Trump: Biden, Putin Have World on Brink of Nuclear World War

Trump: Biden, Putin Have World on Brink of Nuclear World War (Newsmax)

By Eric Mack | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 11:41 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump is blasting the Biden administration for not holding Russian President Vladimir Putin at bay, possibly putting the world on the brink of a nuclear World War III.

"President Putin of Russia is now threatening the use of nuclear weapons, saying 'it is not a bluff,'" Trump wrote Wednesday on Truth Social. "The Ukrainian conflict should never have happened, and would not have happened if I were President. But as I have made very clear for quite some time, this could now end up being World War III."

Trump's statement comes after Putin called for the first mobilization of reservists in Russia since World War II. Putin, in a seven-minute televised address to the nation, also warned the West he is not bluffing about using everything at his disposal to protect Russia — an apparent reference to his nuclear arsenal.

Putin has previously told the West not to back Russia against the wall and has rebuked NATO countries for supplying weapons to Ukraine.

Putin's address coincided with President Joe Biden's address to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Wednesday, where Biden said Russia has "shamelessly violated the core tenets" of the U.N. charter with its "brutal, needless war" in Ukraine.

Delivering a forceful condemnation of Russia's invasion to the international body, Biden said reports of Russian abuses against civilians in Ukraine "should make your blood run cold." He also said Putin's new nuclear threats against Europe showed "reckless disregard" for his nation's responsibilities as a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

"We will stand in solidarity against Russia’s aggression; period," Biden told the UNGA.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Original Article

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems’ Immigration Hypocrisy ‘Knows No Bounds’

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems' Immigration Hypocrisy 'Knows No Bounds' rep. pat fallon speaking during a hearing Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas (Getty Images)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 09:11 AM EDT

Democrats' hypocrisy regarding immigration "knows no bounds," Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, told Newsmax.

Fallon, appearing on Wednesday's "Wake Up America," was asked about New York City Mayor Eric Adams threatening to sue Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over the busing of migrants from the southern border to the Big Apple.

"The hypocrisy knows no bounds," Fallon told host Alison Maloni. "You know what? If they [liberals] didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all, quite frankly."

Another example of Democrats' hypocrisy concerns migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

"I have to laugh when liberals say sending 58 migrants to Martha's Vineyard is a humanitarian crisis," Fallon told Newsmax." "How about the millions that have been crossing in Texas."

Fallon was asked about Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser creating an Office of Migrant Services to assist migrants being bused to her city.

"How about securing the border? That would be something," Fallon told Maloni. "Let's look at the tale of the tape here. In April of this year, we had 234,000 illegal border crossings – that's 1,258% higher than the last April President Trump was in office. And then in May, it was 240,000, which was 930% higher than the last May that President Trump was in office. And from April to August, if you include known got-aways, we're talking about somewhere between 1.3 and 1.5 million illegal border crossings in five months.

"We had never seen a year where we had more 2 million encounters … we're already there. That could be, really, 3 or 4 million in the coming years … 5 million … this is unsustainable."

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000. That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"[Vice President] Kamala Harris has said that the border is secure. This is their definition of secure – 1.5 million over the last five months," Fallon told Newsmax. "Ten thousand pounds of fentanyl has been seized in this fiscal year which is enough to kill every American about seven or eight times over. That's their definition of 'secure.' A hundred and seven thousand Americans have died of opioid overdoses just last year.

"The border is wide open. It is porous and we need to recognize that fact so that we can correct it. Because it is not a crisis, it is a catastrophe."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems’ Immigration Hypocrisy ‘Knows No Bounds’

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems' Immigration Hypocrisy 'Knows No Bounds' rep. pat fallon speaking during a hearing Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas (Getty Images)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 09:58 AM EDT

Democrats' hypocrisy regarding immigration "knows no bounds," Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, told Newsmax.

Fallon, appearing on Wednesday's "Wake Up America," was asked about New York City Mayor Eric Adams threatening to sue Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over the busing of migrants from the southern border to the Big Apple.

"The hypocrisy knows no bounds," Fallon told host Alison Maloni. "You know what? If they [liberals] didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all, quite frankly."

Another example of Democrats' hypocrisy concerns migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

"I have to laugh when liberals say sending 58 migrants to Martha's Vineyard is a humanitarian crisis," Fallon told Newsmax." "How about the millions that have been crossing in Texas."

Fallon was asked about Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser creating an Office of Migrant Services to assist migrants being bused to her city.

"How about securing the border? That would be something," Fallon told Maloni. "Let's look at the tale of the tape here. In April of this year, we had 234,000 illegal border crossings – that's 1,258% higher than the last April President Trump was in office. And then in May, it was 240,000, which was 930% higher than the last May that President Trump was in office. And from April to August, if you include known got-aways, we're talking about somewhere between 1.3 and 1.5 million illegal border crossings in five months.

"We had never seen a year where we had more than 2 million encounters … we're already there. That could be, really, 3 or 4 million in the coming years … 5 million … this is unsustainable."

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000. That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"[Vice President] Kamala Harris has said that the border is secure. This is their definition of secure – 1.5 million over the last five months," Fallon told Newsmax. "Ten thousand pounds of fentanyl has been seized in this fiscal year which is enough to kill every American about seven or eight times over. That's their definition of 'secure.' A hundred and seven thousand Americans have died of opioid overdoses just last year.

"The border is wide open. It is porous, and we need to recognize that fact so that we can correct it. Because it is not a crisis, it is a catastrophe."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Trump: Wall, ‘Remain in Mexico’ Produced Strong Southern Border

Trump: Wall, 'Remain in Mexico' Produced Strong Southern Border (Newsmax)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 08:31 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump reminded people that an all-time southern border crisis did not exist under his administration.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000.

That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"Remember, just two years ago we had the strongest and best Southern Border in U.S. history," Trump posted on Truth Social early Wednesday morning. "They weren't coming up and through because they knew that it was going to be very hard to come in, and stay in. That's the best Border policy of them all, by far. I built the Wall, and then added more. Remain in Mexico, we said. It all worked!!!"

Trump's Remain in Mexico policy — officially called Migrant Protection Protocols — forced migrants to remain south of the border to await their asylum hearing in U.S. immigration court. President Joe Biden ended that policy in August.

The Republican National Committee, citing the Biden administration's "dereliction of duty" at the border, has made a call for midterm voters to remember the border — and their families' safety.

"Because of Biden and Democrats' dereliction of duty and open border policies, gangs are thriving, drugs are pouring into our neighborhoods, and our communities are less safe," RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel wrote in a statement Monday. "This November, Biden's border crisis will be top of mind as voters worry about the safety and security of loved ones."

Biden said Tuesday that it's "not rational" to send immigrants who illegally crossed the border back to countries such as Cuba, Nicaragua, or Venezuela.

Approximately 5 million migrants have crossed the southern border since the Biden administration took over the White House in January 2021.

Republican Govs. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., Greg Abbott, R-Texas, and Doug Ducey, R-Ariz., have transported migrants to blue jurisdictions in protest of Biden's unwillingness to sufficiently police the southern border.

Original Article

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count Chet Harhut, deputy manager, of the Allegheny County Division of Elections, wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots, at the division of elections offices in downtown Pittsburgh, May 27, 2020. (AP)

MARC LEVY Tuesday, 20 September 2022 10:26 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump and his allies seized on the drawn-out vote processing and counting in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election in support of claims that fraud cost him victory in the battleground state — and election officials worry that a replay could be on the horizon in November's crucial Senate and governor races.

And it's not just Pennsylvania. Michigan and Wisconsin are other crucial swing states that allow no-excuse mail-in ballots but give local election offices no time before Election Day to process them.

Election workers' inability to do that work ahead of time means many of the mailed ballots may not get counted on Election Day, delaying results in tight races and leaving a gaping hole for misinformation to potentially surge.

“That time between the polls closing on election night and the last vote being counted is really being exploited by people who want to undermine confidence in the process,” said Al Schmidt, a Philadelphia election commissioner during the 2020 presidential election who is now president and CEO of the good-government group Committee of Seventy.

The first step in processing mailed ballots, or pre-canvassing, is a routine but crucial administrative task that allows election workers to verify voters’ signatures and addresses, or spot problems that could be fixed by voters. Once ballots are deemed valid, they are removed from their envelopes — another time-consuming task — so they are ready to be counted on Election Day.

Not in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, though. Thirty-eight other states — including Republican-controlled ones such as Florida, Georgia and Texas — allow mailed ballots to be processed before Election Day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

For the three critical battleground states, such objections fall flat. Efforts since 2020 to give local election workers more time before Election Day to process mailed ballots have died in Republican-controlled legislatures.

Instead, Republicans in those states have sought to tighten restrictions on voting by mail — provisions vetoed by Democratic governors.

“Counting the ballots should be driven by security, not speed,” Wisconsin state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, a Republican, said earlier this year as lawmakers were considering legislation on the issue. “Why would we want to give bad actors the chance to see ballots prior to Election Day?”

Republicans helped kill a bipartisan bill that would have allowed more time for processing mailed ballots in Wisconsin amid claims that it would give partisans more time to cheat or leak vote counts early.

Like Pennsylvania, election workers in Michigan and Wisconsin must wait until Election Day to start the pre-canvassing of mailed ballots.

For now, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, requests for absentee ballots are running below 2020's rate, relieving some of the burden on local election offices.

Still, Claire Woodall-Vogg, executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, said it's "a total guess” when counting will finish in Wisconsin’s most populous county. She hopes it will wrap up by 11 p.m. on election night. A late rush of dropped-off ballots — as happened in 2020 — isn't expected this year, she said, because courts banned the use of drop boxes.

In Michigan in 2020, lawmakers agreed to give clerks in more populous cities and towns 10 hours on the day before Election Day to process mailed ballots. Clerks unsuccessfully sought a similar provision for this year. The Michigan Secretary of State's office said it was too early to estimate how many absentee ballots might be cast or how long it will take to process them.

Original Article

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count manager wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots Chet Harhut, deputy manager, of the Allegheny County Division of Elections, wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots, at the division of elections offices in downtown Pittsburgh, May 27, 2020. (AP)

MARC LEVY Tuesday, 20 September 2022 10:26 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump and his allies seized on the drawn-out vote processing and counting in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election in support of claims that fraud cost him victory in the battleground state — and election officials worry that a replay could be on the horizon in November's crucial Senate and governor races.

And it's not just Pennsylvania. Michigan and Wisconsin are other crucial swing states that allow no-excuse mail-in ballots but give local election offices no time before Election Day to process them.

Election workers' inability to do that work ahead of time means many of the mailed ballots may not get counted on Election Day, delaying results in tight races and leaving a gaping hole for misinformation to potentially surge.

"That time between the polls closing on election night and the last vote being counted is really being exploited by people who want to undermine confidence in the process," said Al Schmidt, a Philadelphia election commissioner during the 2020 presidential election who is now president and CEO of the good-government group Committee of Seventy.

The first step in processing mailed ballots, or pre-canvassing, is a routine but crucial administrative task that allows election workers to verify voters' signatures and addresses, or spot problems that could be fixed by voters. Once ballots are deemed valid, they are removed from their envelopes — another time-consuming task — so they are ready to be counted on Election Day.

Not in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though. Thirty-eight other states — including Republican-controlled ones such as Florida, Georgia, and Texas — allow mailed ballots to be processed before Election Day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

For the three critical battleground states, such objections fall flat. Efforts since 2020 to give local election workers more time before Election Day to process mailed ballots have died in Republican-controlled legislatures.

Instead, Republicans in those states have sought to tighten restrictions on voting by mail — provisions vetoed by Democratic governors.

"Counting the ballots should be driven by security, not speed," Wisconsin state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, a Republican, said earlier this year as lawmakers were considering legislation on the issue. "Why would we want to give bad actors the chance to see ballots prior to Election Day?"

Republicans helped kill a bipartisan bill that would have allowed more time for processing mailed ballots in Wisconsin amid claims that it would give partisans more time to cheat or leak vote counts early.

Like Pennsylvania, election workers in Michigan and Wisconsin must wait until Election Day to start the pre-canvassing of mailed ballots.

For now, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, requests for absentee ballots are running below 2020's rate, relieving some of the burden on local election offices.

Still, Claire Woodall-Vogg, executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, said it's "a total guess" when counting will finish in Wisconsin's most populous county. She hopes it will wrap up by 11 p.m. on election night. A late rush of dropped-off ballots — as happened in 2020 — isn't expected this year, she said, because courts banned the use of drop boxes.

In Michigan in 2020, lawmakers agreed to give clerks in more populous cities and towns 10 hours on the day before Election Day to process mailed ballots. Clerks unsuccessfully sought a similar provision for this year. The Michigan Secretary of State's office said it was too early to estimate how many absentee ballots might be cast or how long it will take to process them.

Original Article

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants ‘October Surprise’

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants 'October Surprise' (Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Jeremy Frankel | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:38 PM EDT

Lawyers for former President Trump and for the DOJ held a hearing for the first time Tuesday with Special Master Raymond Dearie, who was appointed to conduct an independent review of records taken by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago last month. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, joined Newsmax to break down the hearing’s details.

Appearing on “Rob Schmitt Tonight” on Tuesday, Habba told host Rob Schmitt that the hope for a special master was that the special master would mediate the issue of which documents are considered personal records, which is governed by the Presidential Records Act. The DOJ conducted the raid, in Habba’s opinion, because the November midterms are coming and they wanted an “October surprise.” However, Dearie said he did not want to do look at the classified documents, which, according to Habba, was the whole purpose of the special master.

However, Habba praised U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who had appointed Dearie as Special Master, for giving a Nov. 30 deadline for Dearie to complete his work, saying that “that’s a problem if you're politicizing an agenda, because the November midterms will come and go, and they will not get done what they want to do, which is basically trying to take down Donald Trump. That's my opinion. But it is what it is, and that's why they're pushing, they’re appealing.”

The DOJ is currently appealing to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Cannon’s ruling and allow them to continue reviewing the documents they seized, even as the special master is reviewing them.

“They're panicking,” Habba added. “This is what happens. This is not what the DOJ is supposed to do. This is not what the FBI is supposed to do. But that is what I think is happening,” Habba continued.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants ‘October Surprise’

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants 'October Surprise' (Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Jeremy Frankel | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:38 PM EDT

Lawyers for former President Trump and for the DOJ held a hearing for the first time Tuesday with Special Master Raymond Dearie, who was appointed to conduct an independent review of records taken by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago last month. Trump's lawyer, Alina Habba, joined Newsmax to break down the hearing's details.

Appearing on "Rob Schmitt Tonight" on Tuesday, Habba told host Rob Schmitt that the hope for a special master was that the special master would mediate the issue of which documents are considered personal records, which is governed by the Presidential Records Act. The DOJ conducted the raid, in Habba's opinion, because the November midterms are coming and they wanted an "October surprise." However, Dearie said he did not want to look at the classified documents, which, according to Habba, was the whole purpose of the special master.

However, Habba praised U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who had appointed Dearie as Special Master, for giving a Nov. 30 deadline for Dearie to complete his work, saying that "that's a problem if you're politicizing an agenda, because the November midterms will come and go, and they will not get done what they want to do, which is basically trying to take down Donald Trump. That's my opinion. But it is what it is, and that's why they're pushing, they're appealing."

The DOJ is currently appealing to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Cannon's ruling and allow them to continue reviewing the documents they seized, even as the special master is reviewing them.

"They're panicking," Habba added. "This is what happens. This is not what the DOJ is supposed to do. This is not what the FBI is supposed to do. But that is what I think is happening," Habba continued.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill

House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill

Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., vice chairwoman of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

By Nick Koutsobinas | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:25 PM EDT

The House on Wednesday will vote on a bill introduced by two members of the Jan. 6 panel, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., and Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., on Monday designed to prevent election interference.

According to The Hill, the legislation, the Presidential Election Reform Act, would reform the long-standing Electoral Count Act of 1887. The measure would clarify that the vice president's role in certifying the election is purely ministerial and "would require one-third of lawmakers in each chamber to back any effort to object to electors."

"I want to make absolutely clear at the outset that what we saw happen in 2020, what Donald Trump tried to convince the vice president to do, was illegal under existing law, and we begin by affirming that," Cheney told reporters Tuesday. "But we need to then take steps to make sure that another Jan. 6 is something that never happens again."

While similar legislation has been introduced by a bipartisan collective of legislators in the Senate, the House bill would include other proactive measures, including limitations on extending elections.

The legislation is seeing pushback among Republicans, however.

"If you look at the bill," House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., said, "it's got some components, like it allows more lawsuits to drag out elections, to allow trial lawyers to change states' election laws that were debated in their legislatures, which goes against the democratic principles that even the Constitution lays out for how elections should work."

After Scalise's statement, which he offered to reporters on Tuesday, his office began pressing other Republican lawmakers to vote along party lines. In a memo to House GOP offices, Scalise's office wrote that the "flawed" legislation "tramples on State sovereignty and opens the door for destructive private rights of action that will only delay results and inject more uncertainty into our elections."

The measure also outlines constitutional justifications for objecting to electoral votes,

But the bill's sponsors say the Presidential Election Reform Act will clarify that legislators can raise objections to electoral votes only for a narrow set of issues.

In addition, the bill outlines that candidates can obtain a federal court order if a governor fails to transmit the electors' votes to Congress and asserts that presidential elections can be extended if and only if a federal judge rules that the state has undergone a genuine "catastrophic event" otherwise changing the outcome of the race.

Still, other Republicans say they oppose the bill because it was "rushed" into the House.

"The proposal before us has been rushed through in a highly partisan manner," Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., ranking member of the House Administration Committee, said Tuesday at a House Rules Committee meeting.

"Why rush such a significant piece of legislation when the next presidential certification won't happen for over two years?" Davis questioned. "It's simple: The midterm elections are just weeks away, and Democrats and the [Jan. 6] committee are desperately trying to talk about their favorite topic, and that is former President Trump."

When Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, was asked about the GOP's push against the bill, he replied, "that's sad."

"If they saw what happened on Jan. 6," Thompson added, "then it's obvious this is not who we are as a country, and so much of it was put forth under the assumption that somehow the vice president could stop the will of the people. And so this legislation just stops that absolutely in its tracks. So I wouldn't see a responsible member of this body not wanting to make sure that something like Jan. 6 never happened again."

The sponsored bill by Lofgren and Cheney comes as the Senate has moved more earnestly on a similar proposal introduced in July that would also tweak the Electoral Count Act. But the key difference is the Senate version is that it would require just a one-fifth vote of support to back objections to electors. The Senate version already has the support of 10 Republicans.

Thompson told reporters Tuesday he thinks the Senate version will garner more support because it was introduced first.

"Ours," he said, "for all intents and purposes, just hit this week, and I think once people get an opportunity to see what our bill encompasses versus the Senate bill, I think you'll see people moving to our side."

Still, the Lofgren-Cheney bill holds one more difference than the Senate bill. It outlines requirements for seeking to declare an election failed, something Cheney says would block possible future abuse by those looking to extend an election.

"We wanted to be very clear and specific about the definition of catastrophic event and wanted to make sure that in the future you couldn't have a situation, for example, where false claims of fraud could be made to allow a state to refuse to certify valid votes," Cheney said.

"We thought it was very important to be clear about both what constituted a catastrophic event, what the impact of such a thing would be, and, yes, to help ensure that we're preventing misuse and abuse of those kinds of claims in future elections," she added.

Original Article

House GOP Leader: Don’t Fund Govt if Dems Don’t Fund Border

House GOP Leader: Don't Fund Govt if Dems Don't Fund Border (Newsmax)

By Eric Mack | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:44 PM EDT

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is telling his Republican colleagues to vote against a continuing resolution to fund the government unless Democrats and President Joe Biden pony up to secure the southern border.

"President Biden is asking for a government funding bill that simply kicks the can to an unaccountable lame-duck Congress that does nothing to actually address the nation's problems – especially the crisis at our southern border," McCarthy wrote Tuesday in a statement posted to Twitter. "Under Biden and Pelosi there have been more than 3.5 million illegal border crossings – more than the entire population of Chicago.

"Democrats' open border policies have led to an unprecedented crisis, and they have no plan to secure the border.

"If Biden & Democrats don't use this government funding bill to address the border crisis immediately, I'm voting NO on this bill and I urge my colleagues to do the same."

The fiscal year ends Oct. 1 and passing a budget in Congress has proved difficult in recent years. The continuing resolution (C.R.) maintains last year's spending limits and keeps the government running, but there have been government shutdowns in the past when partisan divides refuse to pass a new C.R.

The talks for funding the government currently center around passing a temporary C.R. until after the midterm elections, when Congress can address the appropriations again in December.

Former President Donald Trump has blasted Republicans, namely Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for not using a government shutdown as leverage in talks for a new agreement on appropriations.

The border crisis has bubbled to the forefront of the midterm election cycle as Republicans have sought to pin down Biden and Democrats on their open border and sanctuary city policies.

Original Article

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office Couy Griffin looks on (AP)

MORGAN LEE Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:34 PM EDT

A New Mexico politician and Trump supporter who was removed and barred from elected office for his role in the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is attempting to appeal that decision to the state Supreme Court.

Cowboys for Trump co-founder and former county commissioner Couy Griffin on Tuesday notified the high court of his intent to appeal.

The ruling against Griffin this month from a Santa Fe-based District Court was the first to remove or bar an elected official from office in connection with the attack on the U.S. Capitol building that disrupted Congress as it was trying to certify President Joe Biden's 2020 electoral victory.

Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin has invoked free speech guarantees in his defense and says his banishment from public office disenfranchises his political constituents in Otero County.

He was barred from office under provisions of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which holds that anyone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution can be barred from office for engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The provisions were put in place shortly after the Civil War.

A flurry of similar lawsuits around the country are seeking to use the provision to punish politicians who took part in Jan. 6.

Griffin says he continues to act as his own legal counsel in the case.

"Honestly, I have felt very abandoned by many," Griffin said.

Conservative activists aligned with Griffin have urged supporters to file disciplinary complaints against the judge who barred Griffin from office.

Griffin, a 48-year-old former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found Cowboys for Trump in 2019. The promotional group staged horseback parades to spread President Donald Trump's conservative message about gun rights, immigration controls, and abortion restrictions.

This year, Griffin voted twice as a county commissioner against certifying New Mexico's June 7 primary election, in a standoff over election integrity fueled by allegations about the security of voting equipment in the Republican-dominated county.

Original Article

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office (AP)

MORGAN LEE Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:34 PM EDT

A New Mexico politician and Trump supporter who was removed and barred from elected office for his role in the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is attempting to appeal that decision to the state Supreme Court.

Cowboys for Trump co-founder and former county commissioner Couy Griffin on Tuesday notified the high court of his intent to appeal.

The ruling against Griffin this month from a Santa Fe-based District Court was the first to remove or bar an elected official from office in connection with the attack on the U.S. Capitol building that disrupted Congress as it was trying to certify President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin has invoked free speech guarantees in his defense and says his banishment from public office disenfranchises his political constituents in Otero County.

He was barred from office under provisions of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which holds that anyone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution can be barred from office for engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The provisions were put in place shortly after the Civil War.

A flurry of similar lawsuits around the country are seeking to use the provision to punish politicians who took part in Jan. 6.

Griffin says he continues to act as his own legal counsel in the case.

“Honestly I have felt very abandoned by many,” Griffin said.

Conservative activists aligned with Griffin have urged supporters to file disciplinary complaints against the judge who barred Griffin from office.

Griffin, a 48-year-old former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found Cowboys for Trump in 2019. The promotional group staged horseback parades to spread President Donald Trump’s conservative message about gun rights, immigration controls and abortion restrictions.

This year, Griffin voted twice as a county commissioner against certifying New Mexico’s June 7 primary election, in a standoff over election integrity fueled by allegations about the security of voting equipment in the Republican-dominated county.

Original Article

Rep. Roy to Newsmax: Southern Border Crisis A ‘Political Game for Democrats’

Rep. Roy to Newsmax: Southern Border Crisis A 'Political Game for Democrats' (Newsmax/"Spicer & Co.")

By Jay Clemons | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 07:07 PM EDT

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, didn't see the humor in President Joe Biden's remarks from Tuesday, quipping that Delaware "has a beautiful shoreline," when asked if Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was planning to send illegal immigrants to the president's home state.

Biden's response was a "perfect example of how [immigration] is a political game for Democrats," and migrants are "dying as a result," Roy told Newsmax Tuesday evening, while appearing on "Spicer & Co." with host Sean Spicer.

When Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Florida's DeSantis shipped approximately 50 migrants to the Massachusetts beach community of Martha's Vineyard last week, Roy reasons it brought attention to the every-day chaos along the United States-Mexico border.

From Roy's perspective, the Republican governors "exposed the hypocrisy" of the Democrat-controlled cities and states which previously trumpeted its "sanctuary" status, only to have Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker call in the National Guard to remove the migrants from Martha's Vineyard after less than 48 hours.

Abbott and DeSantis made the immigration issue "front and center" nationally, says Roy.

However, instead of Democrats heeding that lesson, Roy says their main takeaway from the Martha's Vineyard incident was, 'Hey, we made [the migrants] some sandwiches. Now, let's get 'em off the island.'

Overall, Roy says the Martha's Vineyard episode put a public face on the Democrats' indifference toward southern border issues.

"Some little girl is getting raped [along the border] right now, because of this administration," says Roy, who oversees Texas' 21st Congressional District, covering a large swath of land between Austin and San Antonio.

The Texas Republican also took exception to his GOP colleagues Tuesday, for letting Democrats and the Biden administration get away with "reckless" border policies, primarily providing opposition that amounts to "lip service."

"[The Biden administration is] using exceptions to swallow the whole of border security," says Roy, while alleging illegal immigrants aren't even claiming asylum anymore at the border, since they've been told border officials will largely stand down on conducting extensive captures and seizures.

"The American people demand we stop this," says Roy, while pledging substantial investigative oversight changes next year, if Republicans take over the House chamber in the upcoming midterm elections (Nov. 8).

"[Democrats] are purposely lying about the border. … These are impeachable acts," says Roy.

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

GOP’s Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate

GOP's Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate GOP's Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate Migrants, who boarded a bus in Texas, listen to volunteers offering assistance after being dropped off within view of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington last month. (Getty)

STEVE PEOPLES, ADRIANA GOMEZ LICON and PAUL WEBER Tuesday, 20 September 2022 05:53 PM EDT

They’ve delivered migrants on planes and buses to Washington, D.C., New York City — even Martha’s Vineyard. And the Republican governors of Florida and Texas may be just getting started.

Govs. Ron DeSantis of Florida and Greg Abbott of Texas insist such dramatic steps are need to highlight a genuine crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, where thousands of migrants stream into the country illegally each day. But weeks away from their own competitive reelections, friends and foes alike acknowledged that such hard-line tactics have effectively refocused November’s midterm elections — at least, temporarily — away from abortion rights and toward an issue more favorable to Republicans.

A defiant DeSantis on Tuesday blasted the Biden administration's inaction on the Southern border and celebrated his own policies for making illegal immigration “a front-burner issue” ahead of the midterms.

“It will be a big issue in the elections, I can tell you that,” DeSantis said. “It’s already made more of an impact than anyone thought it could possibly make. But we’re going to continue to make more of an impact.”

Indeed, DeSantis and Abbott are pressing forward with — and even expanding on — controversial campaigns to ship thousands of immigrants from Texas to Democratic-led states and cities. Beyond shifting the national debate, their divisive moves could also serve to strengthen their national brands — and help legitimize their controversial policies — as they consider 2024 presidential bids.

“I personally thought it was a good idea," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday.

The governors' rhetoric is reminiscent of former President Donald Trump’s dire warnings ahead of the 2018 midterms that a migrant caravan threatened the Southern border. Trump’s GOP lost 40 seats in the House and gained two Senate seats that year.

Democrats from Connecticut to California have generated momentum in recent weeks by campaigning on the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade — and the GOP's subsequent push to outlaw abortion in dozens of states. Republicans, meanwhile, want to make the midterms a referendum on President Joe Biden and concerns about the economy, crime and immigration.

This week, at least, immigration is leading the national debate.

“What they’re doing is raising the salience and relevance of the immigration issue, which is important to Republican voters and can help drive turnout,” said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse. “For the voters we’re appealing to, for the most part, the benefits outweigh the risks by a considerable margin.”

There are real risks, however, particularly for DeSantis, who has taken credit for two weekend charter planes that carried about 50 migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard, a small, wealthy island off Massachusetts' coast. The immigrants were told they were going to Boston.

A Texas sheriff on Monday opened an investigation into DeSantis' flights, though the law enforcement official, an elected Democrat, did not say what laws may have been broken in putting 48 Venezuelans on private planes from San Antonio, the first stop for many migrants who cross the border.

Rep. Joaquin Castro, a Democrat who represents San Antonio, has called on the Justice Department to investigate the flights as well.

“These guys are immature, sadistic Trump imitators. That’s what they are,” Castro said of Abbott and DeSantis. “This is sadistic behavior. Whatever political point they were trying to make has been made a long time ago.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is viewed by many as a future Democratic presidential candidate, called DeSantis “a disgrace” for using taxpayer money to transport immigrants to other states. Over the summer, Newsom paid for campaign ads in Texas and Florida critical of the governors.

DeSantis, who has stepped up travel on behalf of GOP candidates in the midterm elections, vowed to spend “every penny” of $12 million set aside by the state legislature for such “relocation programs.” On Tuesday, local officials in a Delaware community close to Biden's vacation home were preparing to receive another one of DeSantis' planes full of migrants from Texas, although the Florida governor refused to confirm the development.

Despite fierce criticism and potential legal liabilities, there has been little evidence of widespread political backlash in either state.

Democratic sympathizers in Florida staged news conferences in recent days condemning the governors while others compared DeSantis to late Cuban leader Fidel Castro on Spanish radio. But the number of Venezuelan voters in the state remains relatively small. Much of the community that exists has formed a coalition with Cubans, a crucial bloc in Florida that has increasingly voted Republican.

“Governors Abbott and DeSantis have had enough of it and decided to do something for people to pay attention,” said Ernesto Ackerman, a Republican who heads the Independent Venezuelan American Citizens. “This is a country of laws, not of scoundrels and tramps.”

In Texas, Abbott has spent the past two years pushing a series of provocative immigration measures that have elevated his national profile and kept critics on his right at bay. The two-term governor converted a former prison near Texas’ southern border into a jail for migrants, gave the National Guard extraordinary arrest powers and gridlocked some of America’s busiest ports for a week by mandating additional inspections for 18-wheelers crossing into the U.S.

The Abbott administration has been busing migrants to Washington, Chicago and New York City for months. The busing campaign includes two busloads of people who were dropped off outside Vice President Kamala Harris' residence last weekend.

Longtime Abbott adviser Dave Carney said Texas would expand its operation this week to include new drop-off locations in other states.

“We’ve been focused on this for two years. It’s got nothing to do with politics. The communities are screaming bloody murder,” Carney said, referring to border towns flooded with immigrants apprehended at the border and subsequently released.

Republicans cast the border crisis as a failure of the Biden administration.

The federal government this week reported that authorities stopped migrants 2.15 million times from October through August, the first time that measure has ever topped 2 million and a 39% increase from the same period a year earlier.

Border crossings have been fueled partly by repeat crossers because there are no legal consequences for getting caught under a pandemic-era rule that denies a right to seek asylum. Even so, the numbers are extraordinarily high.

While Abbott and DeSantis have also highlighted their accomplishments on issues related to the economy, neither has taken steps to moderate their immigration policies as the November election nears.

Abbott is running against former Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke, who has outraised Abbott in a contest that represents the toughest challenge of the governor’s political career.

Immigration remains a crucial issue for Democrats who have long believed Texas’ booming cities and shifting demographics would eventually turn America’s biggest red state blue. But in overwhelmingly Hispanic counties on the border, Republicans are making an aggressive play for three congressional seats this fall after Trump made major gains in the region in 2020.

It was much the same in South Florida, where Trump's GOP performed better than expected in the last election.

DeSantis is running against former Rep. Charlie Crist, whose campaign has charged in recent days that the governor “shot himself in the foot” by shipping immigrants from Texas to Massachusetts. The move sparked a fundraising surge for Crist that exceeded $1 million over a 48-hour period, according to spokesperson Samantha Ramirez.

Republican candidates on the November ballot don't seem worried.

“I think it is a valid maneuver to use in order to try to wake up or at least expose the hypocrisy of progressive Democrats that say the border is secure and there’s no problem down here whatsoever,” said Joseph Swiger, one of dozens of Republicans running for local office in Texas border counties where the GOP seldom bothered to recruit candidates in the past.

Original Article

Arbiter in Trump Docs Probe Signals Intent to Move Quickly

Arbiter in Trump Docs Probe Signals Intent to Move Quickly Arbiter in Trump Docs Probe Signals Intent to Move Quickly (AP)

ERIC TUCKER and MICHAEL R. SISAK Tuesday, 20 September 2022 04:27 PM EDT

The independent arbiter tasked with inspecting documents seized in an FBI search of former President Donald Trump's Florida home said Tuesday he intends to push briskly though the review process and appeared skeptical of the Trump team's reluctance to say whether it believed the records had been declassified.

“We're going to proceed with what I call responsible dispatch," Raymond Dearie, a veteran Brooklyn judge, told lawyers for Trump and the Justice Department in their first meeting since his appointment last week as a so-called special master.

The purpose of the meeting was to sort out next steps in a review process expected to slow by weeks, if not months, the criminal investigation into the retention of top-secret information at Mar-a-Lago after Trump left the White House. As special master, Dearie will be responsible for sifting through the thousands of documents recovered during the Aug. 8 FBI search and segregating those protected by claims of executive privilege or attorney-client privilege.

Though Trump's lawyers had requested the appointment of a special master to ensure an independent review of the documents, one of the former president's attorneys, James Trusty, made clear they were concerned that Dearie's proposed deadlines were too ambitious.

The lawyers are also resisting Dearie's request for information about whether the seized records had been declassified, as Trump has maintained. In a letter to Dearie on Monday night, the lawyers said that issue could be part of Trump’s defense in the event of an indictment.

But Dearie appeared unsatisfied with that position. He said if Trump's lawyers will not actually assert that the records have been declassified and the Justice Department instead makes an acceptable case that they remain classified, then “as far as I'm concerned, that's the end of it.”

Trusty said the Trump team should not be forced at this point to disclose a possible defense based on the idea that the records had been declassified. He denied that the lawyers were trying to engage in “gamesmanship” but instead believed it was a process that required “baby steps.”

But Dearie at one point observed: “I guess my view of it is, you can’t have your cake and eat it” too.

Trump has maintained without evidence that all of the records were declassified; his lawyers have not echoed that claim, though they have repeatedly asserted that a president has absolute authority to declassify information, and they said in a separate filing Tuesday that the Justice Department had not proven that the records remained classified.

“As someone who has been president of the United States, he has unfettered access along with unfettered declassification authority,” Trusty said Tuesday.

The resistance to the judge’s request was notable because it was Trump’s lawyers, not the Justice Department, who had requested the appointment of a special master and because the recalcitrance included an acknowledgment that the probe could be building toward an indictment.

In the letter, Trump’s lawyers said the time for addressing that question would be if they pressed forward with demands for the Justice Department to return some of the property taken from Mar-a-Lago.

“Otherwise, the Special Master process will have forced the Plaintiff to fully and specifically disclose a defense to the merits of any subsequent indictment.” they wrote.

The Trump team also asked the judge to consider pushing back all of the deadlines for his review. That work includes inspecting the roughly 11,000 documents, including about 100 marked as classified, that were taken during the FBI's search.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee who granted the Trump team's request for a special master, had set a Nov. 30 deadline for Dearie's review and instructed him to prioritize his inspection of classified records. The Justice Department has asked a federal appeals court to halt Cannon's order requiring it to provide him with classified documents for his review. That appeal is pending.

Dearie, a Ronald Reagan appointee whose name is on the atrium of his Brooklyn courthouse, made clear during Tuesday's meeting that he intended to meet the deadlines, saying there was “little time” to complete the assigned tasks.

Julie Edelstein, a Justice Department lawyer, said she was hopeful that the department could get the documents digitized and provided to Trump's lawyers by early next week. She noted that the department had given the legal team a list of five vendors approved by the government for the purposes of scanning, hosting and otherwise processing the seized records.

After some haggling, Dearie instructed Trusty's lawyers to choose a vendor by Friday.

Earlier Tuesday, the Trump legal team urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit to leave in place Cannon's order temporarily barring the Justice Department's use of the classified records for its criminal investigation while Dearie completes his review. The department has said that order has impeded its investigation into the presence of top-secret information at Mar-a-Lago.

Trump's lawyers called those concerns overblown, saying investigators could still do other work on the probe even without scrutinizing the seized records.

“Ultimately, any brief delay to the criminal investigation will not irreparably harm the Government,” Trump's lawyers wrote. “The injunction does not preclude the Government from conducting a criminal investigation, it merely delays the investigation for a short period while a neutral third party reviews the documents in question.”

Original Article

Report: McConnell Privately Optimistic GOP Will Take Senate

Report: McConnell Privately Optimistic GOP Will Take Senate Newsmax

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 03:58 PM EDT

Despite public comments made to the contrary, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is reportedly feeling good about Republicans' chances of taking the Senate in November.

Sources told Axios on Monday that the GOP leader from Kentucky expressed "cautious optimism in closed-door remarks" to the United States Chamber of Commerce about picking up the highest chamber in the midterm elections.

The change in messaging is a sharp contrast to McConnell's position expressed to the Northern Kentucky Chamber of Commerce during a luncheon last month, according to NBC News.

"I think there's probably a greater likelihood the House flips than the Senate. Senate races are just different — they're statewide, candidate quality has a lot to do with the outcome," McConnell said in Florence, Kentucky.

"Right now, we have a 50-50 Senate and a 50-50 country, but I think when all is said and done this fall, we're likely to have an extremely close Senate, either our side up slightly or their side up slightly."

Former President Donald Trump called out McConnell's statement at the time, asking Republican senators on Truth Social why they allow the leader "to openly disparage hard working Republican candidates for the United States Senate[?]"

That hard work appears to be producing results. Recently, there has been a shift in polling of competitive Senate races toward Republicans, specifically in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Ohio, and Georgia.

The Trafalgar Group's latest survey of the Pennsylvania Senate race showed Dr. Mehmet Oz closing the gap on state Lt. Gov. John Fetterman from a 5.3 percentage point margin to 1.8 points.

New polls of the Arizona Senate race by Trafalgar and Emerson College have capitalist and author Blake Masters trailing incumbent Sen. Mark Kelly by two points. Last month, a Fox News poll had Masters down eight.

Original Article

Ric Grenell to Newsmax: Biden Signals Weakness With UN Speech Delay

Ric Grenell to Newsmax: Biden Signals Weakness With UN Speech Delay (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 02:41 PM EDT

President Joe Biden's decision to speak on the second day of the United Nations General Assembly and not its first, using the excuse of traveling back from attending the funeral of Queen Elizabeth II on Monday, "signals weakness on the world stage," former U.S. Amb. Ric Grenell told Newsmax as the gathering of world leaders was beginning Tuesday.

"Biden cannot get himself physically together to get up here to make his typical speech time, and the White House will spin on that and say, 'oh, you know, we're, you know, meeting some other time,'" Grenell, now a senior national security analyst for Newsmax, told "Wake Up America."

"The tradition is that Brazil speaks first, followed by the host country, which is the United States."

This means the president is to speak second, on the first day of the General Assembly, but "Joe Biden is not doing that because he needs to get rested up," Grenell said.

It is not only unprecedented, but that means that Biden will be speaking within a day of Iran's President Ebrahim Raisi, who said this week he has no plans to meet with Biden or any other U.S. leaders on the sidelines of the event, even though negotiations over reviving the Iran nuclear deal remain on hold.

Raisi, though, said his appearance at the U.N. is an opportunity to talk to the world about the "malice" that other nations, which he did not name, have toward his country. He will address the General Assembly and a UNESCO meeting about religions.

Grenell said the leaders' speeches are "very big for their hometown audiences, their home country audiences."

He also talked about Trump's speech to the United Nations four years ago, when Germany leaders "mocked" him for his warnings about the nation's dependence on Russian oil and gas.

"What I found most fascinating about when that happened in 2018 is the fact that we were four years removed from the invasion in Crimea in 2014," said Grenell, who served under Trump. "We knew that Vladimir Putin had plans to try and take the rest of Ukraine, if possible when the moment was right, and that moment was Feb. 24, 2022."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Trump Responds to DOJ’s Special Master Appeal

Trump Responds to DOJ's Special Master Appeal Former President Donald Trump (Getty Images)

By Charlie McCarthy | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 02:22 PM EDT

Lawyers for former President Donald Trump urged a federal appeals court to reject the Justice Department's request for a partial stay of a ruling that effectively has paused the government's probe into the alleged mishandling of classified documents.

The DOJ filed a motion Friday with the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for a partial stay of U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's order requiring a special master to review items with classification markings seized at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida last month.

Trump’s attorneys, in a Tuesday filing, asked the court to uphold Cannon's Thursday order denying the government's original motion for partial stay, which would leave in place the injunction preventing the government from reviewing and using the documents marked as classified in its ongoing criminal investigation.

The lawyers say the DOJ's investigation into Trump is "both unprecedented and misguided" and merely "a document storage dispute that has spiraled out of control," ABC News reported.

"The District Court did not err in temporarily enjoining the Government's review and use of records bearing classification markings for criminal investigative purposes because the merits support that narrowly tailored injunction," Trump's lawyers argue in the new filing.

Cannon, appointed by Trump in 2020, on Sept. 5 authorized the appointment of a special master (arbiter) to review personal items, documents and material subject to claims of attorney-client privilege.

Three days later, the DOJ appealed the judge’s decision to name a special master claiming it harmed national security.

On Thursday, Cannon selected one of Trump special master nominees, but ruled that the former president Trump will pay associated costs.

The judge also detailed the steps the DOJ can take to further its investigation while the documents remain sequestered, including "questioning witnesses and obtaining other information about the movement and storage of seized materials, including documents marked as classified, without discussion of their contents."

Also Tuesday, attorneys for Trump opposed a move by special master Raymond Dearie to immediately share declassification details of the documents seized by the FBI.

Axios said a letter by the Trump legal team to Dearie noted a draft plan they say "requires that the Plaintiff disclose specific information regarding declassification to the court and to the government."

Original Article

Mark Morgan to Newsmax: ‘Preposterous’ to Blame Border on Trump

Mark Morgan to Newsmax: 'Preposterous' to Blame Border on Trump (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 01:42 PM EDT

It is "absolutely preposterous" the Biden administration is blaming former President Donald Trump for the border situation, because, "like so many other actions from this administration, they've overplayed their hands," Mark Morgan, the former acting Customs and Border Patrol Commissioner, told Newsmax on Tuesday.

"The current commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, it's unbelievable he's actually using and made up a new term called unique individuals," Morgan told "Wake Up America." "That's a D.C. swamp term for recidivism. We've had recidivism, meaning the same illegal alien tries multiple entries, since 1925 when we started keeping statistics. This is a radical attempt to try to divert attention from the disaster at the southwest border by once again lying to the Americans."

Last week, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters the White House has been "doing is doing the work that wasn't done by the last administration. We are fixing a broken system. It is not like turning the light switch on; it is going to take some time."

Meanwhile, Morgan pointed out, millions of people have been coming across the border in the past 19 months since President Joe Biden took office, but now that immigrants are being sent to sanctuary cities, it has become a crisis for Democrats.

"When I look at sanctuary cities like New York, D.C., and Chicago, who by their very own accord, by their support of sanctuary cities have acted as a beacon for illegal aliens," said Morgan, adding, Martha's Vineyard had less than 50 arrive "and all of a sudden, it's a full-blown crisis."

"They used the National Guard to remove them from the rich enclave, but we know we have communities in the southwest border that are overrun," Morgan said. "They get 50 migrants every couple of minutes and they're so overwhelmed. There are no shelters. They don't have the resources. There are illegal aliens aligned in the streets, waiting to be picked up two brought to another state yet we never anything from this administration until 50 were received at Martha's Vineyard. It's just hypocrisy."

Meanwhile, reports indicate violent criminals are being released from prisons in Venezuela and now they are coming to the nation's border, and Morgan said this is a repeat of policies from the 1980s when migrants from Cuba were coming to the United States.

"What I'm really surprised about is that took the leadership of Venezuela this long to do it," he said. "We know that they hate this country, and so now this is a part of the overall strategy of Venezuela to empty out their problems and put them on the steps of the United States."

They are succeeding, he continued, because of the Biden administration's open border policies.

"The CBP has encountered over 30,000 criminals, including rapist murders, pedophiles, gang members," he said. "Many murderers, rapists, and pedophiles are coming in, and just the fact that high-powered Boston attorneys are now representing these people that broke the law by coming here illegally claiming that they were misled on a brochure when they flew from Florida to Martha's Vineyard is just laughable when you think about it.

"Two million people have crossed the southern border illegally, and we're so concerned about this suddenly because it affects Martha's Vineyard, the home of the Kennedys."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Mark Morgan to Newsmax: ‘Preposterous’ to Blame Border on Trump

Mark Morgan to Newsmax: 'Preposterous' to Blame Border on Trump (Newsmax/"Wake Up America")

By Sandy Fitzgerald | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 01:42 PM EDT

It is "absolutely preposterous" the Biden administration is blaming former President Donald Trump for the border situation, because, "like so many other actions from this administration, they've overplayed their hands," Mark Morgan, the former acting Customs and Border Patrol Commissioner, told Newsmax on Tuesday.

"The current commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, it's unbelievable he's actually using and made up a new term called unique individuals," Morgan told "Wake Up America." "That's a D.C. swamp term for recidivism. We've had recidivism, meaning the same illegal alien tries multiple entries, since 1925 when we started keeping statistics. This is a radical attempt to try to divert attention from the disaster at the southwest border by once again lying to the Americans."

Last week, press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters the White House has been "doing is doing the work that wasn't done by the last administration. We are fixing a broken system. It is not like turning the light switch on; it is going to take some time."

Meanwhile, Morgan pointed out, millions of people have been coming across the border in the past 19 months since President Joe Biden took office, but now that immigrants are being sent to sanctuary cities, it has become a crisis for Democrats.

"When I look at sanctuary cities like New York, D.C., and Chicago, who by their very own accord, by their support of sanctuary cities have acted as a beacon for illegal aliens," said Morgan, adding, Martha's Vineyard had less than 50 arrive "and all of a sudden, it's a full-blown crisis."

"They used the National Guard to remove them from the rich enclave, but we know we have communities in the southwest border that are overrun," Morgan said. "They get 50 migrants every couple of minutes and they're so overwhelmed. There are no shelters. They don't have the resources. There are illegal aliens aligned in the streets, waiting to be picked up two brought to another state yet we never anything from this administration until 50 were received at Martha's Vineyard. It's just hypocrisy."

Meanwhile, reports indicate violent criminals are being released from prisons in Venezuela and now they are coming to the nation's border, and Morgan said this is a repeat of policies from the 1980s when migrants from Cuba were coming to the United States.

"What I'm really surprised about is that took the leadership of Venezuela this long to do it," he said. "We know that they hate this country, and so now this is a part of the overall strategy of Venezuela to empty out their problems and put them on the steps of the United States."

They are succeeding, he continued, because of the Biden administration's open border policies.

"The CBP has encountered over 30,000 criminals, including rapist murders, pedophiles, gang members," he said. "Many murderers, rapists, and pedophiles are coming in, and just the fact that high-powered Boston attorneys are now representing these people that broke the law by coming here illegally claiming that they were misled on a brochure when they flew from Florida to Martha's Vineyard is just laughable when you think about it.

"Two million people have crossed the southern border illegally, and we're so concerned about this suddenly because it affects Martha's Vineyard, the home of the Kennedys."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!