James Comey hit with House GOP resolution condemning ’86 47′ post


FIRST ON FOX: House GOP allies of President Donald Trump are moving to use the power of Congress to punish former FBI Director James Comey for his now-deleted “86 47” Instagram post.

Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, chairman of the 189-member-strong Republican Study Committee (RSC), is introducing a resolution alongside Rep. Laurel Lee, R-Fla., to condemn Comey for “incitement of violence against President Donald J. Trump.”

Pfluger and Lee’s three-page resolution calls the post “disturbing” and “urges the relevant authorities to take every relevant action to ensure that Mr. Comey is never again permitted to serve as an employee of the federal government.”

ANTI-ABORTION PROVIDER MEASURE IN TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ COULD SPARK HOUSE GOP REBELLION

James Comey book tour

James Comey’s controversial Instagram post has been hammered by Republicans ((Photo by Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images))

It also asked the Department of Justice (DOJ) to not only investigate the matter, but also make the findings of its investigation known to both the relevant House committee and the American public.

Comey posted a photo of seashells forming the numbers “86 47” on the beach on Thursday.

It ignited a social media firestorm, with Trump allies and other Republicans immediately accusing the former FBI director of calling for Trump to be killed.

Comey later deleted the post and followed it with a statement that he opposed all violence.

“I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence,” Comey said. “It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem told the Associated Press that Comey is now under investigation by the Trump administration.

Donald Trump speaking

U.S. President Donald Trump fired Comey as FBI director during his first term. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

Pfluger and Lee’s resolution noted that Comey had made the post while Trump was on a diplomatic visit to the Middle East, which they argue ran the risk of “jeopardizing the President’s security and invigorating our nation’s enemies abroad.”

They also pointed out that there had been two known attempts on Trump’s life last year during the 2024 election – including the Butler, Pennsylvania, rally, where the president was shot in the ear.

Lee, notably, was on the House task force investigating the Butler rally shooting.

“Having failed in his attempts to take down President Trump as one of the main architects of the Russia collusion hoax, Comey has now resorted to the unthinkable: calling for violence against our Commander-in-Chief,” the RSC chairman told Fox News Digital.

MEET THE TRUMP-PICKED LAWMAKERS GIVING SPEAKER JOHNSON A FULL HOUSE GOP CONFERENCE

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“That someone who once held one of our nation’s most sacred positions of law enforcement would incite such dangerous rhetoric is not just alarming—it’s disqualifying and un-American. This resolution demands the accountability and transparency the American people deserve, ensuring Comey never again holds a position of public trust.”

Lee told Fox News Digital in a statement, “As a former federal prosecutor and judge, I take this seriously. When a former high-ranking law enforcement official invokes language associated with elimination—”86″—in a public post referencing President Trump, it raises legitimate concerns under federal statutes that prohibit threats against presidents and incitement to violence.

Fox News Digital made multiple attempts to reach Comey and his representatives but did not hear back by press time.



Source link

Biden’s autopen use questioned amid release of Robert Hur interview audio


GOP House Oversight Committee Chairman and other Republicans are raising concerns about former President Joe Biden’s cognitive functions were well enough to authorize aides to use an autopen tool to sign important documents on his behalf.

On Friday evening, Axios released exclusive audio footage of Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur, which reveals clues about Biden’s cognitive functioning while president that the interview’s transcript did not elucidate. Biden can be heard slurring his words, muttering and taking long pauses. Meanwhile, Biden also failed to recall the date of his son Beau’s death or the year Trump was first elected.  

“It questions who was actually making the decisions,” Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., said Friday night on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity.”

 “Clearly, from that interview, which was many, many months prior to the heavy use of the autopen, Joe Biden wasn’t capable of making decisions. He wasn’t coherent.”

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

James Comer, Joe Biden photo split

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer is opening an investigation into President Biden’s use of autopen. (Getty Images)

Earlier Friday, Comer announced a new investigation trying to uncover who gave the orders to use the autopen. According to Comer, among other important things, the autopen tool was used to grant presidential pardons to Biden’s family members.  

“It does call into question these pardons – the use of autopen, and I think it may actually open the door – I’m not a lawyer – but I’d imagine Trump or his administration may try to make some arguments to federal courts about actions Joe Biden took because now we’ve got more information coming out, and they’re reasonably going to determine, ‘Yeah Joe Biden couldn’t remember anything. He didn’t even know when his son died, or when Trump got elected or when he left office,” political commentator Tim Pool added.

‘TERRIFYING’: BIDEN-HUR AUDIO SHOWCASES FORMER PRESIDENT’S DECLINE

James Biden, Joe biden in split

James Biden (left) and President Joe Biden (right). (AP/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Who was controlling the autopen? Who was pulling the strings? Who were the unelected bureaucrats making decisions that negatively impacted our country?” asked former Robert F. Kennedy Jr. advisor Link Lauren. “I want names.”

Donald Trump has said he does not use autopen to sign legally binding documents like pardons. In March, a White House official confirmed it was the administration’s policy to use Trump’s hand signature on any legally binding documents.



Source link

Leaked Biden-Hur interview reveals memory lapses, sparks conservative outcry


Leaked audio from a 2023 interview between then-President Joe Biden and Special Counsel Robert Hur surfaced on Friday, revealing significant memory lapses and cognitive challenges. 

The audio recordings, obtained by Axios, depict Biden struggling to recall key dates, including the year his son Beau died and the year Donald Trump was elected president. 

The audio leaks have intensified criticisms over Biden’s mental fitness and prompted reactions from conservative commentators and political figures on social media site X.

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

Biden in front of flag

Audio leaks from the Biden-Hur interviews have intensified criticisms over Biden’s mental fitness. Biden had issues remembering his son’s death while struggling to answer other questions. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk called for further scrutiny toward Democrats, writing X, “Nobody can listen to it without concluding that every Democrat working with Biden HAS to have known he was completely feeble as a commander in chief.”

Fox News contributor Guy Benson called the audio “Painful.” 

“I couldn’t keep listening. The smears of Hur and the defenses of Biden look even worse,” Benson said. 

Fox & Friends co-host Lawrence Jones III called for accountability, writing on X, “We need a Biden commission. The entire cabinet and White House staff must be sworn under oath.”

Former NYPD inspector Paul Mauro commented on the administration’s reluctance to release the audio, saying, “This is painful…No wonder Biden’s DOJ wouldn’t release it.”

HUR TRANSCRIPT CONFIRMS BIDEN MEMORY LAPSES, CONTRADICTS PRESIDENT’S CLAIM ABOUT EXCHANGE OVER SON’S DEATH

Special Counsel Robert Hur testifies before Congress

Robert Hur investigated U.S. President Joe Biden’s mishandling of classified documents and published a final report with contentious conclusions about Biden’s memory. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Fox News contributor and radio host Hugh Hewitt highlighted the national security implications, stating, “Do not blame the president for aging quickly and poorly. But everyone involved in the cover-up put the country at risk because what we knew, all of our country’s enemies knew. They probably knew much of what we, the citizens, didn’t. The 25th failed.”

Jake Schneider with the White House Rapid Response team emphasized prior warnings about Biden’s fitness, writing on X, “We tried to tell you. We literally spent years trying to tell you. Please stop acting shocked that Biden was senile, incompetent, and unfit for office.”

Biden talking

Conservatives react to leaked Biden-Hur audio on social media. With some reactions saying “This is painful” or that “this is the biggest scandal in the US” ( Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Ambassador and Chief of Protocol to the U.S. Monica Crowley labeled the situation the “BIGGEST SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Brit Hume, Chief Political Analyst for the Fox News Channel reminded everyone, saying “As you read this thread, recall all the crap Biden partisans said about Robert Hur at the time.”



Source link

FLASHBACK: Biden shrugs of Hur report when pressed by Peter Doocy: ‘I know what the hell I’m doing’


Former President Joe Biden early last year dismissed Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report that sparked additional concern about his mental acuity, just months after he was interviewed about his mishandling of classified documents.

Axios on Friday released audio from Biden’s October 2023 interviews with Hur. In the recordings, Biden seemed to struggle to remember when his son Beau died, when he left office as vice president, what year President Donald Trump was elected to his first term, or why he had classified documents that should not have been in his possession.

The recordings not only showed Biden’s memory lapses, but also slurring his words and muttering when speaking to Hur. Transcripts of the interviews — conducted on Oct. 8 and 9 of 2023 — were released on March 12, 2024.

In February 2024, Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy was the first to question Biden about Hur’s report on his mental fitness.

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

Biden in front of flag

Then-President Joe Biden addresses the Classroom to Career Summit in the East Room of the White House on November 13, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

“Something the special counsel said in his report is that one of the reasons you were not charged is because, in his description, you are a ‘well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,'” Doocy said to Biden at a press conference on Feb. 8, 2024.

Biden responded: “I’m well-meaning and I’m an elderly man and I know what the hell I’m doing. I’ve been president and I put this country back on its feet. I don’t need his recommendation—”

Doocy then asked Biden how bad his memory was and if he could continue as president.

BIDEN REPEATEDLY SAYS ‘I DON’T REMEMBER’ REGARDING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS IN NEWLY RELEASED HUR INTERVIEW AUDIO

Former U.S. President Joe Biden

Then-President Joe Biden speaks to the National Action Network Convention remotely from the South Court Auditorium of the White House on April 12, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

“My memory is so bad I let you speak,” Biden told him.

Hur, who was appointed by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland to investigate Biden’s handling of classified documents, said he declined to bring charges against him, in part, because a jury would find him to be a “sympathetic, well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory,” despite the acknowledgment that the documents were “willfully” obtained by Biden during his time as vice president and as a senator.

The special counsel’s report, in addition to gaffes seen during Biden’s public appearances, amplified pressure from Republicans who said he lacked the mental fitness needed to serve as president.

President Biden

Then-President Joe Biden speaks during the United Auto Workers union conference at the Marriott Marquis on January 24, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Democrats and Biden’s White House initially criticized Hur for his report, repeatedly insisting he was “sharp” and that the special counsel was politically motivated.

Later in 2024, amid Biden’s re-election campaign, Democrats called on him to drop his candidacy over his performance in the June presidential debate against Trump, citing his age and mental acuity. Biden, now 82, ended his presidential campaign in July but finished his term, and his vice president, Kamala Harris, was defeated by Trump in November’s general election.



Source link

Leaked Biden audio reveals struggles to recall son’s death, Trump’s election


Leaked audio shared by Axios from President Joe Biden’s 2023 interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur has re-ignited serious questions about his mental sharpness, especially as he struggled to remember when his own son died and when Donald Trump was elected president.

In one moment, Biden tries to recall the death of his son, Beau: “My son. Is either been deployed or is dying. And so… What was happening though?”

“What’s much about dying? May 30, 2015, he died,” said Biden. “May 2015. I think it’s 2015. I’m not sure the months are, but I think that was it.”

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

President Joe Biden

Prominent liberals defended Biden’s “strong mental acuity” after Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report called out the leader’s “poor memory.” (Nicole Neri/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Beau Biden passed away from brain cancer on May 30, 2015, at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. He was 46.

In the audio, Biden also mixes up the year of Trump’s 2016 victory: “Trump gets elected in November of 2017. 2016. 2016. So… That’s when we left office, January of 2017. But that’s when Trump gets sworn in manually.”

The fumbling recollections are part of a six-hour interview that Hur used to support his conclusion that Biden’s memory was “significantly limited.”

The White House kept the audio under wraps at the time as critical moments in Biden’s own life and in recent American history appeared to be completely out of reach for the former president.

AXIOS REPORTER PUSHES BACK ON BIDEN’S DENIAL OF MENTAL DECLINE, SAYING WHITE HOUSE INSIDERS DISAGREE

Special Counsel Robert Hur testifies before Congress

WASHINGTON, DC – MARCH 12: Former special counsel Robert K. Hur testifies before the House Judiciary Committee on March 12, 2024 in Washington, DC. Hur investigated U.S. President Joe Biden’s mishandling of classified documents and published a final report with contentious conclusions about Biden’s memory. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The conversation, part of a two-day interview in October 2023, led Hur to describe Biden as a “well-meaning elderly man with a poor memory.”

On Fox News’ The Ingraham Angle Friday night, host Laura Ingraham put it bluntly: “This is the biggest scandal that I remember in recent political history: that this man was allowed to continue as the commander in chief of the world’s greatest superpower.”

President Joe Biden

President Joe Biden speaks during an event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, July 25, 2023. (Ting Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Panelist Francey Hakes added, “I’m not sure Joe Biden was capable of ordering dinner for himself, much less ordering airstrikes or anything else the commander in chief might have to do.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

As Ingraham said later in the segment, “We still don’t really know who was making the tough calls. It obviously wasn’t the man we heard on that tape.”



Source link

Biden admits keeping classified Afghanistan document for posterity in leaked audio


Former President Joe Biden, in newly leaked audio of his interview with special counsel Robert Hur, admitted he likely kept a classified document related to Afghanistan after he left the vice presidency for “posterity’s sake.” 

Biden first said he didn’t recall why he had the document when asked about it by Hur, who told him it was found in the library of his lake house. 

“I don’t know that I knew,” that he had the document, Biden answered, “but it wasn’t something I would have stopped to think about.” 

Hur noted that Bob Woodward and Jules Witcover both wrote about the document in their books about him, asking if he wanted to hang onto it because it might be the subject of reporting or “history.”

BIDEN STRUGGLES WITH WORDS, KEY MEMORIES IN LEAKED AUDIO FROM SPECIAL COUNSEL HUR INTERVIEW

“I guess I wanted to hang on to it for posterity’s sake. I mean, this was my position on Afghanistan. I’ve been of the view from a historical standpoint that there are certain points in history, world history, where fundamental things change using technology,” he said. 

“So, there are a lot of things that I think are fundamentally changing how international societies function, and they relate a lot to technology.” 

After the 80-year-old continued on that subject for a while, Hur interrupted him to get back to the topic of the document. 

“No, I’m sorry, that’s why I wanted it,” Biden answered. “It had nothing to with Afghanistan.” 

One of the former president’s lawyers then interrupted Hur to say, “For the purposes of a clean record,” he wanted to avoid “getting into speculative areas,” mentioning that Biden at first answered the question about the document by saying he didn’t recall why he had it. 

At that point, Hur answered, “I think we should take a break.” 

Biden in front of flag

Former President Joe Biden  (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

In other sections of the audio, Biden seems confused, asking what year his son, Beau Biden, died, and what year he left the vice presidency.

HOUSE JUDICIARY SUES GARLAND FOR BIDEN AUDIO THAT HUR SAYS SHOWS HIM AS ‘ELDERLY MAN WITH A POOR MEMORY’

The audio, related to an investigation into Biden’s handling of classified documents while vice president, came out after more than a year of congressional lawmakers demanding its release amid questions about the former president’s memory lapses and mental acuity. 

The House Judiciary Committee sued Attorney General Merrick Garland in July for the audio recordings, stressing the importance of the “verbal and nonverbal context” of Biden’s answers that could be provided by the audio recordings, especially considering Hur opted against charging Biden after the interview, partly because Biden was viewed as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

Robert Hur and Joe Biden

Hur opted against charging Biden after the interview, in part, because Biden was viewed as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” (Getty Images)

The committee argued at the time that the audio recordings, not merely the transcripts of them, are “the best available evidence of how President Biden presented himself during the interview.” 

That lawsuit was filed before Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race in July after he struggled in a June debate with Trump. 

Biden had exerted executive privilege over the audio recordings while president. 

Hur, who released his report to the public in February 2024 after months of investigation, did not recommend criminal charges against Biden for mishandling and retaining classified documents, and he said he would not bring charges against Biden even if he were not in the Oval Office. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Those records included classified documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan and other countries, among other records related to national security and foreign policy that Hur said implicated “sensitive intelligence sources and methods.”

Fox News Digital has reached out to Biden for comment. 



Source link

House Democrats under fire for storming Newark ICE facility


What’s dicier these days?

Flying into Newark Liberty Airport? Or finding yourself near the front gate of an ICE detention center in Newark?

To the mind of famous bandleader Raymond Scott – you’re in for “Bumpy Weather Over Newark” either way. That’s one of Scott’s most famous compositions. It ranks right up there with “Powerhouse” and the scores to 120 Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies cartoons.

A trio of House Democrats scuffled with federal law enforcement officers last week at Delaney Hall in Newark. It’s possible they could face discipline from the House for the fracas. Or worse.

REPUBLICANS STRUGGLE WITH TRUMP’S MIXED SIGNALS ON ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’

Reps. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., Robert Menendez Jr., D-N.J., and Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

Fox is told that arrests could be in the offing for Reps. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., Robert Menendez Jr., D-N.J., and Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J. (Getty Images)

Fox is told that arrests could be in the offing for Reps. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., Robert Menendez Jr., D-N.J., and Bonnie Watson Coleman, D-N.J.

“What happened on May 9th was not oversight. It was a political stunt that put the safety of our law enforcement officers, our agents, our staff, and our detainees at risk,” said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to a House hearing Wednesday. “The behavior was lawlessness. And it was beneath this body.”

Noem should know something about that. She served in the House for eight years. On her way into the hearing, Noem said that an investigation is underway.

“I think that arrests are still on the table for this,” said Homeland Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin on Fox. “If it was a typical U.S. citizen and they tried to storm into a detention facility that’s housing dangerous criminals or any person at all, they would be arrested. Just because you are a Member of Congress or just because you’re a public official does not mean you are above the law.”

Democrats argue they did nothing wrong. They had a right, under the law, to request an inspection of the facility. That comports with their oversight responsibilities. But House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., assessed videotape of Democrats tangling with federal agents. He determined that wasn’t oversight.

“It looked like a battery to me,” said Johnson.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., saw it differently.

U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries

U.S. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) speaks during his press conference at the U.S. Capitol on April 28, 2025, in Washington, DC.  (Kayla Bartkowski/Getty Images)

“There is zero basis to hold any Member of Congress accountable,” said Jeffries. “No videos have been produced suggesting that they’ve engaged in any inappropriate activity. And if those videos existed, certainly they would have been put into the public domain by now. Those videos haven’t been released because they don’t exist.”

Chatter about possible arrests or sanctions for the Democrats rattled around Capitol Hill all week. McIver and her aides bowled past a wall of reporters en route to the Noem hearing Wednesday.

“Are you worried about being arrested potentially?” asked yours truly.

McIver’s aides pushed arms and hands holding microphones out of the way.

“Excuse me! Excuse me!” ordered McIver, never breaking stride.

“The Speaker has talked about censure, Ms. McIver. Do you have any response to that?” I asked.

The Congresswoman disappeared behind a doorway to the House Homeland Security Committee, never responding.

TRUMP PUSHES TAX HIKES FOR WEALTHY AS ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ DEADLINE LOOMS

Colleague Dan Scully tried valiantly to get McIver to comment on Thursday. But no dice.

“(Interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey) Alina Habba said she was going to announce an investigation. Was there any sort of deal made between you and what happened over there? Do you care to comment on that at all?” asked Scully.

Silence from McIver.

“Has anyone from DOJ reached out to you?” asked another reporter.

Crickets.

“Congresswoman, do you regret shoving officers? Did you think you would get away with that?” asked another scribe.

Nada.

“Do you have any comment at all?” queried Scully.

It’s doubtful that even the resourcefulness of TV’s MacGyver could have pried loose any response from McIver.

Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., introduced a resolution to strip McIver, Menendez and Watson Coleman of their committee assignments.

“Keep your hands off of Members of Congress,” warned Jeffries.

Yours truly followed up with Jeffries at his press conference Tuesday.

“What happens if they were to go and arrest these Members, or if they would try to sanction them in the House first?” I asked.

“They’ll find out,” replied Jeffries.

“What would you do?” I followed up.

“They’ll find out,” repeated Jeffries.

“What resource?” I countered.

“They’ll find out,” he said again.

“Doesn’t that broach…?”

“They’ll find out.”

“Does that go against…?”

“That’s a red line,” said Jeffries.

“What’s the red line?” I asked.

TWO PLANES DO ‘GO-AROUNDS’ TO AVOID MILITARY HELICOPTER NEAR REAGAN WASHINGTON NATIONAL AIRPORT

“It’s a red line. It’s very clear. First of all, I think that the so-called Homeland Security spokesperson is a joke. It’s a joke. They know better than to go down that road. And it’s been made loudly and abundantly clear to the Trump Administration. We’re not going to be intimidated by their tactics,” said Jeffries. “There are clear lines that they just dare not cross.”

An arrest of these lawmakers would spark a firestorm on Capitol Hill. Article I, Section 6 of the Constitution generally shields lawmakers from charges – so long they as they are conducting official Congressional business. A lawmaker isn’t off the hook if they shoot someone. But the Founders were mindful of how politically-motivated arrests could undercut the work of Congress. So, they crafted what’s known as the “Speech or Debate” clause to inoculate lawmakers when conducting business.

“They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place,” reads the provision.

“I don’t think that’s Speech and Debate clause,” said Johnson about the rhubarb in Newark. “We have to set a standard here. You cannot have Members of Congress pushing law enforcement officials around and that’s exactly what everybody saw on the videotape.”

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wondered how a prosecution might short-circuit Congressional prerogatives and privileges.

“I think it’s a sign of weakness to instill fear,” said Pelosi. “It does definitely step on the Speech or Debate Clause.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wondered how a prosecution might short-circuit Congressional prerogatives and privileges. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

One Democrat involved in the Newark skirmish said prosecution wouldn’t surprise her.

“The rule of law means nothing to them,” said Watson Coleman. “I think the majority of this country will see that this is not American. This is not upholding the Constitution.”

House Republicans would like to censure the triumvirate of New Jersey Democrats who were at Delaney Hall. Censure is one of the official modes of discipline in the House, just short of expulsion. That requires a vote on the House floor. The House voted to censure Rep. Al Green, D-Tex., after he hectored President Trump during his speech to a Joint Session of Congress in March.

Like all things, it’s about the math. And Fox is told the House likely lacks the votes to discipline the Members or oust them from committees.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

As for criminal charges? Those remain to be seen. But actually arresting a Member of Congress would undoubtedly trigger some “Bumpy Weather Over Newark.”

And a political firestorm in Washington, DC.



Source link

Trump use of Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants temporarily halted by high court


The Supreme Court on Friday decided in favor of an appeal by a group of Venezuelan migrants who asked the high court to halt their deportation under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA). 

The decision, similar to others it has made in the past on the matter, revolved around the alleged illegal immigrants not having enough time to reasonably file a challenge to their deportations. Two justices, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, dissented.

President Donald Trump has been using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to try and speed up the deportation processes of illegal immigrants, but the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling presents another blow to those attempts after the court ruled against the Trump administration in their effort to remove men already in immigration custody in a northern region of Texas.

SUPREME COURT BLOCKS NEW DEPORTATIONS OF VENEZUELANS IN TEXAS UNDER 18TH CENTURY ALIEN ENEMIES ACT

El Salvador guards with inmates

Suspected gang members arrive in El Salvador by plane, including 238 members of Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang and 23 members of the MS-13 gang. (El Salvador Presidency / Handout/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“Under these circumstances, notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster. But it is not optimal for this Court, far removed from the circumstances on the ground, to determine in the first instance the precise process necessary to satisfy the Constitution in this case. We remand the case to the Fifth Circuit for that purpose,” the ruling from the court reads. 

The court did not rule on Friday on whether the AEA was lawful, but rather sent the matter back to the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

“To be clear, we decide today only that the detainees are entitled to more notice than was given on April 18,” the Supreme Court’s ruling said.

Last month, the Supreme Court lifted a lower court’s order barring the government from deporting migrants under the AEA. However, that decision also made clear that anyone the government wants to deport must be given proper notice. A few weeks after that decision, the Court halted deportations of illegal immigrants in Texas that the Trump administration was trying to proceed with under the AEA.

ALITO BLASTS ‘UNPRECEDENTED’ SCOTUS MOVE TO HALT TRUMP’S VENEZUELA DEPORTATIONS: ‘LEGALLY QUESTIONABLE’

Trump with document on desk, left; inmates, right

Decisions on six emergency appeals dealing with challenges to President Donald Trump’s executive actions are forthcoming, including several tied to the Trump administration’s efforts to deport illegal immigrants. (AP)

The Supreme Court’s Friday decision to once again halt deportations by the Trump administration comes a day after the High Court’s justices heard oral arguments in a case on birthright citizenship, which is also tied to whether federal judges can use their power to block the president’s executive actions nationwide. Several lower court federal judges have sought to stop the Trump administration from rapidly deporting illegal immigrants under the AEA.

Including the birthright citizenship case, there are five other pending emergency appeals dealing with challenges to Trump executive actions.

Those include cases related to temporary protected status (TPS) for Venezuelan migrants, immigrant parole programs, independent agency member firings, DOGE access to Social Security Administration data and federal workforce-reduction efforts — the last of which was filed on Friday afternoon.

Trump, left; Supreme Court building, right

A number of Trump administration initiatives are before the Supreme Court on emergency appeals. (Fox News)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform after news of the ruling.

The president followed up with a subsequent post on the platform, as well.

“The Supreme Court has just ruled that the worst murderers, drug dealers, gang members, and even those who are mentally insane, who came into our Country illegally, are not allowed to be forced out without going through a long, protracted, and expensive Legal Process, one that will take, possibly, many years for each person, and one that will allow these people to commit many crimes before they even see the inside of a Courthouse,” he wrote. 

“The result of this decision will let more CRIMINALS pour into our Country, doing great harm to our cherished American public. It will also encourage other criminals to illegally enter our Country, wreaking havoc and bedlam wherever they go. The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do. Sleepy Joe Biden allowed MILLIONS of Criminal Aliens to come into our Country without any ‘PROCESS’ but, in order to get them out of our Country, we have to go through a long and extended PROCESS. In any event, thank you to Justice Alito and Justice Thomas for attempting to protect our Country. This is a bad and dangerous day for America!”



Source link

Trump vs. ‘The Boss’: Fox News Politics Newsletter for May 16, 2025


Welcome to the Fox News Politics newsletter, with the latest updates on the Trump administration, Capitol Hill and more Fox News politics content.

Here’s what’s happening…

-Trump wraps momentous Middle East trip with economic deals, Syria sanctions relief and warning to Iran

-Handful of Republicans sink Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ in key House committee

-Trump appointee Barrett challenges admin on nationwide injunctions, surprises and delights liberals

Trump Hits Back at ‘Obnoxious Jerk’ Bruce Springsteen

President Donald Trump slammed Bruce Springsteen as being “highly overrated” on Friday after the rocker called his administration “corrupt, incompetent and treasonous.”

“I see that Highly Overrated Bruce Springsteen goes to a Foreign Country to speak badly about the President of the United States. Never liked him, never liked his music, or his Radical Left Politics and, importantly, he’s not a talented guy — Just a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden, a mentally incompetent FOOL, and our WORST EVER President, who came close to destroying our Country,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.

Springsteen tore into Trump on Wednesday during the first of a series of concerts in Manchester, England…READ MORE

Bruce Springsteen closeup on stage

Bruce Springsteen performs during the first night of his ‘The Land of Hopes and Dreams’ tour at Co-op Live on May 14 in Manchester, England. (Shirlaine Forrest/Getty Images)

White House

DEMOCRATS GRILLED: Democratic presidential hopefuls grapple with Biden’s legacy as 2028 race begins

‘IT’S TIME’: Trump wants to meet Putin ‘as soon as we can set it up’ to discuss Ukraine war

‘QAT’ A DEAL: Trump secures deals with 3 Middle Eastern nations in first major trip of second term

Trump with Saudi crown prince

U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman attend a signing ceremony at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (Getty Images)

World Stage

AFGHANS ALIENATED: Afghans for Trump group feels abandoned after administration revokes refugee protections

WORLD COURT SCANDAL: ICC prosecutor behind Netanyahu arrest warrants steps aside amid sexual misconduct probe

LIFE OR DEATH: Zelenskyy speaks with Trump, allies after Russia peace talks broker no ceasefire

‘POLITICALLY MOTIVATED’: Israel turns tables on UN official claiming ‘genocide’ in Gaza with basic questions

Israeli ambassador and UN official

Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon issues a scathing letter in response to U.N. Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency Relief Coordinator Tom Fletcher ‘s remarks before the Security Council. (Getty Images)

Capitol Hill

‘SERIOUS QUESTIONS’: House GOP targets another Dem official accused of blocking ICE amid Delaney Hall fallout

‘TAIL WAGGING THE DOG’: Nationwide injunction opponents lament judges ‘rewriting the Constitution every other Thursday’

Across America

CHARGES DISMISSED: Federal magistrate judge dismisses trespassing charges against 98 arrested in new military zone

soldiers at Mexican border seen from air

U.S. soldiers take measures at the Mexican border after the Department of Defense signed a new order declaring 110,000 acres of land on the Mexican border as a National Defense Area at the request of US President Donald Trump in New Mexico, United States on May 08, 2025. (Can Hasasu/Anadolu via Getty Images)

‘KING OF KINGS’: Kennedy Center expands family-focused religious programming, starts with free kick-off event

Get the latest updates on the Trump administration and Congress, exclusive interviews and more on FoxNews.com.



Source link

Former FBI Director Comey meets with Secret Service after ’86 47′ post


Former FBI Director James Comey is expected to meet face to face with U.S. Secret Service officials in Washington, D.C. for an interview about his “86 47” post, two sources briefed on the meeting told Fox News.

Comey is under investigation for an Instagram post showing seashells arranged on a beach to read “86 47.”

“Cool shell formation on my beach walk,” he wrote in the since-deleted post. Some have interpreted the post to mean “86” – get rid of –  “47” – Donald Trump, the 47th president.  

James Comey in 2017

Former FBI Director James Comey is expected to meet face to face with U.S. Secret Service officials in Washington, D.C. for an interview about his “86 47” post, two sources briefed on the meeting told Fox News. (Mark Reinstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The U.S. Secret Service is leading the investigation at this point, but the FBI and Department of Justice could take a larger role if necessary, Fox News is told.



Source link

Federal judge erupts at Trump administration in migrant deportation hearing


U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis excoriated Trump administration lawyers Friday in a remarkable status hearing centered on Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, the Salvadorian migrant and alleged MS-13 member who was deported from Maryland to El Salvador in March in what administration officials have acknowledged was an administrative error.

The heated back-and-forth was full of eye-popping exchanges between the judge and the Justice Department, as she took umbrage with their attempts to invoke the state secrets privilege to shield details concerning Abrego Garcia from the court. 

“What world are we living in,” Xinis asked in disbelief after more than two hours of proceedings. “What sort of legal world are we living in?”

She sparred multiple times with DOJ lawyers over their assertion that Abrego Garcia was lawfully detained and deported. 

JUSTICE KAGAN SNAPS AT TRUMP LAWYER IN MAJOR CASE: ‘EVERY COURT HAS RULED AGAINST YOU’

A crowd of demonstrators gathers outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, holding signs and chanting in support of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Visible signs read

Demonstrators gather outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Md., to protest the continued detention of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a migrant and alleged MS-13 member who was deported to El Salvador in March, in what Trump administration officials have acknowledged was an “administrative” error.  (Fox News Digital – Breanne Deppisch)

“He was lawfully detained? No he wasn’t!” Judge Xinis objected. “There was no order of removal, there was no warrant for removal – there was nothing.”

She cut off Justice Department attorney Jonathan Guynn again when he attempted to continue with a different argument. “You didn’t even respond to what I just said,” she told him. “A DHS attorney came in at the first hearing and confirmed that there was no lawful basis to arrest Abrego Garcia.”

“Why are we skipping over that – as part of the misconduct at issue, in light of the pattern I’m currently faced with on this day?” she asked, in disbelief.

For at least 30 seconds, the courtroom fell completely silent. 

The judge said she would issue an order later Friday outlining next steps, after the two sides huddled for a closed portion of the case. 

Xinis, who, despite her mounting frustrations, seemed likely to grant the government another deadline extension, described the hours-long hearing as beating a “frustrated and dead horse.” 

At one point, she rebuked the Justice Department for trying to invoke the state secrets privilege via a footnote referencing a filing in a separate case before a different court, noting that this would not pass muster in her courtroom.

Most of the public hearing was marked by similar sharp exchanges over whether the Trump administration had taken any steps to comply with court orders to facilitate Abrego Garcia’s return – a point Xinis reiterated was already settled by both her court and the Supreme Court last month.

At another contentious moment, she laughed in apparent disbelief at the lack of evidence and disclosures from the government. “I can’t count the number of ‘I don’t knows’ my wonderful clerks and I have heard,” she said of depositions from Trump administration officials.

FEDERAL JUDGE JAMES BOASBERG FINDS PROBABLE CAUSE TO HOLD TRUMP IN CONTEMPT OVER DEPORTATION FLIGHTS

A crowd of demonstrators holds protest signs outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, demanding the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Visible signs read

The government has so far declined to facilitate his return to the U.S., despite court orders and a Supreme Court ruling.  (Fox News Digital – Breanne Deppisch )

Xinis told the government lawyers they had not presented her with a sufficient affidavit to invoke the state secrets privilege – which the Trump administration has asserted is necessary in this case to protect sensitive diplomatic and foreign policy matters from being made public in court. 

Pointing to a prior admission from the Trump administration, Xinis also said Abrego Garcia was removed from the U.S. “without lawful authority.” 

“You’ve conceded it. There’s witness testimony,” she said. Any attempt to revise this “would be exceptionally difficult.”

 “Respectfully, your honor, he was removed lawfully,” Guynn replied.

“No,” an incredulous Xinis shot back. “He was removed unlawfully.”

“His removal from the U.S. was lawful,” the Justice Department attorney insisted. 

“Well no – no it wasn’t,” Xinis said, visibly stunned. 

TRUMP’S REMARKS COULD COME BACK TO BITE HIM IN ABREGO GARCIA DEPORTATION BATTLE

A woman speaks through a megaphone at a rally outside the U.S. District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland, where demonstrators hold signs supporting Kilmar Abrego Garcia and praising Judge Paula Xinis.

The judge in the case ordered both sides to court Friday, May 16, 2025 to hear from Trump officials seeking to invoke state secrets privileges. (Fox News Digital – Breanne Deppisch)

“Because there’s actually the [Immigration and Naturalization Act], which says that if the United States elects to remove someone to a third country, there’s a process. Congress has set out that process, the executive has to follow that process.,” she said. “So it is not determined yet whether removal to a third country would be appropriate, which is why the Supreme Court ruled the way it did.”

Ultimately, she said, the government will likely have extra time to file additional declarations to allow it to seek the state secrets privilege.

Still, she said she “has to point out” that the unlawful removal of Abrego Garcia from the U.S. “is a foregone conclusion.”

“He was removed in error. He was sent to El Salvador when there was a notice of withholding of removal, and so that was not lawful.” 

Plaintiffs noted that the government had labeled 1,140 documents related to Abrego Garcia’s case as privileged – but in contrast, they were sent just 164 documents – 132 of which were photocopies of their own court filings and interrogatories sent back to them.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Your Honor, a life is in the balance,” Abrego Garcia’s lawyers said, urging the court to move faster.

Xinis previously criticized the administration for failing to comply with her court’s requests for information in the case – accusing officials in a blistering eight-page order of submitting “vague, evasive and incomplete” responses that she said demonstrated “willful and bad faith refusal to comply with discovery obligations.”



Source link

Comey had earlier anti-Trump seashell photo prior to 2024 election


Ex-FBI Director James Comey had another anti-Trump seashell moment prior to his Thursday Instagram post that showed seashells arranged to show the numbers “86 47,” a message that White House officials swiftly condemned as an attempt to incite a “hit” against the 47th president.

Comey posted a photo of a single larger seashell that was painted blue with the words “Vote Harris” on it in October 2024. “Saw this at the beach,” the ex-FBI chief captioned the post. “Ariel understands the assignment,” he added, apparently a reference to the main character of Disney’s “The Little Mermaid.”

Comey’s propensity to post images of political messages on the beach has gotten him into some hot water after the Secret Service said it was sending agents to investigate and interview Comey.

THE ‘DANGER’ OF COMEY’S TRUMP POST CANNOT BE UNDERESTIMATED,’ TULSI GABBARD WARNS

beach scene with James Comey in upper right inset

The Secret Service is investigating after ex-FBI Director James Comey posted an Instagram photo of seashells arranged to show the numbers “86 47,” a message condemned by some as a coded message for ‘a hit’ on the president. (Getty Images/Fox News)

Shortly after posting the image, Comey took it down and subsequently put up a separate post acknowledging the matter. 

“I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message,” Comey said in his subsequent post. “I didn’t realize some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”

Biden and Trump, left and right; Comey in Biden T-shirt, center

Former FBI Director James Comey has been unafraid to show his political views since being dismissed in the first Trump administration. (Getty Images/AP/Fox News)

The FBI, where Comey used to work before he was fired by Trump during his first term, had no comment on the matter, but it was also apparent that people at the top levels of the agency were aware of the post. Trump’s new FBI director, Kash Patel, acknowledged on X that agency personnel were “aware” of Comey’s post, in his own statement shared on X.

TRUMP ADDRESSES COMEY’S ‘8647’ MESSAGE: ‘HE KNEW EXACTLY WHAT IT MEANT’

“We are in communication with the Secret Service and Director Curran,” Patel said. “Primary jurisdiction is with SS on these matters and we, the FBI, will provide all necessary support.”

Kash Patel at witness table in hearing

FBI Director Kash Patel, joined at right by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, answers questions as the Senate Intelligence Committee holds its worldwide threats hearing on Tuesday, March 25. (AP/J. Scott Applewhite)

Comey’s Thursday Instagram post was roundly criticized, including by the president, for working to stoke political violence.

“There is no doubt that James Comey hated Donald Trump,” Ted Cruz said. “There is also no doubt that the extreme rhetoric from the left contributes to an atmosphere of violence.”

“If a right-winger posted this against a leftist, all hell would break loose. But because it’s James Comey—the man who weaponized the FBI against President Trump—the left is silent,” Tennessee Republican Rep. Andy Ogles said. “That’s unacceptable. The Left invented the term ‘stochastic terrorism’ to go after conservatives anytime they voiced a strong opinion.”

The ex-FBI chief appears to have a propensity to post his political leanings on social media. An Instagram post, as recently as March 31, included an animated image stating, “TRANS PEOPLE BELONG,” while in February Comey posted “a message from my former colleagues” that could be considered to be aimed at Republicans and President Trump.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Know that these people – some evil, most just followers too weak to stand up – will fade, but the need for your work will remain,” the post said in part. “Don’t let the darkness of bad people steal the joy of public service,” it added. 



Source link

Judge slaps down Biden-era guidance on sex-based employment discrimination


A Trump-appointed federal judge slapped down portions of Biden-era Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidance that claims Title VII protections against sex-based employment discrimination include the concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity.

The ruling, signed by Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northwestern District of Texas, declares that language in the guidance that defines “sex” in Title VII as encompassing sexual orientation and gender identity is “contrary to law.” 

The ruling declares the same regarding “all language defining ‘sexual orientation’ and ‘gender identity’ as a protected class.”

“Sex-based discrimination under Title VII includes employment discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity,” part of the EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace reads. “Accordingly, sex-based harassment includes harassment based on sexual orientation or gender identity, including how that identity is expressed.”

US JUDGE RULES THAT BIDEN TEAM’S LGBTQ PROPOSAL WRONGLY INTERPRETED OBAMACARE PROVISION

Left: President Joe Biden at Donald Trump's inauguration; Right: American flags and pride flag on White House

Left: President Joe Biden at the presidential inauguration in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Monday, Jan. 20, 2025; Right: A Pride flag is displayed during a Pride celebration on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C., on June 10, 2023. (Left: Saul Loeb/AFP/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Right: Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images)

The guidance notes that, “The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law, are not meant to bind the public in any way, and do not obviate the need for the EEOC and its staff to consider the facts of each case and applicable legal principles when exercising their enforcement discretion.”

The ruling comes in a legal challenge lodged by the Heritage Foundation — a conservative D.C. think tank — and the state of Texas.

“The Biden EEOC tried to compel businesses – and the American people – to deny basic biological truth,” Dr. Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America, said in a statement, noting that “thanks to the great state of Texas and the work of my Heritage colleagues, a federal judge said: not so fast. 

READ THE JUDGE’S ORDER – APP USERS, CLICK HERE:

“This ruling is more than a legal victory. It’s a cultural one,” he added. “It says no – you don’t have to surrender common sense at the altar of leftist ideology. You don’t have to pretend men are women. And you don’t have to lie to keep your job. Heritage is doing exactly what the conservative movement needs to do: stop apologizing, start suing, and take back institutions.”

The White House called it a “major win for women and commonsense.”

The judge “confirmed what the Trump Administration consistently maintains: government-imposed DEI policies requiring bathroom, dress, and pronoun accommodations are illegal,” White House spokesman Harrison Fields told Fox News Digital.

On Inauguration Day earlier this year, President Donald Trump issued an executive order declaring it U.S. policy “to recognize two sexes, male and female.” 

That order called for rescinding guidance documents, or portions of documents, that clash with the order. The EEOC’s Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace was specifically mentioned in the order.

CLINTON-APPOINTED FEDERAL JUDGE BLOCKS TRUMP ADMIN FROM PULLING FOREIGN SERVICE WORKERS’ BARGAINING RIGHTS

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk

Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk declared that language in the guidance that defines “sex” in Title VII as encompassing sexual orientation and gender identity is “contrary to law.”  (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas)

However, after Trump issued the order, EEOC Commissioners Charlotte Burrows, Jocelyn Samuels and Kalpana Kotagal said in a joint statement that “like all workers, LGBTQI+ workers — including transgender workers — are protected by federal law and entitled to the full measure of America’s promise of equal opportunity in the workplace.” 

Samuels and Burrows later said in January they had been informed by the White House that Trump was removing them from their roles as EEOC commissioners.

The EEOC notes on its website that it needs a quorum to vote on rescinding guidance documents.

“As of January 28, 2025, the EEOC no longer has a quorum of its bipartisan leadership panel of Commissioners, following the departures of two Commissioners. The Commission panel currently is comprised of Republican Acting Chair Andrea Lucas (designated as Acting Chair by President Trump on January 20, 2025) and Democrat Commissioner Kalpana Kotagal,” the website explains.

NEW HOUSE BILL WOULD MAKE TRUMP BAN ON TRANSGENDER TROOPS PERMANENT

President Donald Trump signs an executive order

President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025. ( Bonnie Cash/UPI/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Texas attorney general’s office and the EEOC did not immediately respond to requests for comment from Fox News Digital on Friday.



Source link

Trump secures $2 trillion in Middle East deals with Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar


President Donald Trump returned to Washington from the first major trip of his second term with significant agreements in place. 

The deals struck in the Middle East mark historic moments for both the U.S. and its partners in the region. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Qatar have all committed to increasing their investments in the U.S., similar to deals Trump has pushed for with U.S. partners across the globe.

President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

President Donald Trump, left, meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman during a “coffee ceremony” at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

TRUMP PRAISES SAUDI ARABIA IN FIRST STOP ON MIDDLE EAST TRIP

1. Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Trump signed several agreements on energy, investments, defense, mining and more that totaled $600 billion. This included a commitment by Google, Uber, Salesforce, AMD and Saudi Arabia’s DataVolt to invest $80 billion toward the development of revolutionary technologies in both countries.

American companies will also take on major projects in Saudi Arabia, including the King Salman International Airport, King Salman Park, The Vault and Qiddiya City, according to the White House. The administration predicts the projects will generate a total of $2 billion in U.S. service exports. 

Additionally, several U.S. government departments will begin coordinating with Saudi government ministries, including the U.S. Department of Energy and the Ministry of Energy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, as well as NASA and the Saudi Space Agency. 

Trump was also able to secure an agreement that would allow the U.S. to carry cargo between Saudi Arabia and third-party countries without stopping in the U.S., which the White House said is “an important right for cargo hub operations.”

President Trump visits the United Arab Emirates

President Donald Trump attends a business forum at Qasr Al Watan during the final stop of his Gulf visit in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, on May 16, 2025. (REUTERS/Amr Alfiky)

TRUMP MAKES HISTORIC UAE VISIT AS FIRST US PRESIDENT IN NEARLY 30 YEARS

2. Qatar

Trump’s deals with Qatar were arguably the most controversial of his trip, after both Republicans and Democrats criticized a plan for Doha to provide a jumbo jet that is expected to be used as Air Force One. 

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., found themselves in a rare position — on the same side of an argument. However, they objected to the plan for different reasons. While Sanders questioned the constitutionality of the administration accepting the Qatari jet, Cruz cited “significant espionage and surveillance problems.” Additionally, Sens. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and John Kennedy, R-La., expressed their lack of trust in Doha.

“Qatar is not, in my opinion, a great ally. I mean, they support Hamas. So, what I’m worried about is the safety of the president,” Scott told reporters on Tuesday.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The deals Trump secured during his trip will see Doha and Washington participate in agreements worth $1.2 trillion, according to the White House. This is in addition to economic deals totaling $243.5 billion, which include the sale of American-made aircraft to Qatar Airways.

The White House also touted a defense deal that will “lock in Qatar’s procurement of state-of-the-art military equipment from two leading U.S. defense companies.” The two countries also agreed to a multibillion-dollar agreement to strengthen their security partnership.

U.S. President Donald Trump meets Qatar's Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, in Doha, Qatar.

President Donald Trump, left, meets Qatar’s Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani in Doha, Qatar, on May 14, 2025. (Reuters/Brian Snyder)

STATE DEPARTMENT APPROVES SALE OF $1.4B WORTH OF HELICOPTERS, F-16 PARTS TO UAE AHEAD OF TRUMP’S VISIT

3. United Arab Emirates 

Trump left the UAE with $200 billion in commercial deals, including a $14.5 billion commitment from Etihad Airways to invest in 28 American-manufactured aircraft. Additionally, Emirates Global Aluminum is set to invest $4 billion in an aluminum smelter project in Oklahoma, which will be one of the first new smelters built in the U.S. in 45 years, according to the White House.

The UAE and the U.S. also reached energy agreements in which the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company will partner with ExxonMobil, Occidental Petroleum and EOG Resources to expand oil and natural gas production. The White House said in a statement that the deal is expected to “help lower energy costs and create hundreds of skilled jobs in both countries.”

The deals made during Trump’s trip to Abu Dhabi are set to expedite a commitment the UAE made in March to a 10-year, $1.4 trillion investment framework in the U.S., which covered a range of industries, including energy and AI.



Source link

Afghans for Trump leader urges reversal of decision to end refugee protections


A group that once campaigned to put Donald Trump in the White House now says they feel abandoned by his administration’s decision to revoke legal protections for thousands of Afghan refugees living in the U.S. under Temporary Protected Status (TPS).

Zoubair Sangi, the leader of the “Afghans for Trump” movement, formed after the chaotic 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, said his community turned to Trump after the Biden administration’s exit left their homeland in turmoil. 

Now, he is urging the president to reconsider.

“The reality is that Afghanistan is not safe,” Sangi told Fox News. “Over the last three years, since the return of the Taliban, the country has been as dangerous as ever.”

He said the Department of Homeland Security’s claim of an “improved security situation” fails to reflect the reality on the ground.

TRUMP PUSHES TO RECOVER ‘BILLIONS OF DOLLARS’ OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT LEFT BEHIND IN AFGHANISTAN WITHDRAWAL

A senior Taliban official inspects a line of uniformed soldiers standing at attention during a military parade in Afghanistan. The official walks on a red carpet flanked by armed guards, with ceremonial troops holding rifles in formation. A large blue flag and other national or organizational banners are visible in the background.

Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the Taliban-appointed deputy prime minister for economic affairs, center, inspects the honor guards during a military parade to mark the third anniversary of the withdrawal of U.S.-led troops from Afghanistan, in Bagram Air Base in the Parwan Province of Afghanistan, on Wednesday, Aug. 14, 2024. (AP Photo/Siddiqullah Alizai)

“The Taliban, at the end of the day, are a terrorist group,” he said. “They target anyone who disagrees with them – anyone who worked with the U.S. government or allied forces. Their lives are in grave danger.”

Sangi added that women face especially grim conditions in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan, where they are banned from education and public life without a male escort.

“They view women as subservient. They treat them worse than cattle,” he said. “There is no freedom for ordinary Afghans. It’s a prison. People are essentially under house arrest, and they can’t escape.”

Despite his frustration, Sangi said he has not withdrawn his support for Trump – but he is pleading with him to rethink the decision. “We do have hope that any kind of mistake that is made specifically in regards to Afghanistan will be corrected.”

He praised Trump for refusing to recognize the Taliban and ending foreign aid to Afghanistan that fell into their hands, and he urged him not to strike any deals.

“The Taliban mock America, reject your demands for the return of our $7 billion in military equipment, and harbor terrorists who threaten our homeland,” said Sangi. “Engaging with them isn’t America First.”

AFGHANS FOR TRUMP GROUP LOOKING TO MAKE FOREIGN POLICY — AND 2021 WITHDRAWAL — FRONT AND CENTER IN ELECTION

Taliban celebrate US withdrawal of Afghanistan

Members and supporters of the Taliban stand on a U.S. flag as they hold a rally to mark the third anniversary of the fall of Kabul, in Kabul, Afghanistan, on Aug. 14, 2024. (REUTERS/Sayed Hassib)

On Monday, the Department of Homeland Security officially ended TPS for Afghan nationals, potentially forcing more than 9,000 individuals to return to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem cited an “improved security situation” and a stabilizing economy as justification.

“This administration is returning TPS to its original, temporary intent,” Noem said. “We’ve reviewed the conditions in Afghanistan with our interagency partners, and they do not meet the requirements for a TPS designation.”

Afghans’ protected status is set to expire on May 20, with the program formally ending on July 12. Noem added that terminating the designation aligns with the administration’s broader goal of rooting out fraud and national security threats in the immigration system.

TPS allows foreign nationals from countries facing armed conflict, natural disasters or other emergencies to live and work legally in the U.S. Then-President Joe Biden had originally designated Afghanistan for TPS following the Taliban’s takeover in 2021.

While many Afghans who assisted the U.S. military during the two-decade war arrived under the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program, others – including former Afghan government workers and those tied to U.S. missions – entered under TPS amid the post-withdrawal chaos. These individuals now face potential deportation. 

British armed forces work with the U.S. military to evacuate eligible civilians and their families out of the country on August 21, 2021 in Kabul, Afghanistan.

Western forces work to evacuate people as Kabul falls to the Taliban in 2021. (MoD Crown Copyright via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Former Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Mike McCaul argued against the assertion that the security situation had improved, and urged the administration against moving to revoke the immigration status of Afghans here on SIVs or P1 and P2 visas.

The Taliban, he said, “have made their thirst for retribution against those who help the United States clear. Until they demonstrate substantial behavorial changes, I urge the administration to continue prioritizing the safety of the Afghan men and women who risked their lives to help our troops.” 

Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House and DHS with requests for comment. 



Source link

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ suffers massive blow in key hurdle before House vote


President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” failed to pass the House Budget Committee on Friday, in what appears to be a massive blow to House GOP leaders’ plans to hold a House-wide vote next week.

Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., and Ralph Norman, R-S.C., and Lloyd Smucker, R-Pa., all voted against the legislation.

The committee met on Friday to mark up and debate the bill, a massive piece of legislation that’s a product of 11 different House committees’ individual efforts to craft policy under their jurisdictions. The result is a wide-ranging bill that advances Trump’s priorities on the border, immigration, taxes, energy, defense and raising the debt limit. 

Emotions ran high in the hallway outside the House Budget Committee’s meeting room from the outset, however, giving the media little indication of how events would transpire.

A split of Mike Johnson and Donald Trump.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, left, and President Donald Trump. (Getty Images)

Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, who had been at home with his wife and newborn baby, surprised reporters when he arrived at the Cannon House Office Building after he was initially expected to miss the committee meeting.

His appearance gave House GOP leaders some added wiggle room, allowing the committee to lose two Republican votes and still pass the bill, rather than just one.

Shortly before the meeting was expected to begin, Roy, Norman, Clyde and Brecheen abruptly left the room while saying little to reporters on the way out.

Each came back a short while later and criticized the legislation in their opening remarks.

At one point, Norman came out of the room and called for the committee to recess in order to work through the fiscal hawks’ concerns.

“If they call for a vote now, it’s not going to end well,” he said, adding he was still waiting on commitments from House GOP leaders.

Minutes later, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., who is not a member of the committee but had been meeting with holdouts, told reporters he wanted the legislation to advance through the Budget panel “as soon as possible.”

When asked about Norman’s comments, he said, “I just walked out of the meeting with him a few minutes ago as well, we’re working on some questions that Ralph and others have, and we’re going to be getting them answers as soon as we get them back from the Trump administration. His questions were the same as Chips and a few others, and they’re very specific questions, valid questions we’re working on getting those answers right now.”



Source link

Biden’s 2024 mental acuity first gauntlet for potential 2028 Democrats


It was the first question thrown at potential 2028 Democratic presidential contender Pete Buttigieg as he briefly met with reporters following a town hall with veterans and military families in Iowa this week:

“Did President Joe Biden experience cognitive decline while in office?” Buttigieg was asked.

“Every time I needed something from him from the West Wing, I got it,” answered Buttigieg, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate who served four years as Secretary of Transportation in the Biden administration.

After a second reporter followed up, asking: “Would the party have been better off if he had just not run for re-election?” Buttigieg answered: “Maybe. Right now, with the benefit of hindsight, I think most people would agree that that’s the case.”

NEW BOOK PLACES BLAME ON BIDEN FOR HARRIS 2024 LOSS TO TRUMP

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg headlines a veterans' town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa on May 13, 2025. Buttigieg's appearance sparked speculation he may make another presidential run in 2028.

Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg headlines a veterans’ town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa on May 13, 2025. Buttigieg’s appearance sparked speculation he may make another presidential run in 2028. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)

Welcome to the 2028 White House race pre-season, where Democrats mulling a presidential run are starting to take the earliest of steps.

And as they do, they’re facing an initial gauntlet – questions about former President Joe Biden’s mental acuity during his final years in office and whether Democrats should have been more strident earlier in the 2024 election cycle in calling on Biden to abandon his bid for a second term in the White House.

“I think that is one of the top things that they do want to know about,” longtime New Hampshire-based radio host Chris Ryan told Fox News, as he pointed to his listeners on his popular morning news/talk program.

“The Democratic voters are still trying to sort through what happened and why,” said Ryan, who has interviewed scores of White House hopefuls over the years.

BIDEN AIDES ‘SCRIPTED’ EVERYTHING, ALLOWED HIS FACULTIES TO ‘ATROPHY,’ NEW BOOK CLAIMS

How the presidential hopefuls answer these questions will be an early test of their truthfulness in the eyes of voters who had serious concerns over whether Biden was mentally and physically up for another four years handling the world’s most grueling job.

But Ryan noted that “it’s different for each potential candidate based on their level of proximity to President Biden.”

The grilling of potential 2028 contenders and other Democrats comes as Biden’s condition is once again making headlines, courtesy of excerpts from a new book, “Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again,” which offers claims of a White House cover-up of the then-president’s alleged cognitive decline.

Biden dropped out of the White House race last July, one month after a disastrous debate performance with now-President Donald Trump that sparked a chorus of calls from fellow Democrats for the then-81-year-old president to end his re-election bid. 

President Biden at debate

President Joe Biden dropped his re-election bid less than a month after a disastrous debate performance against former President Donald Trump in Atlanta on June 27, 2024. (Kevin D. Liles for The Washington Post via Getty Images) (Kyle Mazza/Anadolu via Getty Images)

He was replaced at the top of the ticket by then-Vice President Kamala Harris, who ended up losing November’s presidential election to Trump. Democrats also suffered down ballot, losing control of the Senate and failing to win back the House majority from the Republicans.

During an appearance on ABC’s “The View” last week, Biden pushed back against accusations that he had suffered significant cognitive decline during the final year of his presidency.

Rep. Ro Khanna of California was a leading supporter and surrogate on the campaign trail for Biden during the 2024 election cycle. After last June’s debate, as a trickle of Democrats urging Biden to step aside turned into a steady stream, Khanna likened the embattled president to Rocky Balboa—the underdog boxer of big-screen legend.

TARGETED BY TRUMP, THIS WELL KNOWN DEMOCRAT SPARKS 2028 SPECULATION

“To rebuild trust, Democrats must be honest. In light of the facts that have come out, Joe Biden should not have run for reelection, and we should have had an open primary,” Khanna wrote in a social media post.

Khanna, in a statement, said, “I have always admired Biden’s resilience and the grit he has shown after the loss of his son — and often compared that strength to Rocky. I was a surrogate for the president of my own party whose policies I backed.”

“But obviously we did not have the full picture, and in hindsight it is painfully obvious that President Biden should have made the patriotic decision not to run,” Khanna said.

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California is interviewed by Fox News Digital at Yale University, on April 15, 2025, in New Haven, Conn.

Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California is interviewed by Fox News Digital at Yale University, on April 15, 2025, in New Haven, Conn. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)

Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut, another Democratic lawmaker who vouched for Biden last year, said that “there’s no doubt about it” when asked by Politico whether Biden had experienced cognitive decline. “The debate is whether it was enough that it compromised his ability to act as chief executive.”

Murphy, who is viewed as a potential 2028 contender, said that Biden staying in the 2024 race as long as he did was detrimental to the Democrats.

“I mean, isn’t that self-evident? We lost,” he said. “Obviously, in retrospect, we should have done something different.”

LESS THAN FOUR MONTHS INTO TRUMP’S SECOND TERM, DEMOCRATS ALREADY EYEING 2028 PRESIDENTIAL RACE

But Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, another possible White House candidate who was a top 2024 surrogate for Biden, said in a CNN interview this week when asked about Biden’s cognitive abilities: “As a governor in a state halfway across the country who was working her tail off, 160 stops on a bus tour that I had lined through swing states, I was busy working. I was busy doing the voter connection and registration, and so can’t speak to that directly.” 

“I didn’t see the president frequently.”

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer stands for a Fox News Digital interview, on July 25, 2024, in Durham, New Hampshire.

Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer stands for a Fox News Digital interview, on July 25, 2024, in Durham, New Hampshire. (Fox News – Paul Steinhauser)

But she added that “it does make me question a lot of the things I thought I knew over the course of the last year and a half.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

While the potential contenders are answering questions concerning Biden in different ways, there is one consensus.

“We’re not in a position to wallow in hindsight. We’ve got to get ready for some fundamental tests of the future of this country and this party,” Buttigieg noted. 



Source link

How Trump’s ‘common sense’ agenda incorporates traditional Democratic policies


Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

President Donald Trump is in the midst of promoting what he says are commonsense policies that will usher in the “golden age” for America, with his platform bolstered by a handful of traditional Democratic platforms, Fox News Digital found. 

“In everything we do, we’re putting America first, because the Republican Party is now known as the party of common sense. It’s the party of common sense. Very important. I think it’s a very important phrase for you to use.  It’s all about common sense. We’re conservative, and, you know, we’re a lot of things, but most important thing is we have to use common sense,” Trump said in February while addressing a conference of the nation’s Republican governors. 

As liberals and media talking heads bashed Trump on the campaign trail as a “threat to democracy” and compared him to Adolf Hitler, roughly four months into his administration, Trump has rolled out policies or made favorable remarks toward issues that Democrats have long rallied around during campaign events or in the chambers of Congress. 

Trump held a press conference flanked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other health officials on Monday morning to sign an executive order to lower drug prices by up to 80%. The executive order specifically “directs the U.S. Trade Representative and Secretary of Commerce to take action to ensure foreign countries are not engaged in practices that purposefully and unfairly undercut market prices and drive price hikes in the United States.”

TRUMP’S ‘WRONG-HEADED’ EFFORT TO LOWER DRUG COSTS AMOUNTS TO PRICE CONTROL: EXPERT

Trump at microphone speaking to crowd

President Donald Trump has embraced some traditional Democratic agenda items under his second administration. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

“The principle is simple – whatever the lowest price paid for a drug in other developed countries, that is the price that Americans will pay,” Trump said at the White House during the executive order signing ceremony. “Some prescription drug and pharmaceutical prices will be reduced almost immediately by 50 to 80 to 90%.” 

“Starting today, the United States will no longer subsidize the healthcare of foreign countries, which is what we were doing. We’re subsidizing others’ healthcare, the countries where they paid a small fraction of what for the same drug that what we pay many, many times more for and will no longer tolerate profiteering and price-gouging from Big Pharma,” he added. 

RFK Jr closeup

Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. was a longtime Democrat before endorsing President Donald Trump and joining his Cabinet. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr)

Fox News Digital reported earlier this week that Trump’s executive order effectively amounts to price controls on pharmaceuticals.

“We see price caps after natural disasters,” he argued. “We call them anti-gouging laws, and they produce shortages. And so that’s what we can expect price controls to produce when it comes to pharmaceuticals as well — that’s if you have a binding price ceiling, you’re going to get a shortage, and I think it’s totally a wrong-headed thing.” 

Lowering prescription drug prices through control measures and government intervention has been a cornerstone of Democratic platforms, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders vowing during his 2020 presidential campaign to lower such prices by 50% if elected and then-Vice President Kamala Harris issuing a tie-breaking vote in the Senate in 2022 to pass the Inflation Reduction Act, which empowered the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to negotiate prices for certain pharmaceuticals covered by Medicare. 

‘NEW GOLDEN AGE’: REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS ECSTATIC AS TRUMP TAKES OFFICE WITH SLATE OF NEW ORDERS

Trump celebrated during the executive order signing that he was taking on “price gouging” from “Big pharma,” which he argued is an industry that had been protected by Democrats until his administration. 

Trump, RFK Jr shake hands on stage

President Donald Trump’s administration has incorporated some policy objectives of those traditionally on the left, like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., right. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin)

Kennedy, the son of Democratic Attorney General Robert Kennedy and nephew to former Democratic President John F. Kennedy, celebrated that the Trump administration came through on the promise of lowering drug prices after decades of Democrats vowing they would enact such a plan. 

“This is an extraordinary day,” he said from the White House. “… I grew up in the Democratic Party and every major Democratic leader for 20 years has been making this promise to the American people. This was the fulcrum of Bernie Sanders’ runs for the presidency, that he was going to eliminate this discrepancy between Europe and the United States. As it turns out, none of them were doing it. And it’s one of these promises that politicians make to their constituents, knowing that they’ll never have to do it. And the reason they’ll never do it is because they know that Congress is controlled in so many ways by the pharmaceutical industry.”

Sanders issued a statement following Trump’s executive order, declaring, “I agree with President Trump” regarding how Americans pay “the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs,” before warning that the executive order would likely be thrown out by the courts and that Trump should support his upcoming legislation to tackle drug prices. 

When asked about Trump promoting policies typically touted by Democrats, the White House celebrated how Trump has transformed the GOP “to again become the party of the working class.”

“President Trump oversaw a historic transformation of the GOP to again become the party of the working class. While Democrats spent decades talking about helping everyday Americans, President Trump is actually delivering – revealing Democrats’ incompetence and corruption in the process,” White House spokesman Kush Desai said. 

SPEAKER MIKE JOHNSON: EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD ROOT FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SUCCESS

House Republicans released a portion of Trump’s tax agenda late on Friday evening, as Trump continues rallying lawmakers to pass his “big, beautiful bill” that will fund his agenda. Included in the proposal is an expansion of the child tax credit – which has long been featured on Democrats’ policy platforms.

While on the campaign trail, the Trump team said the president would consider a “significant expansion of the child tax credit that applies to American families,” FOX Business reported in August. 

While then-Ohio Sen. JD Vance said during the campaign that he would “love to see a child tax credit that’s $5,000 per child,” he added, “but you, of course, have to work with Congress to see how possible and viable that is.”

A portion of the legislation released by the House Ways & Means Committee last week would increase the current maximum child tax credit from $2,000 to $2,500.

Top Democrats from Harris to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries have promoted massive expansions of the child tax credit, including Harris campaigning on a proposal to provide a $6,000 tax credit for parents of newborns.

SEN BERNIE SANDERS: MY PLAN FOR THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY. WHAT I WILL–AND WON’T–DO

House chamber packed for presidential speech

Lawmakers are currently working to pass President Donald Trump’s “big, beautiful bill.” (Tom Williams)

“That is a vital, vital year of critical development of a child,” Harris said during her presidential campaign. “And the cost can really add up, especially for young parents who need to buy diapers and clothes and a car seat and so much else.”

Trump also broke with the traditional Republican ideology of not increasing taxes, saying he would “love” to tax wealthier Americans as part of a “redistribution” effort. 

“People would love to do it. Rich people. I would love to do it, frankly. Giving us something up top in order to make people in the middle income and the lower income brackets [have] more. So, it’s really a redistribution,” Trump said last week. 

Trump added on Truth Social last Friday that such a tax increase on the wealthy would spark outrage from Democrats and likely comparisons to former President George H.W. Bush increasing taxes during his administration. Trump, however, added that he is open to the move if that is what Republican lawmakers approve. 

“The problem with even a ‘TINY’ tax increase for the RICH, which I and all others would graciously accept in order to help the lower and middle income workers, is that the Radical Left Democrat Lunatics would go around screaming, ‘Read my lips,’ the fabled Quote by George Bush the Elder that is said to have cost him the Election. NO, Ross Perot cost him the Election!” Trump wrote.

“In any event, Republicans should probably not do it, but I’m OK if they do!!!” he added. 

Swaths of the Democratic Party have touted raising taxes on the wealthy out of an effort to reduce income inequality, including Sanders, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Slogans of “tax the rich” and calls for the wealthy to “pay their fair share” were also a hallmark of the 2020 federal and down-ballot elections, including for former President Joe Biden‘s 2020 presidential campaign. 

Biden at lectern

Then-President Joe Biden often campaigned on making “the super-wealthy” to “pay their fair share.” (AP/Susan Walsh)

“Corporations need to pay their fair share in taxes,” Biden posted on social media in November 2019. “I’ll reverse Trump’s giveaway to the super-wealthy and corporations because it’s time we reward work, not just wealth.”

“As president, I’ll make sure giant corporations and the super-wealthy pay their fair share in taxes — and then invest that money in growing a stronger, more inclusive middle class,” he wrote weeks later in December 2019.

TRUMP, HARRIS BOTH SUPPORT A CHILD TAX CREDIT. HERE’S HOW THEIR PLANS DIFFER

Trump, himself, was a registered Democrat for periods of his life, including during the early 2000s, before he switched back to the Republican Party in 2009, New York City election board data show. 

He has also found support from a handful of former Democrats, such as Kennedy and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, with Kennedy registering as an Independent last year during his own presidential campaign and Gabbard registering as a Republican and endorsing Trump during the campaign cycle. Gabbard herself briefly ran for president as a Democrat in the 2020 cycle before dropping out to endorse Biden.

While longtime Democrat voter and tech billionaire Elon Musk also broke with the party and endorsed Trump over the summer before becoming a fixture at rallies and ultimately serving as the public leader of the Department of Government Efficiency as a special government employee. 

Tulsi Gabbard hand raised

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was an elected Democratic lawmaker who briefly ran in the 2020 Democratic primary cycle for president. She later switched to the Republican Party. (Getty Images)

“We actually got a lot of great Democratic support, we just got RFK [Jr.], of course, Tulsi Gabbard, who endorsed the president in just the last couple of days,” Vance said while on the campaign trail in August. 

Trump has touted that the Republican Party has become the “common sense” party and that his policies are “all about common sense.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“In everything we do, we’re putting America first, because the Republican Party is now known as the party of common sense.  It’s the party of common sense. Very important. I think it’s a very important phrase for you to use.  It’s all about common sense. We’re conservative, and, you know, we’re a lot of things, but most important thing is we have to use common sense,” Trump said in February while addressing a conference of the nation’s Republican governors. 

Fox News Digital’s Elizabeth Elkind, Megan Henney, Diana Stancy and Chad Pergram contributed to this report. 



Source link

Nashville mayor hit with House GOP investigation letter after ICE raid criticism


FIRST ON FOX: Another Democrat is being brought under scrutiny over their handling of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations.

Tennessee Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., wrote a letter this week urging two top House committees to investigate Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell, who the Trump administration accused of supporting “pro-illegal policies.”

Ogles said O’Connell’s “recent actions raise serious questions about whether a municipal official is now obstructing federal law enforcement and possibly even actively aiding and abetting illegal aliens.”

Ogle’s district includes part of Nashville.

ANTI-ABORTION PROVIDER MEASURE IN TRUMP’S ‘BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL’ COULD SPARK HOUSE GOP REBELLION

nashville-mayor-ice

Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell criticized ICE raids in Nashville, Tennessee, saying they are not focused on making the city safer, but instead leave the community fearing law enforcement. (Associated Press / Getty Images)

It comes amid continued fallout from three House Democrats accused of “storming” an ICE facility in Newark, New Jersey. Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was also among those who ran through the gates of the detention center following a bus full of detainees, was arrested.

ICE agents working with the Tennessee Highway Patrol arrested nearly 200 people who the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said were illegal immigrants – many of them criminals with gang affiliations or other sordid pasts.

The DHS news release targeted O’Connell by name over comments he made in early May. “What’s clear today is that people who do not share our values of safety and community have the authority to cause deep community harm.”

ICE TOUTS RECORD-BREAKING IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT DURING TRUMP’S FIRST 100 DAYS

Andy Ogles

Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., is asking top House committees to investigate Nashville Mayor Freddie O’Connell. (Getty Images )

After the arrests, O’Connell signed an executive order aimed at tracking peoples’ interactions with federal immigration authorities, according to WSMV4.

He said of ICE’s work in his city, “It’s important for us to get this right, and it’s very frustrating to see a failure in the process.”

“Rather than commend law enforcement for removing dangerous individuals from the streets, the mayor chose instead to signal that federal agents are to be surveilled and distrusted—not supported,” Ogles wrote in his letter.

“This executive order is not a transparency initiative. It is already being operationalized as a political weapon.”

The Trump administration has had several showdowns with Democratic city and state officials over the White House’s crackdown on illegal immigrants.

His letter ended with a former request to House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Green, R-Tenn., to open a probe into O’Connell and other Nashville officials accused of blocking ICE.

Jordan is already holding a hearing next week on threats to ICE operations. The incident in Newark earlier this month is expected to be featured heavily during the event.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Our immigration system depends on cooperation and trust across all levels of government,” Ogles wrote. “When elected officials weaponize their offices to score political points by undermining federal law enforcement, they compromise public safety and the rule of law.”

Fox News Digital reached out to the Nashville mayor’s office as well as spokespeople for Jordan and Green for comment.



Source link

Trump secures nearly $2 trillion in Middle East deals during regional tour


President Donald Trump on Friday wrapped up a momentous week in the Middle East and is headed home having finished the final leg of his three-nation trip to the UAE.

While the trip, which first included stops in Saudi Arabia and then Qatar, was expected to be largely economically focused with massive investment deals secured with Riyadh, Doha and Abu Dhabi, the president also made geopolitical shockwaves by lifting decades-long sanctions on Syria, issuing another warning to Iran, and downplaying hard fought peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, which Moscow confirmed at the last moment would not be attended by Russian President Valdimir Putin.

Here’s a look at what happened this week:

President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman

President Donald Trump meets with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

TRUMP SIGNS ‘STRATEGIC ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP’ WITH SAUDI ARABIA

TRADE

Ahead of his trip to the Gulf, the president said he intended to return home with at least $1 trillion in trade and investment deals – though he far outstripped this apparent goal.

While in Saudi Arabia, Trump signed a $600 billion “strategic economic partnership” agreement with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, which will see Riyadh invest in U.S. AI data centers and energy infrastructure, investment in “cutting-edge transformative technologies in both countries” and a whopping $142 billion defense package – which the White House claimed is the “largest defense sales agreement in history.”

The president suggested the deal could near $1 trillion in the months to come and generate up to 2 million U.S. jobs. 

Trump also secured a big deal in Qatar with a $1.2 trillion “economic exchange” with Doha that included a purchase of 210 Boeing jets by state-owned Qatar Airways for $96 billion, as well as energy infrastructure agreements and an investment in state-of-the-art quantum technologies and workforce development.”

The deal in Qatar was overshadowed by the controversial announcement that Qatar wanted to “gift” Trump a new Air Force One jet.

The president also expanded on a $1.4 trillion deal brokered with the UAE in March and announced an additional $200 billion “in commercial deals” between Washington and Abu Dhabi.

Trump and Saudi prince

President Donald Trump walks with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman during a welcoming ceremony in Riyadh, May 13, 2025. (Bandar Algaloud/Courtesy of Saudi Royal Court/Handout via Reuters)

TRUMP OFFERS IRAN CHOICE: DROP NUCLEAR WEAPONS OR FACE ‘MAXIMUM PRESSURE’

IRAN

Trump addressed one major geopolitical issue not only plaguing Washington’s politics but the Middle East as a whole – Iran and its pursuit of a nuclear weapon. 

While nations like Saudi Arabia have long stood in opposition to Iran and its support of state-sponsored terrorism, the UAE and Qatar have increasingly looked to normalize relations with Tehran in an effort to stabilize the region.

But Trump used his visit to hone in on Washington’s determination to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon.

“If Iran’s leadership rejects the olive branch and continues to attack their neighbors, then we will have no choice but to inflict massive maximum pressure,” Trump said during an address in Saudi Arabia. “The choice is theirs to make.”

Trump harshly criticized Iran’s leadership and Iranian representatives did not respond to Fox News Digital’s questions over whether the president’s rhetoric could negatively impact the negotiations

“If only the Iranian regime had focused on building their nation up instead of tearing the region down,” Trump said. “Yet I’m here today not merely to condemn the past chaos of Iran’s leaders, but to offer them a new path and a much better path toward a far better and more hopeful future.

“In the case of Iran, I have never believed in having permanent enemies,” he added. 

President Donald Trump visits Qatar

President Donald Trump holds up a pen given by Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani as they exchange documents during a signing ceremony in Doha, Qatar, Wednesday, May 14, 2025. (Alex Brandon/AP)

TRUMP ASKS SYRIA TO JOIN ABRAHAM ACCORDS, NORMALIZE TIES WITH ISRAEL IN RETURN FOR SANCTIONS RELIEF

SYRIA

Trump took the international community by surprise, including some in his administration, according to reports, when he announced the U.S. would reverse a decades-old policy of sanctions on Syria

The U.S. first implemented sanctions on Damascus in 1979 when it designated it a State Sponsor of Terrorism. 

But following the fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime and the takeover by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham – which is a U.S. and U.N.-designated terrorist organization – Trump argued on Wednesday the country should be given a chance to recover.

“We are currently exploring normalizing relations with Syria’s new government,” Trump said.

U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in this handout released on May 14, 2025. Saudi Press Agency/Handout via REUTERS   THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY

U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, in this handout released on May 14, 2025. Saudi Press Agency/Handout via REUTERS   THIS IMAGE HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY

Trump met with Syria’s leader, President Ahmed Al-Sharaa, in Saudi Arabia and confirmed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio would also meet with the Syrian foreign minister in Turkey this week. 

 “I am also ordering the cessation of sanctions against Syria to give them a fresh start. It gives them a chance for greatness, as the sanctions were really crippling,” he added.

“It’s not going to be easy,” Trump said in reference to rebuilding Syria and addressing the ongoing fighting that still persists in the country. “It gives them a good, strong chance. And it was my honor to do so.”

TRUMP TO SKIP RUSSIA-UKRAINE PEACE TALKS, CALLS ZELENSKYY THE ‘GREATEST SALESMAN, MAYBE IN HISTORY’

President Donald Trump visits Qatar

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters aboard Air Force One en route from Saudi Arabia to Qatar, Wednesday, May 14, 2025. (Alex Brandon/AP)

RUSSIA-UKRAINE

Trump raised eyebrows earlier this week when he made the surprise announcement that he was considering traveling to Turkey from the UAE to participate in the Ukraine-Russia peace talks. 

But Russia refused to say whether Putin would in fact be traveling to Ankara, where Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had intended to visit to start hashing out a solution to end Russia’s three-year-long invasion.

On Thursday, the Kremlin confirmed Putin would not participate in peace negotiations, which renewed questions over his seriousness in ending the war. 

However, Trump downplayed Putin’s refusal to participate in the talks and suggested it was due to a schedule miscommunication. 

“Look, nothing’s going to happen until Putin and I get together. OK?” Trump said apparently annoyed over the question as to whether he was disappointed Putin would not participate in the talks. “He was going to go, but he thought I was going to go. He wasn’t going if I wasn’t there. 

“I don’t believe anything’s going to happen, whether you like it or not, until he and I get together” he added, suggesting the Thursday talks in Ankara are not expected to accomplish much. “But we’re going to have to get it solved because too many people are dying.”

President Donald Trump visits Qatar

President Donald Trump and Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani gesture during a state dinner at Lusail Palace in Doha, Qatar, Wednesday, May 14, 2025. (Alex Brandon/AP)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

GAZA

Despite Qatar being a leading player in negotiations for an end to Israel’s deadly military operations in the Gaza Strip and the return of all 58 hostages still held there, the president did not directly comment on current efforts to end the war. 

Instead, he doubled down on his previous suggestion that the U.S. should own the Palestinian territory, despite Middle Eastern nations, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE, repeatedly calling for a two-state solution as defined by U.N. borders. 

Trump said he has seen “aerial shots where, I mean, there’s practically no building standing. It’s not like you’re trying to save something. There’s no buildings. People are living under the rubble of buildings that collapsed, which is not acceptable.”

“I want to see that be a freedom zone. And if it’s necessary, I think I’d be proud to have the United States have it, take it, make it a freedom zone. Let some good things happen,” he added in reference to his idea that also calls for the removal of more than 2 million Palestinians

Palestinians and Arab nations have rejected this idea and have largely backed an Egyptian proposal for the reconstruction of Gaza Strip. EU nations and the U.N. have also backed the $53 billion proposal. 



Source link