Biden: Russia ‘Shamelessly Violated’ UN Charter in Ukraine

Biden: Russia 'Shamelessly Violated' UN Charter in Ukraine (Newsmax)

AAMER MADHANI Wednesday, 21 September 2022 12:43 PM EDT

President Joe Biden declared at the United Nations Wednesday that Russia has "shamelessly violated the core tenets" of the U.N with its "brutal, needless war" in Ukraine. He said the war is an affront to the heart of what the international body stands for as he looked to rally allies to stand firm in backing the Ukrainian resistance.

Delivering a forceful condemnation of Russia's seven-month invasion, Biden said reports of Russian abuses against civilians in Ukraine "should make your blood run cold." And he said President Vladimir Putin's new nuclear threats against Europe showed "reckless disregard" for Russia's responsibilities as a signer of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

He criticized Russia for scheduling "sham referenda" this week in territory it has forcibly seized in Ukraine.

"A permanent member of the U..N Security Council invaded its neighbor, attempted to erase a sovereign state from the map. Russia has shamelessly violated the core tenets of the U.N. charter," he told his U.N. audience.

Biden called on all nations, whether democracies or autocracies, to speak out against Russia's invasion and to bolster's Ukraine effort to defend itself.

"We will stand in solidarity against Russia's aggression, period," Biden said.

Biden also highlighted consequences of the invasion for the world's food supply, pledging $2.9 billion in global food security aid to address shortages caused by the war and the effects of climate change. He praised a U.N.-brokered effort to create a corridor for Ukrainian grain to be exported by sea, and called on the agreement to be continued despite the ongoing conflict.

Biden, during his time at the U.N. General Assembly, also planned to meet Wednesday with new British Prime Minister Liz Truss and press allies to meet an $18 billion target to replenish the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.

But the heart of the president's visit to the U.N. this year was his full-throated censure of Russia as its war nears the seven-month mark.

The address came as Russian-controlled regions of eastern and southern Ukraine have announced plans to hold Kremlin-backed referendums in days ahead on becoming part of Russia and as Moscow is losing ground in the invasion. Russian President Putin on Wednesday announced a partial mobilization to call up 300,000 reservists and accused the West of engaging in "nuclear blackmail."

The White House said the global food security funding includes $2 billion in direct humanitarian assistance through the United States Agency for International Development. The balance of the money will go to global development projects meant to boost the efficiency and resilience of the global food supply.

"This new announcement of $2.9 billion will save lives through emergency interventions and invest in medium- to long-term food security assistance in order to protect the world's most vulnerable populations from the escalating global food security crisis," the White House said.

Biden was confronting no shortage of difficult issues as leaders gather this year.

In addition to the Russian war in Ukraine, European fears that a recession could be just around the corner are heightened. Administration concerns grow by the day that time is running short to revive the Iran nuclear deal and over China's saber-rattling on Taiwan.

When he addressed last year's General Assembly, Biden focused on broad themes of global partnership, urging world leaders to act with haste against the coronavirus, climate change and human rights abuses. And he offered assurances that his presidency marked a return of American leadership to international institutions following Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy.

But one year later, global dynamics have dramatically changed.

Stewart Patrick, senior fellow and director of the Global Order and Institutions Program at the Washington think tank Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote in an analysis that Biden's task this year is "immense" compared to his first address to the U.N. as president.

"Last year, the U.S. leader won easy plaudits as the ‘anti-Trump,' pledging that ‘America was back,'" Patrick said. "This year demands more. The liberal, rules-based international system is reeling, battered by Russian aggression, Chinese ambitions, authoritarian assaults, a halting pandemic recovery, quickening climate change, skepticism of the U.N.'s relevance, and gnawing doubts about American staying power."

Beyond diplomacy, the president is also doing some politicking. This year's gathering comes less than seven weeks before pivotal midterm elections in the United States. Shortly after arriving in Manhattan on Tuesday night, Biden spoke at a Democratic National Committee fundraiser for about 100 participants that raised nearly $2 million, and he's set to hold another fundraiser on Thursday before heading back to Washington.

His Wednesday address comes on the heels of Ukrainian forces retaking control of large stretches of territory near Kharkiv. But even as Ukrainian forces have racked up battlefield wins, much of Europe is feeling painful blowback from economic sanctions levied against Russia. A vast reduction in Russian oil and gas has led to a sharp jump in energy prices, skyrocketing inflation and growing risk of Europe slipping into a recession.

Biden's visit to the U.N. also comes as his administration's efforts to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal appears stalled.

The deal brokered by the Obama administration — and scrapped by Trump in 2018 — provided billions of dollars in sanctions relief in exchange for Iran's agreement to dismantle much of its nuclear program and open its facilities to extensive international inspection.

Sullivan said no breakthrough with Iran is expected during the General Assembly but Biden would make clear in his speech that a deal can still be done "if Iran is prepared to be serious about its obligations." He added that administration officials would be consulting with fellow signatories of the 2015 deal on the sidelines of this week's meetings.

This year's U.N. gathering is back to being a full-scale, in-person event after two years of curtailed activity due to the pandemic. In 2020, the in-person gathering was canceled and leaders instead delivered prerecorded speeches; last year was a mix of in-person and prerecorded speeches. Biden and first lady Jill Biden were set to host a leaders' reception on Wednesday evening.

China's President Xi Jinping opted not to attend this year's U.N. gathering, but his country's conduct and intentions will loom large during the leaders' talks.

Last month, the U.N. human rights office raised concerns about possible "crimes against humanity" in China's western region against Uyghurs and other largely Muslim ethnic groups. Beijing has vowed to suspend cooperation with the office and blasted what it described as a Western plot to undermine China's rise.

Meanwhile, China's government on Monday said Biden's statement in a CBS "60 Minutes" interview that American forces would defend Taiwan if Beijing tried to invade the self-ruled island was a violation of U.S. commitments on the matter, but it gave no indication of possible retaliation.

The White House said after the interview that there has been no change in U.S. policy on Taiwan, which China claims as its own. That policy says Washington wants to see Taiwan's status resolved peacefully but doesn't say whether U.S. forces might be sent in response to a Chinese attack.

Original Article

USA Today-Suffolk Poll: DeSantis Leads Trump Among Florida Voters

USA Today-Suffolk Poll: DeSantis Leads Trump Among Florida Voters (Newsmax)

By Peter Malbin | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 12:01 PM EDT

Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis leads former President Donald Trump in a hypothetical presidential primary for the state by eight points, according to a new poll.

The USA Today-Suffolk University poll released Wednesday revealed that 48% of Florida Republican voters surveyed support DeSantis in the hypothetical matchup, compared to 40% who support Trump.

In a switch, Trump led DeSantis in the January USA Today-Suffolk poll, by 47% to 40%, indicating that high-profile FBI and criminal investigations may be adversely affecting the former president in favor of rising-star DeSantis.

David Paleologos, the director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, told USA Today that DeSantis’ lead among Florida Republicans does not necessarily mean he would lead in other states, but it could point to a shift among certain GOP voters, The Hill reported.

"But it is one data point suggesting a shift in preferences from GOP voters away from Trump and toward DeSantis from Republicans who know both potential combatants quite well," he said.

Both politicians are considered to be running possibilities in 2024, although DeSantis says he is focused on running for reelection as Florida governor.

Nationally, Trump still leads DeSantis among Republicans. But DeSantis is popular among many Florida Republicans for his tough stance on illegal migrants, his pro-business COVID-19 policies, and conservative education platform.

The Florida poll found significant class differences among Republican voters, with Trump leading DeSantis by 53% to 36% among those making less than $50,000 per year. Among people earning $50,000 of more, DeSantis leads Trump, 55% to 33%.

College-educated voters favor DeSantis by 60% to 30%, while those who didn't attend college prefer Trump by 57% to 27%, in the USA Today poll.

Both candidates would defeat President Joe Biden in a hypothetical 2024 match-up. DeSantis leads Biden, 52% to 44%, while Trump leads Biden by 3 points in Florida, 47% to 44%, according to the poll.

The poll was conducted Sept. 15-18 among 500 likely Florida midterm election voters. The margin of error for all respondents is 4.4 points.

Original Article

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company (Newsmax)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 12:30 PM EDT

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced Wednesday the state was filing suit against former President Donald Trump, his company, and family members for fraud.

James, speaking at a late-morning press conference, said New York was suing Trump, Trump Organization officials, and three of the former president's adult children — Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric — seeking at least $250 million in penalties for allegedly widespread fraud involving false financial statements related to the company.

James, a Democrat who campaigned on suing Trump, said her suit followed a "comprehensive three-year investigation" involving "interviews with 65 witnesses and the review of millions of documents."

"We're filing a lawsuit against Donald Trump for violating the law as part of his efforts to generate profits for himself, his family, and his company," James said.

"The complaint demonstrates that Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself, and to cheat the system, thereby cheating all of us."

Donald Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, released a statement following James' announcement.

"Today's filing is neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the attorney general's political agenda. It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General's Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place," Habba said.

"We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the attorney general's meritless claims."

James claimed Trump's children, former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg and organization controller Jeffrey McConney assisted the former president in the alleged crimes.

The lawsuit alleges that from 2011-2021, Trump and the Trump Organization knowingly and intentionally created more than 200 false and misleading valuations of assets on his annual Statements of Financial Condition to defraud financial institutions.

"The Trump Organization repeatedly and persistently manipulated the value of assets to induce banks to lend money to the Trump organization on more favorable terms than would otherwise would have been available to the company to pay lower taxes, to satisfy continuing loan agreements, and to induce insurance companies to provide insurance coverage for higher limits and at lower premiums," James said.

The attorney general said she was seeking penalties that included the banning of Trump and his children from serving as an officer with any company licensed in New York, and preventing Trump and the Trump Organization from entering into any state commercial real estate acquisition and from applying for loans from a New York institution for five years.

The state also seeks disgorgement of all financial benefits obtained through the alleged fraudulent practices, estimated to total $250 million.

She added her office is forwarding alleged federal criminal violations to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the IRS.

Trump last month said he refused to answer questions during an appearance before James' civil investigation into his family's business practices, citing his constitutional right against self-incrimination.

The former president has accused James of conducting a "with hunt" against him.

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company New York Attorney General Letitia James (Getty Images)

Wednesday, 21 September 2022 11:42 AM EDT

New York’s attorney general sued former President Donald Trump and his company Wednesday, alleging business fraud involving some of their most prized assets, including properties in Manhattan, Chicago and Washington, D.C.

Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit, filed in state court in New York, is the culmination of the Democrat’s three-year civil investigation of Trump and the Trump Organization. Trump’s three eldest children, Donald Jr., Ivanka and Eric Trump, were also named as defendants, along with two longtime company executives, Allen Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney.

The lawsuit seeks to strike at the core of what made Trump famous, taking a blacklight to the image of wealth and opulence he’s embraced throughout his career — first as a real estate developer, then as a reality TV host on “The Apprentice” and “Celebrity Apprentice,” and later as president.

James, a Democrat, was to announce details of the lawsuit at a news conference on Wednesday. The case showed up on a court docket Wednesday morning.

James’ office has spent more than three years investigating fraudulent or misleading valuations for its properties on annual financial statements that were given to potential business partners, banks or tax officials.

The goal, the attorney general’s office has said, was to burnish Trump’s billionaire image and the value of his properties when doing so gave him an advantage, while playing down the value of assets at other times for tax purposes.

“Today’s filing is neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the Attorney General’s political agenda. It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General’s Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place. We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the Attorney General’s meritless claims," said Alina Habba, an attorney for Trump.

Original Article

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company New York Attorney General Letitia James (Getty Images)

Wednesday, 21 September 2022 11:42 AM EDT

New York’s attorney general sued former President Donald Trump and his company Wednesday, alleging business fraud involving some of their most prized assets, including properties in Manhattan, Chicago and Washington, D.C.

Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit, filed in state court in New York, is the culmination of the Democrat’s three-year civil investigation of Trump and the Trump Organization. Trump’s three eldest children, Donald Jr., Ivanka and Eric Trump, were also named as defendants, along with two longtime company executives, Allen Weisselberg and Jeffrey McConney.

The lawsuit seeks to strike at the core of what made Trump famous, taking a blacklight to the image of wealth and opulence he’s embraced throughout his career — first as a real estate developer, then as a reality TV host on “The Apprentice” and “Celebrity Apprentice,” and later as president.

James, a Democrat, was to announce details of the lawsuit at a news conference on Wednesday. The case showed up on a court docket Wednesday morning.

James’ office has spent more than three years investigating fraudulent or misleading valuations for its properties on annual financial statements that were given to potential business partners, banks or tax officials.

The goal, the attorney general’s office has said, was to burnish Trump’s billionaire image and the value of his properties when doing so gave him an advantage, while playing down the value of assets at other times for tax purposes.

“Today’s filing is neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the Attorney General’s political agenda. It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General’s Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place. We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the Attorney General’s meritless claims," said Alina Habba, an attorney for Trump.

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company

N.Y. Attorney General Files $250M Fraud Suit Against Trump, Children, Company (Newsmax)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 12:30 PM EDT

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced Wednesday the state was filing suit against former President Donald Trump, his company, and family members for fraud.

James, speaking at a late-morning press conference, said New York was suing Trump, Trump Organization officials, and three of the former president's adult children — Donald Jr., Ivanka, and Eric — seeking at least $250 million in penalties for allegedly widespread fraud involving false financial statements related to the company.

James, a Democrat who campaigned on suing Trump, said her suit followed a "comprehensive three-year investigation" involving "interviews with 65 witnesses and the review of millions of documents."

"We're filing a lawsuit against Donald Trump for violating the law as part of his efforts to generate profits for himself, his family, and his company," James said.

"The complaint demonstrates that Donald Trump falsely inflated his net worth by billions of dollars to unjustly enrich himself, and to cheat the system, thereby cheating all of us."

Donald Trump's attorney, Alina Habba, released a statement following James' announcement.

"Today's filing is neither focused on the facts nor the law — rather, it is solely focused on advancing the attorney general's political agenda. It is abundantly clear that the Attorney General's Office has exceeded its statutory authority by prying into transactions where absolutely no wrongdoing has taken place," Habba said.

"We are confident that our judicial system will not stand for this unchecked abuse of authority, and we look forward to defending our client against each and every one of the attorney general's meritless claims."

James claimed Trump's children, former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg and organization controller Jeffrey McConney assisted the former president in the alleged crimes.

The lawsuit alleges that from 2011-2021, Trump and the Trump Organization knowingly and intentionally created more than 200 false and misleading valuations of assets on his annual Statements of Financial Condition to defraud financial institutions.

"The Trump Organization repeatedly and persistently manipulated the value of assets to induce banks to lend money to the Trump organization on more favorable terms than would otherwise would have been available to the company to pay lower taxes, to satisfy continuing loan agreements, and to induce insurance companies to provide insurance coverage for higher limits and at lower premiums," James said.

The attorney general said she was seeking penalties that included the banning of Trump and his children from serving as an officer with any company licensed in New York, and preventing Trump and the Trump Organization from entering into any state commercial real estate acquisition and from applying for loans from a New York institution for five years.

The state also seeks disgorgement of all financial benefits obtained through the alleged fraudulent practices, estimated to total $250 million.

She added her office is forwarding alleged federal criminal violations to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and the IRS.

Trump last month said he refused to answer questions during an appearance before James' civil investigation into his family's business practices, citing his constitutional right against self-incrimination.

The former president has accused James of conducting a "with hunt" against him.

Original Article

Trump: Biden, Putin Have World on Brink of Nuclear World War

Trump: Biden, Putin Have World on Brink of Nuclear World War (Newsmax)

By Eric Mack | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 11:41 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump is blasting the Biden administration for not holding Russian President Vladimir Putin at bay, possibly putting the world on the brink of a nuclear World War III.

"President Putin of Russia is now threatening the use of nuclear weapons, saying 'it is not a bluff,'" Trump wrote Wednesday on Truth Social. "The Ukrainian conflict should never have happened, and would not have happened if I were President. But as I have made very clear for quite some time, this could now end up being World War III."

Trump's statement comes after Putin called for the first mobilization of reservists in Russia since World War II. Putin, in a seven-minute televised address to the nation, also warned the West he is not bluffing about using everything at his disposal to protect Russia — an apparent reference to his nuclear arsenal.

Putin has previously told the West not to back Russia against the wall and has rebuked NATO countries for supplying weapons to Ukraine.

Putin's address coincided with President Joe Biden's address to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on Wednesday, where Biden said Russia has "shamelessly violated the core tenets" of the U.N. charter with its "brutal, needless war" in Ukraine.

Delivering a forceful condemnation of Russia's invasion to the international body, Biden said reports of Russian abuses against civilians in Ukraine "should make your blood run cold." He also said Putin's new nuclear threats against Europe showed "reckless disregard" for his nation's responsibilities as a signatory of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

"We will stand in solidarity against Russia’s aggression; period," Biden told the UNGA.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Original Article

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems’ Immigration Hypocrisy ‘Knows No Bounds’

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems' Immigration Hypocrisy 'Knows No Bounds' rep. pat fallon speaking during a hearing Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas (Getty Images)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 09:11 AM EDT

Democrats' hypocrisy regarding immigration "knows no bounds," Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, told Newsmax.

Fallon, appearing on Wednesday's "Wake Up America," was asked about New York City Mayor Eric Adams threatening to sue Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over the busing of migrants from the southern border to the Big Apple.

"The hypocrisy knows no bounds," Fallon told host Alison Maloni. "You know what? If they [liberals] didn't have double standards they'd have no standards at all, quite frankly."

Another example of Democrats' hypocrisy concerns migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

"I have to laugh when liberals say sending 58 migrants to Martha's Vineyard is a humanitarian crisis," Fallon told Newsmax." "How about the millions that have been crossing in Texas."

Fallon was asked about Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser creating an Office of Migrant Services to assist migrants being bused to her city.

"How about securing the border? That would be something," Fallon told Maloni. "Let's look at the tale of the tape here. In April of this year, we had 234,000 illegal border crossings – that's 1,258% higher than the last April President Trump was in office. And then in May, it was 240,000, which was 930% higher than the last May that President Trump was in office. And from April to August, if you include known got-aways, we're talking about somewhere between 1.3 and 1.5 million illegal border crossings in five months.

"We had never seen a year where we had more 2 million encounters … we're already there. That could be, really, 3 or 4 million in the coming years … 5 million … this is unsustainable."

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000. That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"[Vice President] Kamala Harris has said that the border is secure. This is their definition of secure – 1.5 million over the last five months," Fallon told Newsmax. "Ten thousand pounds of fentanyl has been seized in this fiscal year which is enough to kill every American about seven or eight times over. That's their definition of 'secure.' A hundred and seven thousand Americans have died of opioid overdoses just last year.

"The border is wide open. It is porous and we need to recognize that fact so that we can correct it. Because it is not a crisis, it is a catastrophe."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems’ Immigration Hypocrisy ‘Knows No Bounds’

Rep. Fallon to Newsmax: Dems' Immigration Hypocrisy 'Knows No Bounds' rep. pat fallon speaking during a hearing Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas (Getty Images)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 09:58 AM EDT

Democrats' hypocrisy regarding immigration "knows no bounds," Rep. Pat Fallon, R-Texas, told Newsmax.

Fallon, appearing on Wednesday's "Wake Up America," was asked about New York City Mayor Eric Adams threatening to sue Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over the busing of migrants from the southern border to the Big Apple.

"The hypocrisy knows no bounds," Fallon told host Alison Maloni. "You know what? If they [liberals] didn't have double standards, they'd have no standards at all, quite frankly."

Another example of Democrats' hypocrisy concerns migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard in Massachusetts by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

"I have to laugh when liberals say sending 58 migrants to Martha's Vineyard is a humanitarian crisis," Fallon told Newsmax." "How about the millions that have been crossing in Texas."

Fallon was asked about Washington D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser creating an Office of Migrant Services to assist migrants being bused to her city.

"How about securing the border? That would be something," Fallon told Maloni. "Let's look at the tale of the tape here. In April of this year, we had 234,000 illegal border crossings – that's 1,258% higher than the last April President Trump was in office. And then in May, it was 240,000, which was 930% higher than the last May that President Trump was in office. And from April to August, if you include known got-aways, we're talking about somewhere between 1.3 and 1.5 million illegal border crossings in five months.

"We had never seen a year where we had more than 2 million encounters … we're already there. That could be, really, 3 or 4 million in the coming years … 5 million … this is unsustainable."

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000. That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"[Vice President] Kamala Harris has said that the border is secure. This is their definition of secure – 1.5 million over the last five months," Fallon told Newsmax. "Ten thousand pounds of fentanyl has been seized in this fiscal year which is enough to kill every American about seven or eight times over. That's their definition of 'secure.' A hundred and seven thousand Americans have died of opioid overdoses just last year.

"The border is wide open. It is porous, and we need to recognize that fact so that we can correct it. Because it is not a crisis, it is a catastrophe."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Trump: Wall, ‘Remain in Mexico’ Produced Strong Southern Border

Trump: Wall, 'Remain in Mexico' Produced Strong Southern Border (Newsmax)

By Charlie McCarthy | Wednesday, 21 September 2022 08:31 AM EDT

Former President Donald Trump reminded people that an all-time southern border crisis did not exist under his administration.

U.S. Customs and Border Patrols statistics this week show that authorities encountered 203,597 migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border in August — the sixth straight month of more than 200,000.

That meant the number of migrants reported along the southern border in fiscal year 2022 was an all-time high of more than 2 million.

"Remember, just two years ago we had the strongest and best Southern Border in U.S. history," Trump posted on Truth Social early Wednesday morning. "They weren't coming up and through because they knew that it was going to be very hard to come in, and stay in. That's the best Border policy of them all, by far. I built the Wall, and then added more. Remain in Mexico, we said. It all worked!!!"

Trump's Remain in Mexico policy — officially called Migrant Protection Protocols — forced migrants to remain south of the border to await their asylum hearing in U.S. immigration court. President Joe Biden ended that policy in August.

The Republican National Committee, citing the Biden administration's "dereliction of duty" at the border, has made a call for midterm voters to remember the border — and their families' safety.

"Because of Biden and Democrats' dereliction of duty and open border policies, gangs are thriving, drugs are pouring into our neighborhoods, and our communities are less safe," RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel wrote in a statement Monday. "This November, Biden's border crisis will be top of mind as voters worry about the safety and security of loved ones."

Biden said Tuesday that it's "not rational" to send immigrants who illegally crossed the border back to countries such as Cuba, Nicaragua, or Venezuela.

Approximately 5 million migrants have crossed the southern border since the Biden administration took over the White House in January 2021.

Republican Govs. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., Greg Abbott, R-Texas, and Doug Ducey, R-Ariz., have transported migrants to blue jurisdictions in protest of Biden's unwillingness to sufficiently police the southern border.

Original Article

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count Chet Harhut, deputy manager, of the Allegheny County Division of Elections, wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots, at the division of elections offices in downtown Pittsburgh, May 27, 2020. (AP)

MARC LEVY Tuesday, 20 September 2022 10:26 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump and his allies seized on the drawn-out vote processing and counting in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election in support of claims that fraud cost him victory in the battleground state — and election officials worry that a replay could be on the horizon in November's crucial Senate and governor races.

And it's not just Pennsylvania. Michigan and Wisconsin are other crucial swing states that allow no-excuse mail-in ballots but give local election offices no time before Election Day to process them.

Election workers' inability to do that work ahead of time means many of the mailed ballots may not get counted on Election Day, delaying results in tight races and leaving a gaping hole for misinformation to potentially surge.

“That time between the polls closing on election night and the last vote being counted is really being exploited by people who want to undermine confidence in the process,” said Al Schmidt, a Philadelphia election commissioner during the 2020 presidential election who is now president and CEO of the good-government group Committee of Seventy.

The first step in processing mailed ballots, or pre-canvassing, is a routine but crucial administrative task that allows election workers to verify voters’ signatures and addresses, or spot problems that could be fixed by voters. Once ballots are deemed valid, they are removed from their envelopes — another time-consuming task — so they are ready to be counted on Election Day.

Not in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, though. Thirty-eight other states — including Republican-controlled ones such as Florida, Georgia and Texas — allow mailed ballots to be processed before Election Day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

For the three critical battleground states, such objections fall flat. Efforts since 2020 to give local election workers more time before Election Day to process mailed ballots have died in Republican-controlled legislatures.

Instead, Republicans in those states have sought to tighten restrictions on voting by mail — provisions vetoed by Democratic governors.

“Counting the ballots should be driven by security, not speed,” Wisconsin state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, a Republican, said earlier this year as lawmakers were considering legislation on the issue. “Why would we want to give bad actors the chance to see ballots prior to Election Day?”

Republicans helped kill a bipartisan bill that would have allowed more time for processing mailed ballots in Wisconsin amid claims that it would give partisans more time to cheat or leak vote counts early.

Like Pennsylvania, election workers in Michigan and Wisconsin must wait until Election Day to start the pre-canvassing of mailed ballots.

For now, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, requests for absentee ballots are running below 2020's rate, relieving some of the burden on local election offices.

Still, Claire Woodall-Vogg, executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, said it's "a total guess” when counting will finish in Wisconsin’s most populous county. She hopes it will wrap up by 11 p.m. on election night. A late rush of dropped-off ballots — as happened in 2020 — isn't expected this year, she said, because courts banned the use of drop boxes.

In Michigan in 2020, lawmakers agreed to give clerks in more populous cities and towns 10 hours on the day before Election Day to process mailed ballots. Clerks unsuccessfully sought a similar provision for this year. The Michigan Secretary of State's office said it was too early to estimate how many absentee ballots might be cast or how long it will take to process them.

Original Article

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count

Mail Ballot Fight Persists in Key States, Sure to Slow Count manager wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots Chet Harhut, deputy manager, of the Allegheny County Division of Elections, wheels a dolly loaded with mail-in ballots, at the division of elections offices in downtown Pittsburgh, May 27, 2020. (AP)

MARC LEVY Tuesday, 20 September 2022 10:26 PM EDT

Former President Donald Trump and his allies seized on the drawn-out vote processing and counting in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election in support of claims that fraud cost him victory in the battleground state — and election officials worry that a replay could be on the horizon in November's crucial Senate and governor races.

And it's not just Pennsylvania. Michigan and Wisconsin are other crucial swing states that allow no-excuse mail-in ballots but give local election offices no time before Election Day to process them.

Election workers' inability to do that work ahead of time means many of the mailed ballots may not get counted on Election Day, delaying results in tight races and leaving a gaping hole for misinformation to potentially surge.

"That time between the polls closing on election night and the last vote being counted is really being exploited by people who want to undermine confidence in the process," said Al Schmidt, a Philadelphia election commissioner during the 2020 presidential election who is now president and CEO of the good-government group Committee of Seventy.

The first step in processing mailed ballots, or pre-canvassing, is a routine but crucial administrative task that allows election workers to verify voters' signatures and addresses, or spot problems that could be fixed by voters. Once ballots are deemed valid, they are removed from their envelopes — another time-consuming task — so they are ready to be counted on Election Day.

Not in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, though. Thirty-eight other states — including Republican-controlled ones such as Florida, Georgia, and Texas — allow mailed ballots to be processed before Election Day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

For the three critical battleground states, such objections fall flat. Efforts since 2020 to give local election workers more time before Election Day to process mailed ballots have died in Republican-controlled legislatures.

Instead, Republicans in those states have sought to tighten restrictions on voting by mail — provisions vetoed by Democratic governors.

"Counting the ballots should be driven by security, not speed," Wisconsin state Rep. Janel Brandtjen, a Republican, said earlier this year as lawmakers were considering legislation on the issue. "Why would we want to give bad actors the chance to see ballots prior to Election Day?"

Republicans helped kill a bipartisan bill that would have allowed more time for processing mailed ballots in Wisconsin amid claims that it would give partisans more time to cheat or leak vote counts early.

Like Pennsylvania, election workers in Michigan and Wisconsin must wait until Election Day to start the pre-canvassing of mailed ballots.

For now, in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, requests for absentee ballots are running below 2020's rate, relieving some of the burden on local election offices.

Still, Claire Woodall-Vogg, executive director of the Milwaukee Election Commission, said it's "a total guess" when counting will finish in Wisconsin's most populous county. She hopes it will wrap up by 11 p.m. on election night. A late rush of dropped-off ballots — as happened in 2020 — isn't expected this year, she said, because courts banned the use of drop boxes.

In Michigan in 2020, lawmakers agreed to give clerks in more populous cities and towns 10 hours on the day before Election Day to process mailed ballots. Clerks unsuccessfully sought a similar provision for this year. The Michigan Secretary of State's office said it was too early to estimate how many absentee ballots might be cast or how long it will take to process them.

Original Article

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants ‘October Surprise’

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants 'October Surprise' (Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Jeremy Frankel | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:38 PM EDT

Lawyers for former President Trump and for the DOJ held a hearing for the first time Tuesday with Special Master Raymond Dearie, who was appointed to conduct an independent review of records taken by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago last month. Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, joined Newsmax to break down the hearing’s details.

Appearing on “Rob Schmitt Tonight” on Tuesday, Habba told host Rob Schmitt that the hope for a special master was that the special master would mediate the issue of which documents are considered personal records, which is governed by the Presidential Records Act. The DOJ conducted the raid, in Habba’s opinion, because the November midterms are coming and they wanted an “October surprise.” However, Dearie said he did not want to do look at the classified documents, which, according to Habba, was the whole purpose of the special master.

However, Habba praised U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who had appointed Dearie as Special Master, for giving a Nov. 30 deadline for Dearie to complete his work, saying that “that’s a problem if you're politicizing an agenda, because the November midterms will come and go, and they will not get done what they want to do, which is basically trying to take down Donald Trump. That's my opinion. But it is what it is, and that's why they're pushing, they’re appealing.”

The DOJ is currently appealing to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Cannon’s ruling and allow them to continue reviewing the documents they seized, even as the special master is reviewing them.

“They're panicking,” Habba added. “This is what happens. This is not what the DOJ is supposed to do. This is not what the FBI is supposed to do. But that is what I think is happening,” Habba continued.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants ‘October Surprise’

Alina Habba to Newsmax: DOJ Is Panicking, Wants 'October Surprise' (Newsmax/"Rob Schmitt Tonight")

By Jeremy Frankel | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:38 PM EDT

Lawyers for former President Trump and for the DOJ held a hearing for the first time Tuesday with Special Master Raymond Dearie, who was appointed to conduct an independent review of records taken by the FBI from Mar-a-Lago last month. Trump's lawyer, Alina Habba, joined Newsmax to break down the hearing's details.

Appearing on "Rob Schmitt Tonight" on Tuesday, Habba told host Rob Schmitt that the hope for a special master was that the special master would mediate the issue of which documents are considered personal records, which is governed by the Presidential Records Act. The DOJ conducted the raid, in Habba's opinion, because the November midterms are coming and they wanted an "October surprise." However, Dearie said he did not want to look at the classified documents, which, according to Habba, was the whole purpose of the special master.

However, Habba praised U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, who had appointed Dearie as Special Master, for giving a Nov. 30 deadline for Dearie to complete his work, saying that "that's a problem if you're politicizing an agenda, because the November midterms will come and go, and they will not get done what they want to do, which is basically trying to take down Donald Trump. That's my opinion. But it is what it is, and that's why they're pushing, they're appealing."

The DOJ is currently appealing to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn Cannon's ruling and allow them to continue reviewing the documents they seized, even as the special master is reviewing them.

"They're panicking," Habba added. "This is what happens. This is not what the DOJ is supposed to do. This is not what the FBI is supposed to do. But that is what I think is happening," Habba continued.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill

House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill House to Vote on Electoral Count Act Reform Bill

Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., vice chairwoman of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the U.S. Capitol. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

By Nick Koutsobinas | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 09:25 PM EDT

The House on Wednesday will vote on a bill introduced by two members of the Jan. 6 panel, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., and Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., on Monday designed to prevent election interference.

According to The Hill, the legislation, the Presidential Election Reform Act, would reform the long-standing Electoral Count Act of 1887. The measure would clarify that the vice president's role in certifying the election is purely ministerial and "would require one-third of lawmakers in each chamber to back any effort to object to electors."

"I want to make absolutely clear at the outset that what we saw happen in 2020, what Donald Trump tried to convince the vice president to do, was illegal under existing law, and we begin by affirming that," Cheney told reporters Tuesday. "But we need to then take steps to make sure that another Jan. 6 is something that never happens again."

While similar legislation has been introduced by a bipartisan collective of legislators in the Senate, the House bill would include other proactive measures, including limitations on extending elections.

The legislation is seeing pushback among Republicans, however.

"If you look at the bill," House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., said, "it's got some components, like it allows more lawsuits to drag out elections, to allow trial lawyers to change states' election laws that were debated in their legislatures, which goes against the democratic principles that even the Constitution lays out for how elections should work."

After Scalise's statement, which he offered to reporters on Tuesday, his office began pressing other Republican lawmakers to vote along party lines. In a memo to House GOP offices, Scalise's office wrote that the "flawed" legislation "tramples on State sovereignty and opens the door for destructive private rights of action that will only delay results and inject more uncertainty into our elections."

The measure also outlines constitutional justifications for objecting to electoral votes,

But the bill's sponsors say the Presidential Election Reform Act will clarify that legislators can raise objections to electoral votes only for a narrow set of issues.

In addition, the bill outlines that candidates can obtain a federal court order if a governor fails to transmit the electors' votes to Congress and asserts that presidential elections can be extended if and only if a federal judge rules that the state has undergone a genuine "catastrophic event" otherwise changing the outcome of the race.

Still, other Republicans say they oppose the bill because it was "rushed" into the House.

"The proposal before us has been rushed through in a highly partisan manner," Rep. Rodney Davis, R-Ill., ranking member of the House Administration Committee, said Tuesday at a House Rules Committee meeting.

"Why rush such a significant piece of legislation when the next presidential certification won't happen for over two years?" Davis questioned. "It's simple: The midterm elections are just weeks away, and Democrats and the [Jan. 6] committee are desperately trying to talk about their favorite topic, and that is former President Trump."

When Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., chairman of the Jan. 6 committee, was asked about the GOP's push against the bill, he replied, "that's sad."

"If they saw what happened on Jan. 6," Thompson added, "then it's obvious this is not who we are as a country, and so much of it was put forth under the assumption that somehow the vice president could stop the will of the people. And so this legislation just stops that absolutely in its tracks. So I wouldn't see a responsible member of this body not wanting to make sure that something like Jan. 6 never happened again."

The sponsored bill by Lofgren and Cheney comes as the Senate has moved more earnestly on a similar proposal introduced in July that would also tweak the Electoral Count Act. But the key difference is the Senate version is that it would require just a one-fifth vote of support to back objections to electors. The Senate version already has the support of 10 Republicans.

Thompson told reporters Tuesday he thinks the Senate version will garner more support because it was introduced first.

"Ours," he said, "for all intents and purposes, just hit this week, and I think once people get an opportunity to see what our bill encompasses versus the Senate bill, I think you'll see people moving to our side."

Still, the Lofgren-Cheney bill holds one more difference than the Senate bill. It outlines requirements for seeking to declare an election failed, something Cheney says would block possible future abuse by those looking to extend an election.

"We wanted to be very clear and specific about the definition of catastrophic event and wanted to make sure that in the future you couldn't have a situation, for example, where false claims of fraud could be made to allow a state to refuse to certify valid votes," Cheney said.

"We thought it was very important to be clear about both what constituted a catastrophic event, what the impact of such a thing would be, and, yes, to help ensure that we're preventing misuse and abuse of those kinds of claims in future elections," she added.

Original Article

House GOP Leader: Don’t Fund Govt if Dems Don’t Fund Border

House GOP Leader: Don't Fund Govt if Dems Don't Fund Border (Newsmax)

By Eric Mack | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:44 PM EDT

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., is telling his Republican colleagues to vote against a continuing resolution to fund the government unless Democrats and President Joe Biden pony up to secure the southern border.

"President Biden is asking for a government funding bill that simply kicks the can to an unaccountable lame-duck Congress that does nothing to actually address the nation's problems – especially the crisis at our southern border," McCarthy wrote Tuesday in a statement posted to Twitter. "Under Biden and Pelosi there have been more than 3.5 million illegal border crossings – more than the entire population of Chicago.

"Democrats' open border policies have led to an unprecedented crisis, and they have no plan to secure the border.

"If Biden & Democrats don't use this government funding bill to address the border crisis immediately, I'm voting NO on this bill and I urge my colleagues to do the same."

The fiscal year ends Oct. 1 and passing a budget in Congress has proved difficult in recent years. The continuing resolution (C.R.) maintains last year's spending limits and keeps the government running, but there have been government shutdowns in the past when partisan divides refuse to pass a new C.R.

The talks for funding the government currently center around passing a temporary C.R. until after the midterm elections, when Congress can address the appropriations again in December.

Former President Donald Trump has blasted Republicans, namely Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., for not using a government shutdown as leverage in talks for a new agreement on appropriations.

The border crisis has bubbled to the forefront of the midterm election cycle as Republicans have sought to pin down Biden and Democrats on their open border and sanctuary city policies.

Original Article

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office Couy Griffin looks on (AP)

MORGAN LEE Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:34 PM EDT

A New Mexico politician and Trump supporter who was removed and barred from elected office for his role in the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is attempting to appeal that decision to the state Supreme Court.

Cowboys for Trump co-founder and former county commissioner Couy Griffin on Tuesday notified the high court of his intent to appeal.

The ruling against Griffin this month from a Santa Fe-based District Court was the first to remove or bar an elected official from office in connection with the attack on the U.S. Capitol building that disrupted Congress as it was trying to certify President Joe Biden's 2020 electoral victory.

Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin has invoked free speech guarantees in his defense and says his banishment from public office disenfranchises his political constituents in Otero County.

He was barred from office under provisions of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which holds that anyone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution can be barred from office for engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The provisions were put in place shortly after the Civil War.

A flurry of similar lawsuits around the country are seeking to use the provision to punish politicians who took part in Jan. 6.

Griffin says he continues to act as his own legal counsel in the case.

"Honestly, I have felt very abandoned by many," Griffin said.

Conservative activists aligned with Griffin have urged supporters to file disciplinary complaints against the judge who barred Griffin from office.

Griffin, a 48-year-old former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found Cowboys for Trump in 2019. The promotional group staged horseback parades to spread President Donald Trump's conservative message about gun rights, immigration controls, and abortion restrictions.

This year, Griffin voted twice as a county commissioner against certifying New Mexico's June 7 primary election, in a standoff over election integrity fueled by allegations about the security of voting equipment in the Republican-dominated county.

Original Article

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office

Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office Cowboys for Trump Co-founder Appeals Ban From Public Office (AP)

MORGAN LEE Tuesday, 20 September 2022 08:34 PM EDT

A New Mexico politician and Trump supporter who was removed and barred from elected office for his role in the U.S. Capitol riot on Jan. 6, 2021, is attempting to appeal that decision to the state Supreme Court.

Cowboys for Trump co-founder and former county commissioner Couy Griffin on Tuesday notified the high court of his intent to appeal.

The ruling against Griffin this month from a Santa Fe-based District Court was the first to remove or bar an elected official from office in connection with the attack on the U.S. Capitol building that disrupted Congress as it was trying to certify President Joe Biden’s 2020 electoral victory.

Griffin was previously convicted in federal court of a misdemeanor for entering the Capitol grounds on Jan. 6, without going inside the building. He was sentenced to 14 days and given credit for time served.

Griffin has invoked free speech guarantees in his defense and says his banishment from public office disenfranchises his political constituents in Otero County.

He was barred from office under provisions of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which holds that anyone who has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution can be barred from office for engaging in insurrection or rebellion. The provisions were put in place shortly after the Civil War.

A flurry of similar lawsuits around the country are seeking to use the provision to punish politicians who took part in Jan. 6.

Griffin says he continues to act as his own legal counsel in the case.

“Honestly I have felt very abandoned by many,” Griffin said.

Conservative activists aligned with Griffin have urged supporters to file disciplinary complaints against the judge who barred Griffin from office.

Griffin, a 48-year-old former rodeo rider and former pastor, helped found Cowboys for Trump in 2019. The promotional group staged horseback parades to spread President Donald Trump’s conservative message about gun rights, immigration controls and abortion restrictions.

This year, Griffin voted twice as a county commissioner against certifying New Mexico’s June 7 primary election, in a standoff over election integrity fueled by allegations about the security of voting equipment in the Republican-dominated county.

Original Article

Rep. Roy to Newsmax: Southern Border Crisis A ‘Political Game for Democrats’

Rep. Roy to Newsmax: Southern Border Crisis A 'Political Game for Democrats' (Newsmax/"Spicer & Co.")

By Jay Clemons | Tuesday, 20 September 2022 07:07 PM EDT

Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, didn't see the humor in President Joe Biden's remarks from Tuesday, quipping that Delaware "has a beautiful shoreline," when asked if Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was planning to send illegal immigrants to the president's home state.

Biden's response was a "perfect example of how [immigration] is a political game for Democrats," and migrants are "dying as a result," Roy told Newsmax Tuesday evening, while appearing on "Spicer & Co." with host Sean Spicer.

When Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Florida's DeSantis shipped approximately 50 migrants to the Massachusetts beach community of Martha's Vineyard last week, Roy reasons it brought attention to the every-day chaos along the United States-Mexico border.

From Roy's perspective, the Republican governors "exposed the hypocrisy" of the Democrat-controlled cities and states which previously trumpeted its "sanctuary" status, only to have Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker call in the National Guard to remove the migrants from Martha's Vineyard after less than 48 hours.

Abbott and DeSantis made the immigration issue "front and center" nationally, says Roy.

However, instead of Democrats heeding that lesson, Roy says their main takeaway from the Martha's Vineyard incident was, 'Hey, we made [the migrants] some sandwiches. Now, let's get 'em off the island.'

Overall, Roy says the Martha's Vineyard episode put a public face on the Democrats' indifference toward southern border issues.

"Some little girl is getting raped [along the border] right now, because of this administration," says Roy, who oversees Texas' 21st Congressional District, covering a large swath of land between Austin and San Antonio.

The Texas Republican also took exception to his GOP colleagues Tuesday, for letting Democrats and the Biden administration get away with "reckless" border policies, primarily providing opposition that amounts to "lip service."

"[The Biden administration is] using exceptions to swallow the whole of border security," says Roy, while alleging illegal immigrants aren't even claiming asylum anymore at the border, since they've been told border officials will largely stand down on conducting extensive captures and seizures.

"The American people demand we stop this," says Roy, while pledging substantial investigative oversight changes next year, if Republicans take over the House chamber in the upcoming midterm elections (Nov. 8).

"[Democrats] are purposely lying about the border. … These are impeachable acts," says Roy.

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

GOP’s Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate

GOP's Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate GOP's Hard-Line Tactics on Migrants Refocus Midterm Debate Migrants, who boarded a bus in Texas, listen to volunteers offering assistance after being dropped off within view of the U.S. Capitol building in Washington last month. (Getty)

STEVE PEOPLES, ADRIANA GOMEZ LICON and PAUL WEBER Tuesday, 20 September 2022 05:53 PM EDT

They’ve delivered migrants on planes and buses to Washington, D.C., New York City — even Martha’s Vineyard. And the Republican governors of Florida and Texas may be just getting started.

Govs. Ron DeSantis of Florida and Greg Abbott of Texas insist such dramatic steps are need to highlight a genuine crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, where thousands of migrants stream into the country illegally each day. But weeks away from their own competitive reelections, friends and foes alike acknowledged that such hard-line tactics have effectively refocused November’s midterm elections — at least, temporarily — away from abortion rights and toward an issue more favorable to Republicans.

A defiant DeSantis on Tuesday blasted the Biden administration's inaction on the Southern border and celebrated his own policies for making illegal immigration “a front-burner issue” ahead of the midterms.

“It will be a big issue in the elections, I can tell you that,” DeSantis said. “It’s already made more of an impact than anyone thought it could possibly make. But we’re going to continue to make more of an impact.”

Indeed, DeSantis and Abbott are pressing forward with — and even expanding on — controversial campaigns to ship thousands of immigrants from Texas to Democratic-led states and cities. Beyond shifting the national debate, their divisive moves could also serve to strengthen their national brands — and help legitimize their controversial policies — as they consider 2024 presidential bids.

“I personally thought it was a good idea," Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said Tuesday.

The governors' rhetoric is reminiscent of former President Donald Trump’s dire warnings ahead of the 2018 midterms that a migrant caravan threatened the Southern border. Trump’s GOP lost 40 seats in the House and gained two Senate seats that year.

Democrats from Connecticut to California have generated momentum in recent weeks by campaigning on the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade — and the GOP's subsequent push to outlaw abortion in dozens of states. Republicans, meanwhile, want to make the midterms a referendum on President Joe Biden and concerns about the economy, crime and immigration.

This week, at least, immigration is leading the national debate.

“What they’re doing is raising the salience and relevance of the immigration issue, which is important to Republican voters and can help drive turnout,” said veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse. “For the voters we’re appealing to, for the most part, the benefits outweigh the risks by a considerable margin.”

There are real risks, however, particularly for DeSantis, who has taken credit for two weekend charter planes that carried about 50 migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard, a small, wealthy island off Massachusetts' coast. The immigrants were told they were going to Boston.

A Texas sheriff on Monday opened an investigation into DeSantis' flights, though the law enforcement official, an elected Democrat, did not say what laws may have been broken in putting 48 Venezuelans on private planes from San Antonio, the first stop for many migrants who cross the border.

Rep. Joaquin Castro, a Democrat who represents San Antonio, has called on the Justice Department to investigate the flights as well.

“These guys are immature, sadistic Trump imitators. That’s what they are,” Castro said of Abbott and DeSantis. “This is sadistic behavior. Whatever political point they were trying to make has been made a long time ago.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is viewed by many as a future Democratic presidential candidate, called DeSantis “a disgrace” for using taxpayer money to transport immigrants to other states. Over the summer, Newsom paid for campaign ads in Texas and Florida critical of the governors.

DeSantis, who has stepped up travel on behalf of GOP candidates in the midterm elections, vowed to spend “every penny” of $12 million set aside by the state legislature for such “relocation programs.” On Tuesday, local officials in a Delaware community close to Biden's vacation home were preparing to receive another one of DeSantis' planes full of migrants from Texas, although the Florida governor refused to confirm the development.

Despite fierce criticism and potential legal liabilities, there has been little evidence of widespread political backlash in either state.

Democratic sympathizers in Florida staged news conferences in recent days condemning the governors while others compared DeSantis to late Cuban leader Fidel Castro on Spanish radio. But the number of Venezuelan voters in the state remains relatively small. Much of the community that exists has formed a coalition with Cubans, a crucial bloc in Florida that has increasingly voted Republican.

“Governors Abbott and DeSantis have had enough of it and decided to do something for people to pay attention,” said Ernesto Ackerman, a Republican who heads the Independent Venezuelan American Citizens. “This is a country of laws, not of scoundrels and tramps.”

In Texas, Abbott has spent the past two years pushing a series of provocative immigration measures that have elevated his national profile and kept critics on his right at bay. The two-term governor converted a former prison near Texas’ southern border into a jail for migrants, gave the National Guard extraordinary arrest powers and gridlocked some of America’s busiest ports for a week by mandating additional inspections for 18-wheelers crossing into the U.S.

The Abbott administration has been busing migrants to Washington, Chicago and New York City for months. The busing campaign includes two busloads of people who were dropped off outside Vice President Kamala Harris' residence last weekend.

Longtime Abbott adviser Dave Carney said Texas would expand its operation this week to include new drop-off locations in other states.

“We’ve been focused on this for two years. It’s got nothing to do with politics. The communities are screaming bloody murder,” Carney said, referring to border towns flooded with immigrants apprehended at the border and subsequently released.

Republicans cast the border crisis as a failure of the Biden administration.

The federal government this week reported that authorities stopped migrants 2.15 million times from October through August, the first time that measure has ever topped 2 million and a 39% increase from the same period a year earlier.

Border crossings have been fueled partly by repeat crossers because there are no legal consequences for getting caught under a pandemic-era rule that denies a right to seek asylum. Even so, the numbers are extraordinarily high.

While Abbott and DeSantis have also highlighted their accomplishments on issues related to the economy, neither has taken steps to moderate their immigration policies as the November election nears.

Abbott is running against former Democratic Rep. Beto O’Rourke, who has outraised Abbott in a contest that represents the toughest challenge of the governor’s political career.

Immigration remains a crucial issue for Democrats who have long believed Texas’ booming cities and shifting demographics would eventually turn America’s biggest red state blue. But in overwhelmingly Hispanic counties on the border, Republicans are making an aggressive play for three congressional seats this fall after Trump made major gains in the region in 2020.

It was much the same in South Florida, where Trump's GOP performed better than expected in the last election.

DeSantis is running against former Rep. Charlie Crist, whose campaign has charged in recent days that the governor “shot himself in the foot” by shipping immigrants from Texas to Massachusetts. The move sparked a fundraising surge for Crist that exceeded $1 million over a 48-hour period, according to spokesperson Samantha Ramirez.

Republican candidates on the November ballot don't seem worried.

“I think it is a valid maneuver to use in order to try to wake up or at least expose the hypocrisy of progressive Democrats that say the border is secure and there’s no problem down here whatsoever,” said Joseph Swiger, one of dozens of Republicans running for local office in Texas border counties where the GOP seldom bothered to recruit candidates in the past.

Original Article