Dick Morris to Newsmax: ‘Tragic’ for Steve Bannon to Get Jail Time

Dick Morris to Newsmax: 'Tragic' for Steve Bannon to Get Jail Time

(Newsmax/"Saturday Report")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Saturday, 22 October 2022 01:52 PM EDT

It was "tragic" for Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, to be sentenced to four months behind bars for defying the Jan. 6 committee's subpoena, political strategist Dick Morris said on Newsmax Saturday.

"Steve is one of my heroes," Morris, the author of the best-selling "The Return: Trump's Big 2024 Comeback" told Newsmax's "Saturday Report." "He is one of the most brilliant people I've ever met."

Note: Get Dick Morris' new book "The Return" on Trump's secret plan for 2024. See It Here!

Bannon was behind Trump's winning election strategy in 2016 to focus on voters in the nation's so-called "flyover country," or "what Hillary [Clinton] called the 'deplorables,' the high school graduates, working-class voters, who don't live on the coasts," said Morris.

"Trump discovered these people and said their needs have not been made public, and that 'nobody's focusing on them, but I am,'" Morris continued.

And while those voters were being mocked as "deplorables, clinging to their guns and Bibles," Trump said he'd pay attention to them and put them first, said Morris.

"That strategy came right out of the fertile brain of Steve Bannon," he said. "I once told him he and I belonged to a very exclusive club of about five people who are still alive who ran the successful campaigns of people for president. I've got such respect and admiration for him. It's tragic that he's going to have to go to jail."

The judge sentencing Bannon allowed him to stay free, pending his appeal, and imposed a $6,500 fine against him.

In July, Bannon was convicted of two contempt of Congress charges, one for refusing to sit for a deposition and the other for refusing to provide documents.

Morris on Saturday said the sentencing, along with Trump's subpoena to testify before the committee, is what he calls "WMDs," or "weapons of mass distraction."

"This is designed to distract everyone from inflation, crime, immigration, [President Joe] Biden's failures," said Morris. "Abortion is fading, so this gives them something to talk about. Jan. 6 gives them some talking points that they can use."

Morris said he had a similar experience back when he was working for President Bill Clinton in 1996.

"When he was approaching Election Day, Ken Starr was investigating him over Monica Lewinsky and subpoenaed me to come before the grand jury; and the subpoena was returnable two weeks before Election Day," Morris recalled, noting that it was an effort to distract voters' attention away from the president and focus it on Lewinsky while Clinton was running for reelection."

But, Morris said, his attorney was able to delay his testimony; and he thinks Trump's deposition will be delayed as well.

Further, he said that the Jan. 6 committee "will go out of existence on Dec. 31 because the Republicans will take control of at least the House and probably the Senate."

"Once the Republicans take control, this committee is done. Goodbye," said Morris. "They won't exist anymore."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax: We Learned More ‘About the Russia Hoax’

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax: We Learned More 'About the Russia Hoax'

(Newsmax/"America Right Now")

By Eric Mack | Saturday, 22 October 2022 12:33 PM EDT

Special counsel John Durham's case against Igor Danchenko for allegedly lying to the FBI in an attempt to smear Donald Trump before the 2016 presidential election was "weak" and predictably failed, but it did shed public light on the "Russia hoax," according to legal expert Alan Dershowitz on Newsmax.

"The case was not a very strong one," Dershowitz told "America Right Now." "The alleged statements made were ambiguous. So this was always a weak case. I was surprised that Durham brought it."

But the case did reveal the FBI offered up to $1 million for election campaign dirt on Trump, an assault on Justice Department ethics if not an assault on democracy, according to some legal experts.

"I think we learned some things: We learned about the Russia hoax a little bit more," Dershowitz told host Tom Basile, using Trump's own mocking term "Russia hoax" to describe the actions of the FBI and political operatives seeking to frame Trump for colluding with Russians.

But Dershowitz noted, a Washington, D.C., jury was never going to convict someone for lying to the FBI to get Trump.

"I predicted right from the outset that he would not win this case against Igor Danchenko, because juries don't like crimes that are based on simply not telling the truth to the FBI," Dershowitz said.

"People understand that when you raise your hand, you have to tell the truth; but when you're gossiping to the FBI and they're lying to you and they're exaggerating, it's natural for people to sometimes make statements that in retrospect seem untruthful."

Dershowitz has long warned Newsmax that the FBI is licensed to lie, making a lot of its law enforcement practices questionable in nature.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax: We Learned More ‘About the Russia Hoax’

Alan Dershowitz to Newsmax: We Learned More 'About the Russia Hoax' (Newsmax/"America Right Now")

By Eric Mack | Saturday, 22 October 2022 12:22 PM EDT

Special counsel John Durham's case against Igor Danchenko for lying to the FBI in an attempt to smear Donald Trump before the 2016 presidential election was "weak" and predictably failed, but it did shed public light on the "Russia hoax," according to legal expert Alan Dershowitz on Newsmax.

"The case was not a very strong one," Dershowitz told "America Right Now." "The alleged statements made were ambiguous. So this was always a weak case. I was surprised that Durham brought it."

But the case did reveal the FBI offered up to $1 million for election campaign dirt on Trump, an assault on Justice Department ethics if not an assault on democracy, according to some legal experts.

"I think we learned some things: We learned about the Russia hoax a little bit more," Dershowitz told host Tom Basile, using Trump's own mocking term "Russia hoax" to describe the actions of the FBI and political operatives seeking to frame Trump for colluding with Russians.

But Dershowitz noted, a Washington, D.C., jury was never going to convict someone for lying to the FBI to get Trump.

"I predicted right from the outset, that he would not win this case against Igor Danchenko, because juries don't like crimes that are based on simply not telling the truth to the FBI," Dershowitz said.

"People understand that when you raise your hand, you have to tell the truth, but when you're gossiping to the FBI and they're lying to you and they're exaggerating, it's natural for people to sometimes make statements that in retrospect seem untruthful."

Dershowitz has long warned Newsmax that the FBI is licensed to lie, making a lot of its law enforcement practices questionable in nature.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Pollster John Zogby to Newsmax: Races Remain Too ‘Volatile’ to Call

Pollster John Zogby to Newsmax: Races Remain Too 'Volatile' to Call dr. mehmet oz waves leaving the stage during a save america rally Dr. Mehmet Oz (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Saturday, 22 October 2022 11:12 AM EDT

Momentum is shifting toward Republicans campaigning for the upcoming midterm elections as it shifted toward Democrats after the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, but most races remain too close to call, pollster John Zogby told Newsmax on Saturday.

"I think we have one or maybe two more lifetimes to go between Nov. 8," Zogby, the founder of the Zogby International Polls and a senior partner at John Zogby Strategies, told Saturday's "Wake Up America." "It's volatile. These are very close races."

Even when numbers are shown to be shifting, radical changes are not seen, he added.

"We're all going between one and two points and three points to a deficit," Zogby said.

And some races, he said, are turning out to be a surprise as a result, he added, pointing out Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, "wasn't on anybody's radar screen as having any potential trouble, but now, according to The Des Moines Register poll, that's a 3-point race with momentum toward the Democrats.

"It's way too soon to call any winners here," according to Zogby.

Meanwhile, Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign adviser, was also on the program and noted, across the county there will likely be a tightening of support for a number of individuals.

"The Senate is being discussed quite a bit, but watch the governors' races," he said, adding there are several key races in places like Ohio, where GOP Gov. Mike DeWine is facing a strong challenge from former Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley, a Democrat who hopes to become the state's first female governor.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Pollster John Zogby to Newsmax: Races Remain Too ‘Volatile’ to Call

Pollster John Zogby to Newsmax: Races Remain Too 'Volatile' to Call dr. mehmet oz waves leaving the stage during a save america rally Dr. Mehmet Oz (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Saturday, 22 October 2022 11:12 AM EDT

Momentum is shifting toward Republicans campaigning for the upcoming midterm elections as it shifted toward Democrats after the Supreme Court's decision overturning Roe v. Wade, but most races remain too close to call, pollster John Zogby told Newsmax on Saturday.

"I think we have one or maybe two more lifetimes to go between Nov. 8," Zogby, the founder of the Zogby International Polls and a senior partner at John Zogby Strategies, told Saturday's "Wake Up America." "It's volatile. These are very close races."

Even when numbers are shown to be shifting, radical changes are not seen, he added.

"We're all going between one and two points and three points to a deficit," Zogby said.

And some races, he said, are turning out to be a surprise as a result, he added, pointing out Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, "wasn't on anybody's radar screen as having any potential trouble, but now, according to The Des Moines Register poll, that's a 3-point race with momentum toward the Democrats.

"It's way too soon to call any winners here," according to Zogby.

Meanwhile, Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign adviser, was also on the program and noted, across the county there will likely be a tightening of support for a number of individuals.

"The Senate is being discussed quite a bit, but watch the governors' races," he said, adding there are several key races in places like Ohio, where GOP Gov. Mike DeWine is facing a strong challenge from former Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley, a Democrat who hopes to become the state's first female governor.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Sen. Cruz Blasts Biden’s ‘Gall’ Comparing Student Loans With Pandemic PPP Money

Sen. Cruz Blasts Biden's 'Gall' Comparing Student Loans With Pandemic PPP Money

(Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Charles Kim | Saturday, 22 October 2022 10:56 AM EDT

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, blasted President Joe Biden for his comments touting student loan forgiveness, when he compared the debt relief to the COVID-19 Paycheck Protection Program.

"Unbelievable gall," Cruz posted on Twitter Friday. "Dems kept America shut down and disintegrated small businesses and jobs of working Americans…now he's comparing PPP loans that people got to deal with those government mandates to loan forgiveness he gave to his Ivy League slacker fringe liberal base to buy their votes."

According to The Washington Post, Biden’s student debt relief would forgive up to $10,000 in federal student loans for borrowers making up to $125,000 per year individually, or families with a combined income of $250,000.

Those with Pell Grants could receive another $10,000 off their loans, according to The Post.

A federal appeals court, however, stayed the program Friday night while it considers an injunction filed by six Republican states, according to the report.

"We are pleased the temporary stay has been granted," Republican Nebraska Attorney General Doug Peterson, one of the states' officials who sued the administration, said in a statement to The Post. "It's very important that the legal issues involving presidential power be analyzed by the court before transferring over $400 billion in debt to American taxpayers."

Speaking at Delaware State University Friday, Biden lashed out at GOP critics of the plan, naming two who received funds during the pandemic.

"I don't want to hear it from MAGA Republicans who had hundreds of thousands of dollars of debts, even millions of dollars, in pandemic relief loans forgiven," Biden said Friday. "[Rep.] Marjorie Taylor Greene, she and her husband got over $180,000 in business loans."

The $800 billion PPP program was signed into law by former President Donald Trump at the height of the pandemic in April 2020 and extended by Biden in March 2021, MarketWatch reported in January.

The program was designed to keep businesses afloat and workers employed as the nation shut down battling the pandemic, saving an estimated 3 million "job years."

The news outlet estimated that between 23% to 34% of the funding went to the workers at about 93% of the nation's small businesses.

While workers did see some benefit from the program, the balance of 66% to 77% of the money flowed to the business owners and shareholders, including creditors and suppliers, a study published in January by the National Bureau of Econimic Research found.

According to the study, around 75% of the money went to the "top quintile" of households and compared "unfavorably" to other pandemic relief measures like enhanced unemployment benefits and stimulus checks.

Original Article

Biden Breaks His Annual Record With 2.3M Illegal Border Crossings

Biden Breaks His Annual Record With 2.3M Illegal Border Crossings (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Eric Mack | Saturday, 22 October 2022 09:48 AM EDT

President Joe Biden predictably released his record-breaking illegal migrant border crossing data Friday night, mitigating news coverage, but the Republican National Committee pounced Saturday morning.

More than 2.3 million illegal immigrants have crossed the border year, breaking the record Biden's administration set a year ago with a 37% increase. The total of the two record-setting years of illegal migration under the Biden administration is now 4.7 million.

That figure includes 3.8 million illegals apprehended by Customs and Border Protection and more than 900,000 know gotaways that have escaped Border Patrol. That suggests the number of illegal migrants coming to the U.S. under Biden is likely higher than even his administration reports, border officials say.

"This is a failure," RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel wrote in a statement. "Joe Biden and Democrats created a humanitarian crisis at our southern border that only worsens, yet they can't be bothered to fix it.

"As Democrats turn a blind eye to the devastation they created, Americans face the consequences every day as deadly fentanyl pours into our neighborhoods and crime surges across the country. Republicans know families deserve to feel safe, but it's clear Democrats couldn't care less."

Former Trump administration border leaders had vowed to release the border crossing data through end of fiscal year 2022 (Sept. 30) by Tuesday if the administration had not released it, but they predicted it would ultimately come Friday to avert heavy news coverage.

The Biden administration's 2022 illegal migrant total is a 419% increase over the Trump administration.

"Former Trump immigration officials Ken Cuccinelli, Mark Morgan, and Tom Homan say they will release CBP's September border arrest figures themselves if the Biden admin fails to do so by Tuesday (under Biden, CBP has taken longer to release the monthly stats)," a Reuters reporter tweeted Friday before the numbers arrived.

The numbers that were delivered were record-breaking and potentially tough for Democrat candidates to sell before Nov. 8's midterm election final vote. Early voting is under way in many states already.

The September totals were the highest number of illegal crossings in Department of Homeland Security history, which spans two decades sent put in place by former President George W. Bush after 9/11.

Another the data lowlights, according to the RNC press release:

  • 374% increase from the average number of September apprehensions during the Trump administration.
  • 11,900 unaccompanied children were apprehended.
  • 128,121 illegal immigrants were apprehended from countries outside the Northern Triangle and Mexico, showing that Biden's crisis is global.
  • 98 people on the terror watchlist have been apprehended trying to enter the U.S. between ports of entry since the fiscal year began last October.
  • 1,826 pounds of deadly fentanyl (414 million doses – enough to kill everyone in the U.S.) and 10,612 pounds of methamphetamine were seized at the southern border in September alone, with much more likely getting through.
  • More fentanyl has crossed the border in the last two months under Biden than in all of fiscal year 2019 under former President Donald Trump's leadership.

"If they're seizing a lot, it's because a lot is coming in," Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Joshua Sharfstein said in a statement, according to the RNC.

Original Article

Biden Breaks His Annual Record With 2.3M Illegal Border Crossings

Biden Breaks His Annual Record With 2.3M Illegal Border Crossings (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Eric Mack | Saturday, 22 October 2022 09:48 AM EDT

President Joe Biden predictably released his record-breaking illegal migrant border crossing data Friday night, mitigating news coverage, but the Republican National Committee pounced Saturday morning.

More than 2.3 million illegal immigrants have crossed the border year, breaking the record Biden's administration set a year ago with a 37% increase. The total of the two record-setting years of illegal migration under the Biden administration is now 4.7 million.

That figure includes 3.8 million illegals apprehended by Customs and Border Protection and more than 900,000 know gotaways that have escaped Border Patrol. That suggests the number of illegal migrants coming to the U.S. under Biden is likely higher than even his administration reports, border officials say.

"This is a failure," RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel wrote in a statement. "Joe Biden and Democrats created a humanitarian crisis at our southern border that only worsens, yet they can't be bothered to fix it.

"As Democrats turn a blind eye to the devastation they created, Americans face the consequences every day as deadly fentanyl pours into our neighborhoods and crime surges across the country. Republicans know families deserve to feel safe, but it's clear Democrats couldn't care less."

Former Trump administration border leaders had vowed to release the border crossing data through end of fiscal year 2022 (Sept. 30) by Tuesday if the administration had not released it, but they predicted it would ultimately come Friday to avert heavy news coverage.

The Biden administration's 2022 illegal migrant total is a 419% increase over the Trump administration.

"Former Trump immigration officials Ken Cuccinelli, Mark Morgan, and Tom Homan say they will release CBP's September border arrest figures themselves if the Biden admin fails to do so by Tuesday (under Biden, CBP has taken longer to release the monthly stats)," a Reuters reporter tweeted Friday before the numbers arrived.

The numbers that were delivered were record-breaking and potentially tough for Democrat candidates to sell before Nov. 8's midterm election final vote. Early voting is under way in many states already.

The September totals were the highest number of illegal crossings in Department of Homeland Security history, which spans two decades sent put in place by former President George W. Bush after 9/11.

Another the data lowlights, according to the RNC press release:

  • 374% increase from the average number of September apprehensions during the Trump administration.
  • 11,900 unaccompanied children were apprehended.
  • 128,121 illegal immigrants were apprehended from countries outside the Northern Triangle and Mexico, showing that Biden's crisis is global.
  • 98 people on the terror watchlist have been apprehended trying to enter the U.S. between ports of entry since the fiscal year began last October.
  • 1,826 pounds of deadly fentanyl (414 million doses – enough to kill everyone in the U.S.) and 10,612 pounds of methamphetamine were seized at the southern border in September alone, with much more likely getting through.
  • More fentanyl has crossed the border in the last two months under Biden than in all of fiscal year 2019 under former President Donald Trump's leadership.

"If they're seizing a lot, it's because a lot is coming in," Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Joshua Sharfstein said in a statement, according to the RNC.

Trump hires legal firm to deal with J6 CMTE subpoena

PHOENIX, ARIZONA - JULY 24: Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the Rally To Protect Our Elections conference on July 24, 2021 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Phoenix-based political organization Turning Point Action hosted former President Donald Trump alongside GOP Arizona candidates who have begun candidacy for government elected roles. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the Rally To Protect Our Elections conference on July 24, 2021 in Phoenix, Arizona. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 3:14 PM PT – Friday, October 21, 2022

Former President Donald J. Trump has hired a conservative-led legal firm to address the subpoena against him from the January 6th Committee.

A Politico report on Thursday revealed that the 45th president will be represented by the Dhillon Law Group. The firm, co-managed by RNC Committeewoman Harmeet Dhillon (R-Calif.), already represents multiple witnesses targeted by the panel, including Michael Flynn.

This comes as the committee formally served Trump a subpoena on Friday. The January 6th Committee is seeking Trump’s testimony for a deposition on November 14th.

On Thursday, panel member Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) announced that the committee has no plans to release a report before the midterms.

“I don’t believe that we’ll have an interim report,” Lofgren said. “If there is pressing information that we’d receive or something that we think fills in the picture in an important way, we might release that, but we’re busily writing the report and putting together plans to release it. So, there’s no way it could be done in the next 19 days.”

Trump denies any wrongdoing in relation to January 6th.

Original Article Oann

Kari Lake to Newsmax: Female Empowerment Never Applies to Republican Women

Kari Lake to Newsmax: Female Empowerment Never Applies to Republican Women

(Newsmax/"Prime News")

By Luca Cacciatore | Friday, 21 October 2022 10:09 PM EDT

Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake told Newsmax that the Democratic Party and liberal media’s female empowerment narrative never seems to apply to Republican women.

During a Friday appearance on "Prime News," Lake pointed to the hypocrisy of those pushing for new female leaders who do not support Republican ones, like herself.

"How many times was the wonderful [former] first lady Melania Trump ever on a magazine cover? I think zero. I don't remember seeing it," the GOP nominee said. "So they love to trash Republican women. And you know what? We have the better ideas."

Lake also called out fellow Republicans that "cower to the media" and fall into their narratives, advocating instead for elected officials to "go on the offense" against the biased media.

"That's what I've done. I've done it on all of the issues. When they go after the election, I've gone on the offense. When they go after Republicans for wanting to save lives with being pro-life, I throw it right back in their face that they are the radical ones.

"I hope I'm teaching Republicans that we have nothing to back down from," she continued. "We have nothing to cower to because we have the best ideas, and we have the best solutions to the problems of this moment."

With her Democratic opponent Katie Hobbs not accepting a debate, Lake attributed the move to the current Arizona secretary of state, showing that "she has no respect" for her constituents.

"This is a job interview. We are applying for the job of governor of Arizona, and the boss is the people of Arizona. This is our chance to go before the people, tell them what our plans are for this great state … and she's afraid."

According to a RealClearPolitics average of polls conducted in the Arizona gubernatorial race thus far, Lake currently leads Hobbs by 1.6 percentage points, 47.8% to 46.2%, roughly three weeks from Election Day.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn’t Matter Without ‘Settled Law’

Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn't Matter Without 'Settled Law' Giuliani to Newsmax: Trump Subpoena Shouldn't Matter Without 'Settled Law' Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. (Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

By Jay Clemons | Friday, 21 October 2022 09:30 PM EDT

Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor and onetime legal counsel to former President Donald Trump, says the House committee investigating the January 6, 2021, unrest at the Capitol has no business ordering a subpoena for Trump, given how the federal courts have yet to rule on how "executive privilege" applies to contempt-of-Congress proceedings.

"If we were a country of laws, like we used to be," the Jan. 6 committee's subpoena would have minimal impact on Trump, Giuliani told Newsmax Friday evening, while appearing on "Eric Bolling The Balance."

"The courts should have worked out the law" in terms of the "full extent of executive privilege" before the Jan. 6 hearings took place, added Giuliani.

"This is not settled law," lamented Giuliani, while adding that no Democrat held in contempt has ever "been put in prison — let alone fined."

Giuliani offered another line of rationale for Trump keeping his options open, testimony-wise, while the courts potentially work through "executive privilege" matters, related to the Jan. 6 incident.

"The Jan. 6 committee is a [group] made up of proven liars," said Giuliani, while claiming that each Democrat member of the Jan. 6 panel touted the "myth" of Russian collusion during President Trump's four-year tenure in office.

Giuliani asserts the Democrat committee members also fought to conceal the truth about Hunter Biden's now-infamous laptop back in October 2020 — just weeks before the Trump-Biden presidential battle.

"Who was telling the truth about that? Trump was. Trump was right about Russian collusion — there was none," says Giuliani.

The way Giuliani sees it, Trump was also right about Hunter Biden's laptop being independently verified and "no quid pro quo" taking place with Ukraine — which was the primary reason for Trump's first impeachment hearing.

As such, Giuliani cannot fathom how the Jan. 6 committee has been given so much power to investigate "an insurrection without a single person there having a gun. Exactly how are you going to overthrow a government without a gun? … If it wasn't so serious, it'd be a joke."

Giuliani also found the Friday jail sentence handed down to former Trump adviser Steve Bannon (four months) to be similarly laughable.

"It's an example of the police state we live in," said Giuliani.

From Giuliani's perspective, Bannon was condemned before the courts had a chance to rule on what constitutes a crime with contempt-of-Congress charges, as it pertains to executive privilege.

"It's a case that [should have been appealed] through the Supreme Court before anyone decides to put him in prison," reasoned Giuliani. "How many Democrats have been held in contempt, and zero happens" to them?

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Save America PAC Responds to Trump’s Jan. 6 Panel Subpoena

Save America PAC Responds to Trump's Jan. 6 Panel Subpoena

(Newsmax/"Saturday Report")

By Luca Cacciatore | Friday, 21 October 2022 08:04 PM EDT

Donald Trump's Save America PAC rushed to his defense on Friday, issuing a fundraising email that condemns the House Jan. 6 committee's decision to subpoena the former president.

"The January 6th Unselect Committee just voted to SUBPOENA the 45th President of the United States. 18 DAYS before the Midterm Elections, America is truly a Nation in decline," the email read.

"Instead of using their final days in power to better America, the Democrats are coming after OUR President and demeaning our great Country at YOUR expense. They have no interest in leading our great Nation. They are bitter, power-hungry, and desperate to win in November," it added.

The political action committee also pointed out past probes into Trump that it said have come up empty, including the Robert Mueller investigation, two impeachment trials and the alleged FBI spying on his 2016 presidential campaign.

"Stand with President Trump," the message further pleads.

The fundraising email serves as the second response directly affiliated with the former president to the Jan. 6 panel, which issued a letter to Trump's lawyers demanding his testimony under oath by Nov. 14.

In addition, the committee is seeking from Trump all sensitive documents and private communications with relevant individuals related to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

"We recognize that a subpoena to a former president is a significant and historic action," wrote committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., and Vice Chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo. "We do not take this action lightly."

"In short, you were at the center of the first and only effort by any U.S. president to overturn an election and obstruct the peaceful transition of power, ultimately culminating in a bloody attack on our own Capitol and on the Congress itself," the two wrote.

Earlier Friday, Trump lawyer David Warrington issued a statement condemning the subpoena, The Associated Press reported.

"We understand that, once again, flouting norms and appropriate and customary process, the committee has publicly released a copy of its subpoena," Warrington said. "As with any similar matter, we will review and analyze it and will respond as appropriate to this unprecedented action."

Original Article

Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe

Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe Graham Asks Supreme Court to Shield Him From Testifying in Election Probe Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaks at the U.S. Capitol. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

By Nicole Wells | Friday, 21 October 2022 07:05 PM EDT

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., on Friday asked the Supreme Court to step in and shield him from testifying before the Atlanta-based special grand jury investigating former President Donald Trump's alleged interference in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia.

According to CNN, the Palmetto State Republican filed the emergency request after the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday ruled that the grand jury could compel his testimony, siding with a lower court decision.

While Graham contends that his actions in Georgia after the 2020 election were protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause, the three-judge appellate panel found that "communications and coordination with the Trump campaign regarding its post-election efforts in Georgia, public statements regarding the 2020 election, and efforts to 'cajole' or 'exhort' Georgia election officials" are not constitutionally protected.

Friday's appeal was filed with Justice Clarence Thomas, who oversees the 11th Circuit, according to CNN, and Thomas is likely to refer the matter to the full court.

The investigation into alleged efforts by Trump and his supporters to change the 2020 election results is being led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

According to CNN, an hour-long phone call from Trump to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger in January 2021 triggered the investigation. Trump allegedly asked Raffensperger to "find" the votes needed for him to win the state.

On Friday, Graham asked the justices to halt the lower court order while legal challenges unfold.

"This Court's action is necessary to allow this appeal to be heard before it becomes moot — before, that is, Senator Graham suffers the constitutional injury this appeal is meant to avoid," the filing said.

Graham claims in the new court filing that the information from officials in Georgia was necessary to perform his legislative duties and should be protected by the Speech or Debate clause of the Constitution.

As chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Graham said that he is tasked with "reviewing election-related issues" and the information was necessary for an "impending vote on certifying the election."

"After the phone calls, Senator Graham relied on the information gained from the calls both to vote Joe Biden the 'legitimate President of the United States' and to co-sponsor legislation to amend the Electoral Count Act," the filing said.

Original Article

Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has ‘Blank Check’ With Biden in Power

Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has 'Blank Check' With Biden in Power Retired Brig. Gen. Holt: Iran Has 'Blank Check' With Biden in Power (Newsmax/"The Chris Salcedo Show")

By Solange Reyner | Friday, 21 October 2022 05:34 PM EDT

Iran has a "blank check" to do whatever it wants with President Joe Biden in power, including directly engaging on the ground in Crimea supporting Russian drone attacks on Ukraine's power stations and other key infrastructure, says Retired Brig. Air Force Gen. Blaine Holt.

"They've got a blank check to do whatever they'd like to do," Holt, the former deputy U.S. military representative to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, said Friday during an appearance on Newsmax TV's "The Chris Salcedo Show."

"The drones which they say, 'Oh, they're not Iranian,' they have a very unique visual signature. That that's what it is and now they've got advisers on the ground so they're in the war, they're aligned with Russia. What's interesting here is this is the same organization we wanted the Russians to broker a nuclear peace deal with and we were going to pay them millions of bucks and this is the respect they give the sanctions that are imposed by UN Security Council Resolution? So, I think the whole thing is actually quite laughable."

National Security Council spokesman John Kirby told reporters that Iran has sent a "relatively small number" of personnel to Crimea, a part of Ukraine unilaterally annexed by Russia in contravention of international law in 2014, to assist Russian troops in launching Iranian-made drones against Ukraine. Members of a branch of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps were dispatched to assist Russian forces in using the drones, according to the British government.

The revelation of the U.S. intelligence finding comes as the Biden administration seeks to mount international pressure on Tehran to pull back from helping Russia as it bombards soft Ukrainian civilian targets with the help of Iranian-made drones.

The Russians in recent days have increasingly turned to the Iranian-supplied drones, as well as Kalibr and Iskander cruise missiles, to carry out a barrage of attacks against Ukrainian infrastructure and non-military targets. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said this week that Russian forces have destroyed 30% of Ukraine’s power stations since Oct. 10.

Retired Lt. Col. Tony Shaffer said the larger warfare is being missed, though, as China is "ganging up" with Russia to remove the dollar as the fiat currency the world uses for energy and "we're just kind of letting it happen," he told Salcedo.

"There's a long-term strategy that the Chinese and Russians are doing to undermine our economic power. Much of our ability to do things globally is because we are the big dog on the block, President Trump recognized that. … I think it's very clear at this point, the more they can cooperate on energy and get the Saudis to come over to their side, which we've seen, the more chances of the dollar being removed, taking the bottom out of the dollar, taking the bottom out of our buying power, and therefore weakening us across the board. It's this economic warfare that we're not paying sufficient attention to."

Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.

Original Article

Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China

Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China Report: Classified Papers Seized From Trump Home Held US Secrets on Iran, China Mar-a-Lago (Getty Images)

Friday, 21 October 2022 05:02 PM EDT

Highly sensitive intelligence on Iran and China was in some of the documents recovered by the FBI during an August search of former U.S. President Donald Trump's home in Florida, The Washington Post reported on Friday, citing people familiar with the matter.

They included secret documents that described intelligence work regarding China and at least one of them described Iran's missile program, the report said, adding that the documents were considered to be among the most sensitive in the materials seized by the FBI.

The release of information in these documents would pose multiple risks, including endangering people helping U.S. intelligence efforts and compromising collection efforts, the newspaper cited experts as saying.

The U.S. Justice Department is investigating whether Trump broke the law by taking government records, including about 100 classified documents, to his Florida estate after leaving office in January 2021.

The department is also looking into whether Trump or his team obstructed justice when the FBI sent agents to search his home, and has warned that more classified documents may still be missing.

Representatives for Trump did not immediately reply to a request for comment on the newspaper report. The Justice Department did not respond to a request for confirmation of the Post report.

Original Article

Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms

Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms Sen. Rick Scott: GOP Could Hold Up to 55 Senate Seats After Midterms Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., speaks at a Herschel Walker campaign event in Carrollton, Georgia. (Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images)

By Jay Clemons | Friday, 21 October 2022 04:11 PM EDT

Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., has a midterm elections prediction that goes beyond the Republicans simply breaking the 50-all tie in the Senate.

Republicans could get a net positive of five Senate seats next month, an assessment that would give the GOP a plus-10 advantage in the Senate.

"It starts right here. We're going to get 52 Republican senators. We have to win here," Scott said Thursday at a campaign event in North Carolina, while stumping for Rep. Ted Budd, R-N.C., who's running for a U.S. Senate seat.

"I think we can get 53, 54, 55. The energy is on our side. People are fed up with the Biden agenda," Scott added.

Scott, who is also the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), has been more optimistic about the Republicans' chances in November than Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who recently drew criticism from within his own party after being lukewarm about the Senate GOP's electoral prospects.

The 52-to-55-seat prediction from Scott runs in direct contrast to Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

Last month, Peters professed the possibility of the Senate Democrats holding 52 seats when Congress reconvenes in January.

In a recent New York Times-Siena College poll, the majority of survey respondents favored the Republicans' message/track record for handling the majority — by a 34-point margin (64% Republicans/30% Democrats).

For that same poll, the respondents identified the U.S. economy/high inflation as the No. 1 issue heading into the midterms.

Earlier this month on Newsmax, Dick Morris, a political strategist, best-selling author, and adviser to former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump, said a GOP "sweep" of the battleground races within the Senate chamber could happen.

Morris, the author of "The Return: Trump's Big 2024 Comeback," said on "Rob Schmitt Tonight" that his internal polling shows some of the "sleeper races" leaning toward the GOP candidates.

And Morris believes that three GOP candidates — Dr. Mehmet Oz (Pennsylvania), Blake Masters (Arizona), and Herschel Walker (Georgia) — will deliver a Senate victory for the Republicans.

"If Oz wins, as I think he can, and we picked up at least one of those other two seats — like Masters' — I think that we can win, and we'll win with 52 or 53 seats," Morris said. "But I want to stress that it is possible this year to just clean up. We could win all of these races because the polling is so pro-Democrat in its bias."

Original Article

Federal Judge makes decision in Steve Bannon case

Steve Bannon, center, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump and convicted of contempt of Congress, accompanied by his attorneys David Schoen, left, and Evan Corcoran, right, speaks to the media as he leaves the federal courthouse on Friday, Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington. Bannon was sentenced to 4 months behind bars for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena. ( AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Steve Bannon, center, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump and convicted of contempt of Congress, accompanied by his attorneys David Schoen, left, and Evan Corcoran, right, speaks to the media as he leaves the federal courthouse on Friday, Oct. 21, 2022, in Washington. Bannon was sentenced to 4 months behind bars for defying a Jan. 6 committee subpoena. ( AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Caitlin Sinclair – NY Political Correspondent
UPDATED 9:05 AM PT – Friday, October 21, 2022

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon was sentenced to 4 months in prison and a $6,500 fine in D.C. federal court Friday. The judge will allow Bannon to appeal before serving that sentence.

Bannon was convicted in July on two contempt of Congress charges for ignoring subpoenas from the House committee investigating January 6th.

Prior to sentencing, a stoic and steadfast Bannon made a comment to reporters as supporters surrounded the courthouse.

“Remember, this illegitimate regime, their judgment day is on 8 November, when the Biden administration ends … By the way, and remember: Take down the CCP.”

The House panel had sought Bannon’s testimony over his involvement in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Bannon has yet to testify or provide any documents to the committee, prosecutors wrote.

The defense, meanwhile, said he wasn’t acting in bad faith, but trying to avoid running afoul of executive privilege objections Trump had raised when Bannon was first served with a committee subpoena last year. The former presidential adviser said he wanted a Trump lawyer in the room, but the committee wouldn’t allow it.

Banon spoke outside the courtroom after the hearing saying:

“I respect the judge. The sentence he came down with today is his decision. … I’ve been totally respectful of this entire process on the legal side,”

Friday’s sentencing took place one year to the day after the House voted to hold Bannon in contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the subpoena.

Original Article Oann

Online School Put US Kids Behind; Some Adults Have Regrets

Online School Put US Kids Behind; Some Adults Have Regrets schools closed written on a blackboard (Dreamstime)

BIANCA VÁZQUEZ TONESS and JOCELYN GECKER Friday, 21 October 2022 03:43 PM EDT

Vivian Kargbo thought her daughter’s Boston school district was doing the right thing when officials kept classrooms closed for most students for more than a year.

Kargbo, a caregiver for hospice patients, didn't want to risk them getting COVID-19. And extending pandemic school closures through the spring of 2021 is what many in her community said was best to keep kids and adults safe.

But her daughter became depressed and stopped doing school work or paying attention to online classes. The former honor-roll student failed nearly all of her eighth grade courses.

“She’s behind,” said Kargbo, whose daughter is now in tenth grade. “It didn’t work at all. Knowing what I know now, I would say they should have put them in school.”

Preliminary test scores around the country confirm what Kargbo witnessed: The longer many students studied remotely, the less they learned. Some educators and parents are questioning decisions in cities from Boston to Chicago to Los Angeles to remain online long after clear evidence emerged that schools weren’t COVID-19 super-spreaders — and months after life-saving adult vaccines became widely available.

There are fears for the futures of students who don’t catch up. They run the risk of never learning to read, long a precursor for dropping out of school. They might never master simple algebra, putting science and tech fields out of reach. The pandemic decline in college attendance could continue to accelerate, crippling the U.S. economy.

In a sign of how inflammatory the debate has become, there’s sharp disagreement among educators, school leaders and parents even about how to label the problems created by online school. “Learning loss” has become a lightning rod. Some fear the term might brand struggling students or cast blame on teachers, and they say it overlooks the need to save lives during a pandemic.

Regardless of what it’s called, the casualties of Zoom school are real.

The scale of the problem and the challenges in addressing it were apparent in Associated Press interviews with nearly 50 school leaders, teachers, parents and health officials, who struggled to agree on a way forward.

Some public health officials and educators warned against second-guessing the school closures for a virus that killed over a million people in the U.S. More than 200,000 children lost at least one parent.

“It is very easy with hindsight to say, ‘Oh, learning loss, we should have opened.’ People forget how many people died,” said Austin Beutner, former superintendent in Los Angeles, where students were online from mid-March 2020 until the start of hybrid instruction in April 2021.

The question isn’t merely academic.

School closures continued last year because of teacher shortages and COVID-19 spread. It’s conceivable another pandemic might emerge — or a different crisis.

But there’s another reason for asking what lessons have been learned: the kids who have fallen behind. Some third graders struggle to sound out words. Some ninth graders have given up on school because they feel so behind they can’t catch up. The future of American children hangs in the balance.

Many adults are pushing to move on, to stop talking about the impact of the pandemic — especially learning loss.

“As crazy as this sounds now, I’m afraid people are going to forget about the pandemic,” said Jason Kamras, superintendent in Richmond, Virginia. "People will say, ‘That was two years ago. Get over it.’”

When COVID-19 first reached the U.S., scientists didn’t fully understand how it spread or whether it was harmful to children. American schools, like most around the world, understandably shuttered in March 2020.

That summer, scientists learned kids didn’t face the same risks as adults, but experts couldn’t decide how to operate schools safely — or whether it was even possible.

It was already clear that remote learning was devastating for many young people. But did the risks of social isolation and falling behind outweigh the risks of children, school staff and families catching the virus?

The tradeoffs differed depending on how vulnerable a community felt. Black and Latino people, who historically had less access to health care, remain nearly twice as likely to die of COVID-19 than white people. Parents in those communities often had deep-rooted doubts about whether schools could keep their children safe.

Politics was a factor, too. Districts that reopened in person tended to be in areas that voted for President Donald Trump or had largely white populations.

By winter, studies showed schools weren’t contributing to increased COVID-19 spread in the community. Classes with masked students and distancing could be conducted safely, growing evidence said. President Joe Biden prioritized reopening schools when he took office in January 2021, and once the COVID-19 vaccine was available, some Democratic-leaning districts started to reopen.

Yet many schools stayed closed well into the spring, including in California, where the state’s powerful teachers unions fought returning to classrooms, citing lack of safety protocols.

In Chicago, after a six-week standoff with the teachers union, the district started bringing students back on a hybrid schedule just before spring 2021. It wasn’t until the fall that students were back in school full time.

Marla Williams initially supported Chicago Public Schools' decision to instruct students online during the fall of 2020. Williams, a single mother, has asthma, as do her two children. While she was working, she enlisted her father, a retired teacher, to supervise her children’s studies.

Her father would log into his grandson’s classes from his suburban home and try to monitor what was happening. But it didn’t work.

Her son lost motivation and wouldn’t do his assignments. Once he went back on a hybrid schedule in spring 2021, he started doing well again, Williams said.

“I wish we’d been in person earlier,” she said. “Other schools seemed to be doing it successfully.”

Officials were divided in Chicago. The city Department of Public Health advocated reopening schools months earlier, in the fall of 2020. The commissioner, Dr. Allison Arwady, said they felt the risk of missing education was higher than the risk of COVID-19. Others, such as the director of the Institute for Global Health at Northwestern University, advocated for staying remote.

“I think the answer on that has been settled fairly clearly, especially once we had vaccines available,” Arwady said. “I’m concerned about the loss that has occurred.”

From March 2020 to June 2021, the average student in Chicago lost 21 weeks of learning in reading and 20 weeks in math, equivalent to missing half a year of school, according to Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab, which analyzed data from a widely used test called MAP to estimate learning loss for every U.S. school district.

Nationally, kids whose schools met mostly online in the 2020-2021 school year performed 13 percentage points lower in math and 8 percentage points lower in reading compared with schools meeting mostly in person, according to a 2022 study by Brown University economist Emily Oster.

The setbacks have some grappling with regret.

“I can’t imagine a situation where we would close schools again, unless there’s a virus attacking kids,” said Eric Conti, superintendent for Burlington, Massachusetts, a 3,400-student district outside Boston. His students alternated between online and in-person learning from the fall of 2020 until the next spring. “It’s going to be a very high bar.”

Dallas Superintendent Stephanie Elizalde initially disagreed with the Texas governor’s push to reopen schools in the fall of 2020. “But it was absolutely the right thing to do,” she said.

Some school officials said they lacked the expertise to decide whether it was safe to open schools.

“Schools should never have been placed in a situation where we have choice,” said Tony Wold, former associate superintendent of West Contra Costa Unified School District, east of San Francisco. “With lessons learned, when you have a public health pandemic, there needs to be a single voice.”

Still, many school officials said with hindsight they’d make the same decision to keep schools online well into 2021. Only two superintendents said they’d likely make a different decision if there were another pandemic that was not particularly dangerous to children.

In some communities, demographics and the historic underinvestment in schools loomed large, superintendents said. In the South, Black Americans’ fear of the virus was sometimes coupled with mistrust of schools rooted in segregation. Cities from Atlanta to Nashville to Jackson, Mississippi, shuttered schools — in some cases, for nearly all of the 2020-2021 school year.

In Clayton County, Georgia, home to the state’s highest percentage of Black residents, schools chief Morcease Beasley said he knew closing schools would have a devastating impact, but the fear in his community was overwhelming.

“I knew teachers couldn’t teach if they were that scared, and students couldn’t learn,” he said.

Rhode Island was an outlier among liberal-leaning coastal states when it ordered schools to reopen in person in the fall of 2020. “We can’t do this to our kids,” state education chief Angélica Infante-Green remembers thinking after watching students turn off cameras or log in from under blankets in bed. “This is not OK.”

But in the predominantly Latino and Black Rhode Island community of Central Falls, more than three-quarters of students stayed home to study remotely.

To address parent distrust, officials tracked COVID-19 cases among school-aged Central Falls residents. They met with families to show them the kids catching the virus were in remote learning — and they weren’t learning as much as students in school. It worked.

Among teachers, there’s some dispute about online learning's impact on children. But many fear some students will be scarred for years.

“Should we have reopened earlier? Absolutely,” said California teacher Sarah Curry. She initially favored school closings in her rural Central Valley district, but grew frustrated with the duration of distance learning. She taught pre-kindergarten and found it impossible to maintain attention spans online.

One of her biggest regrets: that teachers who wanted to return to classrooms had little choice in the matter.

But the nation’s 3 million public school teachers are far from a monolith. Many lost loved ones to COVID-19, battled mental health challenges of their own or feared catching the virus.

Jessica Cross, who taught ninth grade math on Chicago’s west side at Phoenix Military Academy, feels her school reopened too soon.

“I didn’t feel entirely safe,” she said. Mask rules were good in theory, but not all students wore them properly. She said safety should come before academics.

“Ultimately, I still feel that remote learning was really the only thing to do,” Cross said.

A representative from the American Federation of Teachers declined in an interview to address whether the union regrets the positions teachers took against reopening schools.

“If we start to play the blame game," said Fedrick Ingram, AFT’s secretary-treasurer, “we get into the political fray of trying to determine if teachers did a good job or not. And I don’t think that’s fair.”

Regrets or no, experts agree: America’s kids need more from adults if they’re going to be made whole.

The country needs “ideally, a reinvention of public education as we know it,” Los Angeles Superintendent Alberto Carvalho said. Students need more days in school and smaller classes.

Short of extending the school year, experts say intensive tutoring is the most efficient way to help students catch up. Saturday school or doubling up on math or reading during a regular school day would also help.

Too few school districts have made those investments, Harvard economist Tom Kane said. Summer school is insufficient, Kane says — it’s voluntary, and many parents don’t sign up.

Adding school time for students is politically impossible in many cities. In Los Angeles, the teachers union filed a complaint after the district scheduled four optional school days for students to recoup learning. The school board in Richmond rejected a move to an all-year school calendar.

There are exceptions: Atlanta extended the school day 30 minutes for three years. Hopewell Schools in Virginia moved to year-round schooling last year.

Even the federal government’s record education spending isn’t enough for the scope of kids’ academic setbacks, according to the American Educational Research Association. Researchers there estimate it will cost $700 billion to offset learning loss for America’s schoolchildren – more than three times the $190 billion allocated to schools.

“We need something on the scale of the Marshall Plan for education,” said Kamras, the Richmond superintendent. “Anything short of that and we’re going to see this blip in outcomes become permanent for a generation of children — and that would be criminal.”

Gecker reported from San Francisco. Collin Binkley in Washington, D.C., Sharon Lurye in New Orleans, Arleigh Rodgers in Indianapolis, Claire Savage in Chicago and Brooke Schultz in Harrisburg, Pa., contributed to this report.

Rodgers, Savage and Schultz are corps members for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.