S. Senate races, NBC News reported.

Candidates other than those from the Democratic Party or Republican Party could impact races in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, and Pennsylvania, NBC News said Friday.

The third-party effect is of heightened importance because Republicans are trying to wrestle control of the 50-50 Senate from Democrats.

The third-party candidates have little to no chance of winning their respective races, NBC said, but they have more than enough backing to influence results in what are considered to be tight races.

"I think it's going to be significant," Arizona Republican pollster Chuck Coughlin told NBC News of the third-party impact in key senate races.

"After all the ballots are counted, [candidates] are going to say, That guy had 5% of the vote or 4% of the vote, and if I add that 4%, I win, because that’s how close these races are going to be.

"When all the shouting and hollering is done, and all the ballots get counted, people are going to look around and go, God, we’ve got to keep that guy out of the race in the future. We've got to do something to stop that from happening."

In Georgia, Libertarian candidate Chase Oliver could force a Dec. 6 runoff between Democrat Sen. Raphael Warnock and Republican challenger Herschel Walker.

"I want the voters to know that they do have a third choice in this election," Oliver said in a debate Sunday that included Warnock but not Walker. "I don’t have any interest in partisan bickering. I owe no allegiance to either party. I only owe allegiance to you, the voter."

In Arizona, Libertarian candidate Marc Victor is running against Democrat Sen. Mark Kelly and Republican Blake Masters.

During a debate earlier this month, Victor blasted both of his opponents.

"One of them kisses [President Joe] Biden’s ring, one of them kisses [former President Donald] Trump’s ring. I don’t kiss anybody’s ring," said Victor, a combat veteran.

"Live your life however you choose. Just let other people do the same thing. My name is Marc J. Victor. And if you’re tired of the same old politics, I’m your guy."

In Pennsylvania, an Insider Advantage/Fox 29 Philadelphia poll showed Libertarian Erik Gerhardt at about 2% and "someone else" garnering about 1.5% support in a hotly contested race between Republican Mehmet Oz and Democrat Lt. Gov. John Fetterman.

In Nevada, Democrat Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, Republican Adam Laxalt, three third-party hopefuls, and a line for "none of these candidates" appear on the ballot.

NBC News reported that recent surveys have shown the combined share backing "someone else" and "none of these candidates" to be greater than the margin separating the two major-party candidates.

Pollsters said Libertarian candidates traditionally tend to win over more Republican-leaning voters than those who would back Democrats; other third-party candidates, such as Green Party nominees, have the inverse effect, NBC reported.

Original Article

Texas State Rep. Harrison to Newsmax: Deferring to CDC Dereliction of Duty

Texas State Rep. Harrison to Newsmax: Deferring to CDC Dereliction of Duty (Newsmax/"National Report")

By Theodore Bunker | Friday, 21 October 2022 02:27 PM EDT

Texas state Rep. Brian Harrison, a Republican, claimed on Newsmax on Friday that governors who defer to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on student healthcare issues are "derelict in their duty."

Harrison, who previously worked in the Department of Health and Human Services under former President Donald Trump, said on "National Report" that he opposes the CDC’s recent COVID-19 vaccination recommendation.

"I absolutely do not agree with this recommendation," he said. "I mean, this is an example of just the rank hypocrisy from the Democrat Joe Biden administration and quite frankly their allies in a lot of the major media outlets in America. It was exactly two years ago in October of 2020 when I was having to deal with CNN and all these other major media outlets saying that if we in the Trump administration bypassed the normal processes here and approved vaccines without mountains of robust data, something by the way we were gathering, that would be a quote worst-case scenario for public health."

Harrison said, "And now we have the Biden administration and Joe Biden CDC, the most political and anti-science CDC in history, making recommendations for every school child in America to get a COVID vaccine, and they did this without a shred of clinical data. They did this without any evidence of any efficacy in that population of children. There's never been a vaccine put on that childhood immunization schedule absent that type of data."

He went on to claim "that the bigger point here is that … no matter what the CDC said, you have no obligation whatsoever to follow these recommendations. And I'd go further and say not only do you not have an obligation to follow, any governor who blindly defers to the CDC on health-care mandates for their schoolchildren is derelict in their duty.

"I would say that every state legislature in America that blindly defers, or lets any state agency blindly defer to the unelected bureaucrats in the CDC to make healthcare decisions and force shots into children, a decision that should be made by parents and doctors, not by unelected bureaucrats. They would be derelict in their duty."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Sen. McConnell Breaks From House GOP, Pledges More Weapons to Ukraine

Sen. McConnell Breaks From House GOP, Pledges More Weapons to Ukraine (Newsmax)

By Jay Clemons | Friday, 21 October 2022 02:13 PM EDT

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., called on the Biden administration to expedite military aid to Ukraine Friday, while also pledging that Senate Republicans would guarantee "timely delivery" of more weapons for the Ukrainian troops, as their war with Russia spills into a ninth month.

In his Friday statement, McConnell applauded Congress for approving billions of dollars' worth of aid to Ukraine, and said a Republican majority in the Senate for 2023 "would focus its oversight on ensuring timely delivery of needed weapons and greater allied assistance to Ukraine."

McConnell's Ukraine vision among Senate Republicans might not match that of House Republicans.

Earlier in the day, Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., reportedly suggested a Republican-controlled House chamber — presuming the GOP claims the majority in the upcoming midterm elections on Nov. 8 — might impede aid to Ukraine, citing a refocused effort on prioritizing at-home issues, such as the uneven economy and the situation at the United States-Mexico border.

According to Politico, McConnell has often scoffed at Republicans being labeled "isolationists."

In a recent interview with Punchbowl News, McCarthy said the U.S. shouldn't be sending a "blank check" to Ukraine while major issues in America — such as the economy, inflation, immigration, and the fentanyl crisis — are receiving secondary attention.

This wouldn't be the first time McConnell has butted heads with other Republican leaders.

As Newsmax chronicled in August, former President Donald Trump demanded that GOP senators replace McConnell as leader "immediately," using the subjective rationale of McConnell believing he'd be in a stronger position of power — if Republicans failed to take over the Senate next month.

"[McConnell] was afraid to use the 'debt ceiling card' in order to stop the most expensive waste of money in our country's history, to be spent on the Green New Deal, which will only cause one thing, a Depression," said Trump, via the Truth Social app. "These expenditures are something our country can never recover from.

Trump added: "Mitch McConnell is not an opposition leader. He is a pawn for the Democrats to get whatever they want. He is afraid of them, and will not do what has to be done. A new Republican Leader in the Senate should be picked immediately!"

Last week, the Biden administration promised another $725 million in military/financial aid to Ukraine.

Also around that time, NATO leaders from the United States, Europe, and other regions pledged more weapons and air defense systems to the Ukrainian government.

According to ABC News estimates, the U.S. alone has committed more than $17.5 billion in military/financial aid to Ukraine, dating back to when Russia launched a full-scale invasion on Feb. 24.

Original Article

Jan. 6 Panel Issues Subpoena to Trump, Demanding He Testify

Jan. 6 Panel Issues Subpoena to Trump, Demanding He Testify Jan. 6 Panel Issues Subpoena to Trump, Demanding He Testify (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

FARNOUSH AMIRI and MARY CLARE JALONICK Friday, 21 October 2022 02:12 PM EDT

The Democrat-led House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol issued a subpoena Friday to former President Donald Trump, exercising its power against the man the committee claims is the “central cause” of a coordinated, multi-part effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

The nine-member panel issued a letter to Trump's lawyers, demanding his testimony under oath by Nov. 14 and outlining a request for a series of documents, including personal communications between the former president and members of Congress as well as extremist groups.

“We recognize that a subpoena to a former President is a significant and historic action," Chairman Bennie Thompson and Vice Chair Liz Cheney wrote in the letter to Trump. “We do not take this action lightly.”

It was not immediately unclear how Trump and his legal team will respond to the subpoena. He could comply or negotiate with the committee, announce he will defy the subpoena or ignore it altogether. He could also go to court and try to stop it.

The subpoena is the latest escalation in the House committee’s 15-month investigation of the deadly Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, bringing members of the panel into direct conflict with the man they have investigated from afar through the testimony of aides, allies, and associates.

The committee writes in its letter that it has assembled “overwhelming evidence” that Trump “personally orchestrated” an effort to overturn his own defeat in the 2020 election, including by spreading false allegations of widespread voter fraud, “attempting to corrupt” the Justice Department and by pressuring state officials, members of Congress, and his vice president to try to change the results.

But lawmakers say key details about what Trump was doing and saying during the siege remain unknown. According to the committee, the only person who can fill the gaps is Trump himself.

The panel — comprising seven Democrats and two Republicans — approved the subpoena for Trump in a surprise vote last week. Every member voted in support.

The day after, Trump posted a lengthy memo on Truth Social, his social media website, repeating his claims of widespread election fraud and expressing his “anger, disappointment and complaint” that the committee wasn’t investigating his claims. He made no mention of the subpoena.

Original Article

FAU Poll: DeSantis Up 11 Points Over Crist, 6 Points Over Biden

FAU Poll: DeSantis Up 11 Points Over Crist, 6 Points Over Biden (Newsmax)

By Brian Pfail | Friday, 21 October 2022 01:13 PM EDT

Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis is on track for re-election, leading Democrat challenger Charlie Crist by 11 percentage points in the latest Florida Atlantic University poll.

The poll comes off of solid approval ratings, particularly for DeSantis' response to Hurricane Ian. DeSantis leads Crist 51%-40% in the survey conducted of registered voters by the Florida Atlantic University Business and Economics Polling Initiative.

The Republican incumbent's approval rating was 53%, with his response to the hurricane garnering 63% approval. Nearly 67% of respondents expect DeSantis to be reelected, as well.

The survey of 719 Floridians revealed the most pressing of issues to be inflation, by a wide margin of 36%. Next was threats to democracy which received 19%. Only 9% felt abortion to be the most important of issues.

Senate races found Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., leading challenger Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., 48% to 42%, with 60% of respondents anticipating Rubio to be reelected.

"If these numbers hold, Florida's status as a battleground state might be in question," Kevin Wagner, Ph.D., a professor of political science at FAU and a research fellow, said.

Wagner noted younger voters leaned Democrat but would require a higher turnout to close the gaps in either race.

The poll also found respondents favored DeSantis and former President Donald Trump over President Joe Biden in a hypothetical 2024 matchup. DeSantis led 48% to 42% against Biden, and Trump led 45% to 41%.

Biden's approval rating was 41%, while 50% approve of the job he has done as president.

There were 34% who said the recent FBI raid of Trump's Mar-a-Lago makes them less likely to support the former president if he were to run again. A third of respondents said the search would make them more likely to support Trump.

The survey was conducted between Oct. 12-16. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.65 percentage points. The poll was weighted according to the demographics based on 2020 turnout modeling.

Original Article

FAU Poll: DeSantis Up 11 Points Over Crist, 6 Points Over Biden

FAU Poll: DeSantis Up 11 Points Over Crist, 6 Points Over Biden (Newsmax)

By Brian Pfail | Friday, 21 October 2022 01:13 PM EDT

Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis is on track for re-election, leading Democrat challenger Charlie Crist by 11 percentage points in the latest Florida Atlantic University poll.

The poll comes off of solid approval ratings, particularly for DeSantis' response to Hurricane Ian. DeSantis leads Crist 51-40% in the survey conducted of registered voters by the Florida Atlantic University Business and Economics Polling Initiative.

The Republican incumbent's approval rating was 53%, with his response to the hurricane garnering 63% approval. Nearly 67% of respondents expect DeSantis to be reelected, as well.

The survey of 719 Floridians revealed the most pressing of issues to be inflation, by a wide margin of 36%. Next were threats to democracy which received 19%. Only 9% felt abortion to be the most important of issues.

Senate races found Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., leading challenger Rep. Val Demings, D-Fla., 48% to 42%, with 60% of respondents anticipating Rubio to be reelected.

"If these numbers hold, Florida's status as a battleground state might be in question," Kevin Wagner, Ph.D., a professor of political science at FAU and a research fellow, said.

Wagner noted younger voters leaned Democrat but would require a higher turnout to close the gaps in either race.

The poll also found respondents favored DeSantis and former President Donald Trump over President Joe Biden in a hypothetical 2024 matchup. DeSantis led 48% to 42% against Biden, and Trump led 45% to 41%.

Biden's approval rating was 41%, while 50% approve of the job he has done as president.

There were 34% who said the recent FBI raid of Trump's Mar-a-Lago makes them less likely to support the former president if he were to run again. A third of respondents said the search would make them more likely to support Trump.

The survey was conducted between Oct. 12-16. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.65 percentage points. The poll was weighted according to the demographics based on 2020 turnout modeling.

Bannon Gets 4 Months Behind Bars for Defying Jan. 6 Subpoena

Bannon Gets 4 Months Behind Bars for Defying Jan. 6 Subpoena Bannon Gets 4 Months Behind Bars for Defying Jan. 6 Subpoena Former Trump White House senior advisor Steve Bannon speaks to the media as he arrives at federal court to be sentenced Friday. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

LINDSAY WHITEHURST Friday, 21 October 2022 11:12 AM EDT

Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, was sentenced Friday to serve four months behind bars after defying a subpoena from the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

The judge allowed Bannon to stay free pending appeal and also imposed a fine of $6,500 as part of the sentence. Bannon was convicted in July of two counts of contempt of Congress: one for refusing to sit for a deposition and the other for refusing to provide documents.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols handed down the sentence after saying the law was clear that contempt of Congress is subject to a mandatory minimum sentence of at least one month behind bars. Bannon’s lawyers had argued the judge could have sentenced him to probation instead. Prosecutors had asked for Bannon to be sent to jail for six months.

The House panel had sought Bannon’s testimony over his involvement in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Bannon has yet to testify or provide any documents to the committee, prosecutors wrote.

Prosecutors argued Bannon, 68, deserved the longer sentence because he had pursued a “bad faith strategy” and his public statements disparaging the committee itself made it clear he wanted to undermine their effort to get to the bottom of the attack and keep anything like it from happening again.

Original Article

Trump’s Boeing 757 Back in West Palm Beach After Repairs

Trump's Boeing 757 Back in West Palm Beach After Repairs Donald Trump's Boeing 757 Donald Trump's Boeing 757. (Getty Images)

By Nicole Wells | Friday, 21 October 2022 10:16 AM EDT

Donald Trump's plans to run for president again are seemingly still up in the air, where his Boeing 757 will presumably be sometime in the near future.

Trump's jet — dubbed "Trump Force One" — spent hours running pattern flights above a small airport in Lake Charles, Louisiana, this week, likely testing updated components, according to an analysis of flight data by CNN. Following the tests, the plane headed to the Palm Beach International Airport, where it arrived Wednesday night.

The former president had said previously that the plane would undergo repairs in Louisiana.

The 31-year-old jumbo jet had been idle for the four years of Trump's presidency and several months afterwards, and its arrival at the airport close to Mar-a-Lago, less than three weeks before the midterm elections, could indicate it may be getting ready to resume its past position as an oversized campaign component.

The plane made a series of short flight loops at varying altitudes twice in recent days, taking off and landing at Chennault International Airport in Louisiana, according to CNN. While some of the flights lasted less than 10 minutes and did not go above altitudes of 3,000 feet, others were longer, at 20 to 30 minutes, and reached altitudes of 9,000 to 23,000 feet, according to the flight data.

"It is common after a plane has had upgrades — or other new equipment or general avionic tweaks — for pilots to make a series of test flights to ensure safety and function," Peter Goelz, a former managing director of the National Transportation Safety Board, told CNN. "The series of passes at different altitudes, such as the ones completed in Louisiana, are indicative of standard checks."

A regular at Trump's campaign appearances and rallies during the run up to the 2016 election, the 757 was featured in a video Eric Trump posted to social media in July that showed the jet being painted at a hanger in Louisiana.

"SHE'S BACK!!" he wrote.

Original Article

Rabbi Menken to Newsmax: Trump’s Post on US Jews, Israel ‘Absolutely True’

Rabbi Menken to Newsmax: Trump's Post on US Jews, Israel 'Absolutely True' (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Friday, 21 October 2022 10:20 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump was criticized for questioning Jewish Americans on their support for Israel, but he comments were "absolutely true," Rabbi Yaakov Menken, the managing director for the Coalition for Jewish Values, told Newsmax on Friday.

"Everything he said there was completely reasonable and above board," Menken told Friday's "Wake Up America." "Israeli Jews back him. Evangelicals back him and sadly, U.S. Jews are turning against Israel to an increasing degree while Israel is in danger."

Earlier this week, Trump came under fire after he called for American Jews to "get their act together" and to show more appreciation for Israel before "it is too late."

"No president has done more for Israel than I have," Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding the United States' "wonderful Evangelicals are far more appreciative of this than the people of the Jewish faith, especially those living in the U.S."

One of Trump's critics this week was Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who said Trump's comments invoked tropes on Jewish loyalty at a time when antisemitism is on the rise worldwide, but Menken ridiculed using her as a source on the topic.

"Having Ilhan Omar on as an expert in antisemitism is appropriate in that she uses antisemitic tropes every day and twice on Shabbas," Menken said. "This is one of the leading antisemites in America. It is a terrible thing that she remains on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. As far as having her on television to discuss antisemitism, next week, they should have Son of Sam on to discuss violence against women."

Menken said he also agrees with Trump's comments stating he is the leading figure when it comes to Israel and that people there think he has done more for their country than any other U.S. president.

"The Israelis all think so," Menken said. "The observant Jewish community all think so. There was a clear preference for Donald Trump in the observant Jewish community in 2020. It was overwhelming. It was simply off the charts. That and certain pockets where it was clear that they had supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, they were clearly sold on Trump by 2020."

The support for Trump comes, according to Menken, "for his policies, not because of his personal behavior or anything like that, or his unreasonable statements that he, you know, like anybody, makes."

But Trump's policies "have always been extremely friendly," he added. "Not only does he not surround himself with antisemites, but he also surrounds himself with Jews who take their Judaism a lot more seriously than his critics."

On the other hand, entertainer Kanye West's antisemitic comments on Twitter, after he shared several controversial posts, including he was going to go "death con 3" on Jewish people, must not be tolerated, Menken said.

"It is a sad symptom on both sides of the aisle of a willingness to tolerate and accept antisemitism in a way that with any other minority group, he would be toast," Menken said. "You would have no career as of now, and he would not be getting defended by his friends like Candace Owens, whose comments about his statement were completely unreasonable."

Menken said Owens commented "a reasonable person can't look at that statement and conclude it was antisemitic. Imagine somebody saying they're going to go death con three on Black people. Would Candace Owens ever conclude that that wasn't racist? Of course not. It was obviously racist."

But still, he said there is a "sad tolerance" that is being seen for West's posts, and the fact he is an entertainer who can "make such a statement and not get widespread condemnation is indeed very scary."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Rabbi Menken to Newsmax: Trump’s Post on US Jews, Israel ‘Absolutely True’

Rabbi Menken to Newsmax: Trump's Post on US Jews, Israel 'Absolutely True' (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Friday, 21 October 2022 10:20 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump was criticized for questioning Jewish Americans on their support for Israel, but he comments were "absolutely true," Rabbi Yaakov Menken, the managing director for the Coalition for Jewish Values, told Newsmax on Friday.

"Everything he said there was completely reasonable and above board," Menken told Friday's "Wake Up America." "Israeli Jews back him. Evangelicals back him and sadly, U.S. Jews are turning against Israel to an increasing degree while Israel is in danger."

Earlier this week, Trump came under fire after he called for American Jews to "get their act together" and to show more appreciation for Israel before "it is too late."

"No president has done more for Israel than I have," Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding the United States' "wonderful Evangelicals are far more appreciative of this than the people of the Jewish faith, especially those living in the U.S."

One of Trump's critics this week was Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., who said Trump's comments invoked tropes on Jewish loyalty at a time when antisemitism is on the rise worldwide, but Menken ridiculed using her as a source on the topic.

"Having Ilhan Omar on as an expert in antisemitism is appropriate in that she uses antisemitic tropes every day and twice on Shabbas," Menken said. "This is one of the leading antisemites in America. It is a terrible thing that she remains on the House Foreign Affairs Committee. As far as having her on television to discuss antisemitism, next week, they should have Son of Sam on to discuss violence against women."

Menken said he also agrees with Trump's comments stating he is the leading figure when it comes to Israel and that people there think he has done more for their country than any other U.S. president.

"The Israelis all think so," Menken said. "The observant Jewish community all think so. There was a clear preference for Donald Trump in the observant Jewish community in 2020. It was overwhelming. It was simply off the charts. That and certain pockets where it was clear that they had supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, they were clearly sold on Trump by 2020."

The support for Trump comes, according to Menken, "for his policies, not because of his personal behavior or anything like that, or his unreasonable statements that he, you know, like anybody, makes."

But Trump's policies "have always been extremely friendly," he added. "Not only does he not surround himself with antisemites, but he also surrounds himself with Jews who take their Judaism a lot more seriously than his critics."

On the other hand, entertainer Kanye West's antisemitic comments on Twitter, after he shared several controversial posts, including he was going to go "death con 3" on Jewish people, must not be tolerated, Menken said.

"It is a sad symptom on both sides of the aisle of a willingness to tolerate and accept antisemitism in a way that with any other minority group, he would be toast," Menken said. "You would have no career as of now, and he would not be getting defended by his friends like Candace Owens, whose comments about his statement were completely unreasonable."

Menken said Owens commented "a reasonable person can't look at that statement and conclude it was antisemitic. Imagine somebody saying they're going to go death con three on Black people. Would Candace Owens ever conclude that that wasn't racist? Of course not. It was obviously racist."

But still, he said there is a "sad tolerance" that is being seen for West's posts, and the fact he is an entertainer who can "make such a statement and not get widespread condemnation is indeed very scary."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Jill Biden Says Hunter Biden Is ‘Innocent,” Wrongly Pursued

Jill Biden Says Hunter Biden Is 'Innocent," Wrongly Pursued (Newsmax)

By Eric Mack | Friday, 21 October 2022 09:31 AM EDT

First lady Jill Biden believes Hunter Biden is wrongfully pursued and is "innocent."

"Everybody and their brother has investigated Hunter," Jill Biden told NBC in an exclusive interview Wednesday from her East Wing office. "They keep at it, and at it, and at it. I know that Hunter is innocent. I love my son, and I will keep looking forward."

Jill Biden's comments mirror what former President Donald Trump repeated says about investigations going after him, which he calls an endless "witch hunt."

Allegations against Hunter Biden include unethical overseas business dealings with Ukraine, Russia, and China – all through now embroiled in turmoil during the Biden administration. Also, Hunter Biden is an admitted crack and sex addict. And reports allege he lied on a gun application, responding no when asked if he was a habitual drug user.

Jill Biden, 71, who conducted an interview with Newsmax this past week on efforts to address cancer in America, says her husband of 45 years "understands government better than anybody else," suggesting President Joe Biden will run again in 2024, despite Republican vows of oversight investigations into the Biden family.

A 2024 Biden reelection campaign "is something both Dr. Biden and the family fully support," a senior adviser told NBC News this week.

NBC News reports the first lady has a large influence on her husband, the White House, and even policy and administration moves.

"I don't think he makes any decision of consequence without speaking to her and having her view," longtime Biden confidant Ted Kaufman, a former senator from Biden's home state of Delaware, told NBC News.

For now, Jill Biden is on the campaign trail even more than her husband is.

"I'm trying to elect Democrats," she told NBC News. "We've got to keep the majority. We've got to do it."