Hillary Clinton Is a ‘No’ on Running for President Again

Hillary Clinton Is a 'No' on Running for President Again Hillary Clinton grimaces during her 2016 presidential election concession speech Hillary Clinton stands contrite during her 2016 presidential election concession speech. (AP)

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 10:38 PM EDT

Hillary Clinton is hanging up the bags, revealing to CBS Evening News on Tuesday she will not be seeking the White House for a third time amid rumors of a potential return.

"Would you ever run for president again?" interviewer Norah O'Donnell asked the former secretary of state and first lady.

"No, no," she replied. "But I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that we have a president who respects our democracy and the rule of law and upholds our institutions."

Clinton then condemned the possibility of former President Donald Trump running in 2024, adding, "he should be soundly defeated" and "it should start in the Republican Party."

"Grow a backbone; stand up to this guy," Clinton stated. "And heaven forbid, if he gets the nomination, he needs to be defeated roundly and sent back to Mar-a-Lago."

She later rejected any comparison of her controversial private email server scandal to the sensitive documents found at Trump's South Florida residence, assuring the two situations were "really different."

"I had a very different situation where I was cleared, and the guy just kept on talking, and talking, and then came up with a new reason to talk some more 10 days before the election," Clinton said of then-FBI Director James Comey.

"It was in the middle of an election. There was no there, there, and the guy never shut up," the one-time nominee continued. "I think it's a really different comparison to what's going on here."

Clinton also applauded the FBI and Justice Department for being "incredibly patient, quiet, careful until they finally apparently thought that national security was at stake."

Original Article

Hillary Clinton Is a ‘No’ on Running for President Again

Hillary Clinton Is a 'No' on Running for President Again Hillary Clinton grimaces during her 2016 presidential election concession speech Hillary Clinton stands contrite during her 2016 presidential election concession speech. (AP)

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 10:38 PM EDT

Hillary Clinton is hanging up the bags, revealing to CBS Evening News on Tuesday she will not be seeking the White House for a third time amid rumors of a potential return.

"Would you ever run for president again?" interviewer Norah O'Donnell asked the former secretary of state and first lady.

"No, no," she replied. "But I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that we have a president who respects our democracy and the rule of law and upholds our institutions."

Clinton then condemned the possibility of former President Donald Trump running in 2024, adding, "he should be soundly defeated" and "it should start in the Republican Party."

"Grow a backbone; stand up to this guy," Clinton stated. "And heaven forbid, if he gets the nomination, he needs to be defeated roundly and sent back to Mar-a-Lago."

She later rejected any comparison of her controversial private email server scandal to the sensitive documents found at Trump's South Florida residence, assuring the two situations were "really different."

"I had a very different situation where I was cleared, and the guy just kept on talking, and talking, and then came up with a new reason to talk some more 10 days before the election," Clinton said of then-FBI Director James Comey.

"It was in the middle of an election. There was no there, there, and the guy never shut up," the one-time nominee continued. "I think it's a really different comparison to what's going on here."

Clinton also applauded the FBI and Justice Department for being "incredibly patient, quiet, careful until they finally apparently thought that national security was at stake."

Hillary Clinton Is a ‘No’ on Running for President Again

Hillary Clinton Is a 'No' on Running for President Again Hillary Clinton grimaces during her 2016 presidential election concession speech Hillary Clinton stands contrite during her 2016 presidential election concession speech. (AP)

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 10:38 PM EDT

Hillary Clinton is hanging up the gloves, revealing to CBS Evening News on Tuesday she will not be seeking the White House for a third time amid rumors of a potential return.

"Would you ever run for president again?" interviewer Norah O'Donnell asked the former secretary of state and first lady.

"No, no," she replied. "But I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that we have a president who respects our democracy and the rule of law and upholds our institutions."

Clinton then condemned the possibility of former President Donald Trump running in 2024, adding, "he should be soundly defeated" and "it should start in the Republican Party."

"Grow a backbone; stand up to this guy," Clinton stated. "And heaven forbid, if he gets the nomination, he needs to be defeated roundly and sent back to Mar-a-Lago."

She later rejected any comparison of her controversial private email server scandal to the sensitive documents found at Trump's South Florida residence, assuring the two situations were "really different."

"I had a very different situation where I was cleared, and the guy just kept on talking, and talking, and then came up with a new reason to talk some more 10 days before the election," Clinton said of then-FBI Director James Comey.

"It was in the middle of an election. There was no there, there, and the guy never shut up," the one-time nominee continued. "I think it's a really different comparison to what's going on here."

Clinton also applauded the FBI and Justice Department for being "incredibly patient, quiet, careful until they finally apparently thought that national security was at stake."

Hillary Clinton Is a ‘No’ on Running for President Again

Hillary Clinton Is a 'No' on Running for President Again Hillary Clinton grimaces during her 2016 presidential election concession speech Hillary Clinton stands contrite during her 2016 presidential election concession speech. (AP)

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 10:38 PM EDT

Hillary Clinton is hanging up the gloves, revealing to CBS Evening News on Tuesday she will not be seeking the White House for a third time amid rumors of a potential return.

"Would you ever run for president again?" interviewer Norah O'Donnell asked the former secretary of state and first lady.

"No, no," she replied. "But I'm going to do everything I can to make sure that we have a president who respects our democracy and the rule of law and upholds our institutions."

Clinton then condemned the possibility of former President Donald Trump running in 2024, adding, "he should be soundly defeated" and "it should start in the Republican Party."

"Grow a backbone; stand up to this guy," Clinton stated. "And heaven forbid, if he gets the nomination, he needs to be defeated roundly and sent back to Mar-a-Lago."

She later rejected any comparison of her controversial private email server scandal to the sensitive documents found at Trump's South Florida residence, assuring the two situations were "really different."

"I had a very different situation where I was cleared, and the guy just kept on talking, and talking, and then came up with a new reason to talk some more 10 days before the election," Clinton said of then-FBI Director James Comey.

"It was in the middle of an election. There was no there, there, and the guy never shut up," the one-time nominee continued. "I think it's a really different comparison to what's going on here."

Clinton also applauded the FBI and Justice Department for being "incredibly patient, quiet, careful until they finally apparently thought that national security was at stake."

Original Article

Rep. Mullin to Newsmax: Biden’s Speech Meant to Give False Impression of Strength

Rep. Mullin to Newsmax: Biden's Speech Meant to Give False Impression of Strength (Newsmax/''Rob Schmitt Tonight'')

By Jeremy Frankel | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:52 PM EDT

Rep. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., blasted President Joe Biden for his speech calling ''MAGA Republicans'' the biggest threat to democracy in this country, telling Newsmax on Tuesday that the statement is ''dangerous in itself.''

''I think President Biden owes every patriot American out there that's from a red state that voted for President Trump an apology, and he should do it now,'' Mullin told ''Rob Schmitt Tonight.''

''The guy ran on unity, and here he is dividing the country by calling us the biggest threat,'' he continued.

What is wrong with just loving America and believing in the Constitution, Mullin asked rhetorically.

He added that Biden's speech, coupled with the red lighting and military in the background, is meant to give Americans the impression that Biden is strong, but the American people know that he is weak.

''The American people don't trust him. … The idea of us going to conflict with this president scares the daylights out of people, so they're trying to change his image,'' Mullin said.

Mullin is running for Senate in the special general election on Nov. 8.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Massachusetts AG Maura Healy Wins Dem Governor Nomination

Massachusetts AG Maura Healy Wins Dem Governor Nomination Massachusetts attorney general Maura Healy leans in to speak to hillary clinton during a harvard event Massachusetts AG Maura Healy (Charles Krupa/AP)

By Eric Mack | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:55 PM EDT

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey cruised in her Democrat primary Tuesday night, Decision Desk HQ projects, bidding to flip the blue state governorship in these November midterm elections.

Healey would become the first woman and first openly gay candidate elected governor. She easily outdistanced Sonia Chang-Diaz, who remained on the ballot after withdrawing from the race. She will face Geoff Diehl or Chris Doughty, who are vying to replace retiring Republican Gov. Charlie Baker, who opted not to seek a third term.

Diehl is endorsed by former President Donald Trump and early returns have him in a race too close to call against the moderate candidate Doughty.

Voting in the Cape Cod town of Barnstable was extended until midnight after a mechanical issue with the town clerk's vault blocked the clerk from getting access to ballots, delaying the delivery of ballots to polling locations.

Diehl, the favorite among state Republican Party delegates in Massachusetts, has ties to Trump stretching to 2016, when he served as co-chair for Trump's presidential campaign in the state. Trump lost Massachusetts by almost 30 percentage points in his two presidential campaigns. Diehl has also opposed COVID-19 protocols and hailed the Supreme Court ruling overruling Roe v. Wade.

Doughty, a businessman, said he supported some of Trump's initiatives but wants to focus on challenges facing Massachusetts, which he said is increasingly unaffordable.

Diehl has come to embrace Trump push for election integrity after the 2020 election. Diehl said last year he did not think it was a "stolen election" but later said the election was rigged. Doughty, meanwhile, has said he believes President Joe Biden was legitimately elected.

The challenge for both is that support of Trump may play well among the party's conservative wing but could be a political albatross in a state where registered Republicans make up less than 10% of the electorate compared to about 31% for Democrats and about 57% for independents.

Diehl faced a similar struggle when he challenged Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., in 2018. He won a three-way Republican primary only to capture just over a third of the vote in the general election.

Doughty said he would work to lower taxes and has said that although he considers himself "pro-life," he accepts the state Supreme Court decision recognizing a right to abortion in Massachusetts.

Doughty has reported raising nearly $2.3 million for his campaign, most of it coming out of his own pocket, compared with Diehl, who has raised about $582,000. Healey has the largest campaign bank account — about $3.4 million.

Massachusetts has a history of electing fiscally conservative, socially moderate Republican governors — including former Govs. William Weld and Mitt Romney — to provide a check on overwhelming Democrat legislative majorities. Baker, another Republican in that mold, has remained popular in the state.

The election also features several statewide contested Democratic primaries, including for attorney general and secretary of the commonwealth.

Two Democrats are jockeying for the top law enforcement office: former Boston City Councilor Andrea Campbell and workers' rights attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan. A week before the election, a third candidate, former assistant attorney general Quentin Palfrey, announced he was suspending his campaign and endorsed Campbell; he will remain on the ballot.

Campbell would be the first Black woman to hold the office in Massachusetts if elected.

The winner will face Republican Jay McMahon, a trial attorney who previously ran against Healey and lost.

Incumbent Democratic Secretary of the Commonwealth William Galvin is vying for an eighth term in office. He’s fielding a challenge from fellow Democrat Tanisha Sullivan, president of the Boston branch of the NAACP. Sullivan would be the first Black person to serve in that post in the state.

The winner will face Republican Rayla Campbell in November. Campbell is also Black.

There are also contested races in the Democratic primary for auditor and for the Democratic and Republican races for lieutenant governor.

None of the state’s nine incumbent Democratic U.S. House members is facing primary challengers. There are two contested Republican primaries in the 8th and 9th congressional districts.

A new state law makes "no excuse" mail-in ballots and early voting permanent fixtures in Massachusetts elections. Many of the voting options included in the new law were implemented during the height of the coronavirus pandemic and proved popular.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.

Original Article

Document Seized at Trump Home Described Foreign Govt’s Nuke Capabilities: Wash Post

Document Seized at Trump Home Described Foreign Govt's Nuke Capabilities: Wash Post Document Seized at Trump Home Described Foreign Govt's Nuke Capabilities: Wash Post This photo shows an aerial view of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Fla. (AP)

Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:31 PM EDT

A document describing a foreign government's military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was found in the FBI's search last month of former President Donald Trump's Florida home, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

The Post report, which cited people familiar with the matter, did not identify the foreign government discussed in the document.

According to the publication, the find underscored concerns among U.S. intelligence officials about classified material being held at the Florida property. As the Post reported, some seized documents detailed top-secret U.S. operations — operations so closely guarded that even many senior national security officials are kept out of the loop on the details.

"Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs, according to people familiar with the search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive details of an ongoing investigation."

The report said that after months of trying to recover documents from Mar-a-Lago, some still remained there and were unearthed in a court-approved search on Aug. 8.

It was in this final batch that the information on a foreign government's nuclear defense readiness was discovered, the paper said.

A judge has ordered that a special master be assigned to review documents taken from Mar-a-Lago, as the government conducts a risk assessment on what was being kept there.

For his part, former President Trump has assailed the manner in which the raid was conducted, calling it overly invasive and politically motivated. He has also maintained that documents kept there were covered by executive privilege, and that he had the authority to declassify documents as president.

Newsmax contributed to this report.

Original Article

Document Seized at Trump Home Described Foreign Govt’s Nuke Capabilities: Wash Post

Document Seized at Trump Home Described Foreign Govt's Nuke Capabilities: Wash Post aerial view of Mar-a-Lago This photo shows an aerial view of former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida. (AP)

Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:31 PM EDT

A document describing a foreign government's military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities, was found in the FBI's search last month of former President Donald Trump's Florida home, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

The Post report, which cited people familiar with the matter, did not identify the foreign government discussed in the document.

According to the publication, the find underscored concerns among U.S. intelligence officials about classified material being held at the Florida property. As the Post reported, some seized documents detailed top-secret U.S. operations – operations so closely guarded that even many senior national security officials are kept out of the loop on the details.

"Only the president, some members of his Cabinet or a near-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs, according to people familiar with the search, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive details of an ongoing investigation."

The report said that after months of trying to recover documents from Mar-a-Lago, some still remained there and were unearthed in a court-approved search on Aug. 8.

It was in this final batch that the information on a foreign government's nuclear defense readiness was discovered, the paper said.

A judge has ordered that a special master be assigned to review documents taken from Mar-a-Lago, as the government conducts a risk assessment on what was being kept there.

For his part, former President Trump has assailed the manner in which the raid was conducted, calling it overly invasive and politically motivated. He has also maintained that documents kept there were covered by executive privilege, and that he had the authority to declassify documents as president.

Newsmax contributed to this report.

Original Article

Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell

Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell Sen. Rick Scott, R-Florida, head of the Senate Republican campaign committee (AP)

David Morgan Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:10 PM EDT

The U.S. Senate Republican campaign chief denied on Tuesday that he is at odds with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell over the quality of party candidates in key swing states that could determine whether Republicans win control of the congressional chamber in the Nov. 8 midterm elections.

Senator Rick Scott, who heads the c, triggered party concerns about a potentially damaging quarrel with McConnell last week by railing against people in the party who he said were "trash-talking" Republican Senate candidates.

"It's an amazing act of cowardice, and ultimately, it's treasonous to the conservative cause," Scott wrote in a Sept. 1 Op-Ed article in the Washington Examiner. The article ran weeks after McConnell had cited candidate quality as a reason why Republicans could have a better chance of winning a majority in the House of Representatives than in the Senate.

But Scott told reporters on Tuesday that his comments were aimed at anonymous critics, not at McConnell.

"It said people are doing anonymous quotes and trashing our Republican candidates," Scott said after exiting a Republican leadership meeting with McConnell in the U.S. Capitol. Asked specifically if his references were about McConnell, Scott replied: "No."

"I think it's important that we all work together to figure out how we can win," Scott said.

First-time Senate Republican candidates endorsed by former President Donald Trump have weathered embarrassing gaffes or have failed to pull ahead of their Democratic rivals in key states such as Arizona, Georgia, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

With the Senate split 50-50 and Democrats in charge only because of Vice President Kamala Harris's tie-breaking vote, Republicans need a net gain of only one seat to gain the majority.

The Senate Republican campaign committee that Scott chairs has also been short on money, with $23 million of cash at the end of July. Its Democratic rival had $54 million, according to the Federal Election Commission.

Original Article

Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell

Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell Senate Republican Campaign Chief Denies Feud With McConnell Sen. Rick Scott, R-Florida, head of the Senate Republican campaign committee (AP)

David Morgan Tuesday, 06 September 2022 08:10 PM EDT

The U.S. Senate Republican campaign chief denied on Tuesday that he is at odds with Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell over the quality of party candidates in key swing states that could determine whether Republicans win control of the congressional chamber in the Nov. 8 midterm elections.

Senator Rick Scott, who heads the c, triggered party concerns about a potentially damaging quarrel with McConnell last week by railing against people in the party who he said were "trash-talking" Republican Senate candidates.

"It's an amazing act of cowardice, and ultimately, it's treasonous to the conservative cause," Scott wrote in a Sept. 1 Op-Ed article in the Washington Examiner. The article ran weeks after McConnell had cited candidate quality as a reason why Republicans could have a better chance of winning a majority in the House of Representatives than in the Senate.

But Scott told reporters on Tuesday that his comments were aimed at anonymous critics, not at McConnell.

"It said people are doing anonymous quotes and trashing our Republican candidates," Scott said after exiting a Republican leadership meeting with McConnell in the U.S. Capitol. Asked specifically if his references were about McConnell, Scott replied: "No."

"I think it's important that we all work together to figure out how we can win," Scott said.

First-time Senate Republican candidates endorsed by former President Donald Trump have weathered embarrassing gaffes or have failed to pull ahead of their Democratic rivals in key states such as Arizona, Georgia, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

With the Senate split 50-50 and Democrats in charge only because of Vice President Kamala Harris's tie-breaking vote, Republicans need a net gain of only one seat to gain the majority.

The Senate Republican campaign committee that Scott chairs has also been short on money, with $23 million of cash at the end of July. Its Democratic rival had $54 million, according to the Federal Election Commission.

Ex-Trump Official: Not Imposing ‘Serious Sanctions’ Led to Russian Gas Crunch

Ex-Trump Official: Not Imposing 'Serious Sanctions' Led to Russian Gas Crunch (Newsmax/"The Record With Greta Van Susteren")

By Jack Gournell | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 07:52 PM EDT

The West's failure to impose serious sanctions on Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime has led him to use natural gas as a weapon against Europe, a former Trump administration official told Newsmax.

Appearing Tuesday on "The Record With Greta Van Susteren," Marshall Billingslea, former special presidential envoy for arms control at the State Department and current senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, was asked about Russia's skirting of Western sanctions by selling surplus natural gas to China, which in turn is selling it to Europe after tacking on a fee.

"This is what happens when you fail to impose serious sanctions on the Russians and you create all of these loopholes that they can then exploit," Billingslea said. "But you know this latest threat, Putin has repeatedly shown that he will use Russian energy as a weapon against Europe. He did that as far back as the winter of 2009, long before he invaded Crimea. So there's nothing new here."

That is why then-President Donald Trump urged Germany to abandon dependency on Russian oil and gas, Billingslea said.

"Their arrogant response, that video clip that we've all seen of them at the U.N. laughing, hasn't aged very well for the Germans," he said.

"Germany will become totally dependent on Russian energy if it does not immediately change course," Trump said in the 2018 address to the United Nations as the German delegation laughed. "Here in the Western Hemisphere, we are committed to maintaining our independence from the encroachment of expansionist foreign powers."

With the war with Ukraine, Russia had already cut off 80% of natural gas via the Nord Stream 1 pipeline in response to sanctions. With winter approaching, it just announced a total shutdown until sanctions are lifted.

Meanwhile, Germany has postponed shutting down two nuclear power plants in case of a crisis.

"I don't know what constitutes a crisis, but at least the Germans are having a pause in what I think is a very unwise decision to shut down these plants," Billingslea said, "particularly because you know Putin will follow through on this decision to shutter the Nord Stream."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Biden, Truss Vow to Partner Against Russia, Economic Woes

Biden, Truss Vow to Partner Against Russia, Economic Woes U.K. Prime Minister Liz Truss poses with her husband Hugh O'Leary at 10 Downing Street on Tuesday in London U.K. Prime Minister Liz Truss poses with her husband Hugh O'Leary at 10 Downing Street on Tuesday in London. (Leon Neal/Getty Images)

Steve Holland and Trevor Hunnicutt Tuesday, 06 September 2022 07:46 PM EDT

President Joe Biden spoke by phone Tuesday to Liz Truss to congratulate her on becoming Britain's new prime minister and both leaders vowed to strengthen their relationship as they stand together against Russia.

"I look forward to deepening the special relationship between our countries and working in close cooperation on global challenges, including continued support for Ukraine as it defends itself against Russian aggression," Biden said in a tweet.

The two leaders spoke by phone on Tuesday afternoon, and could meet as soon as the U.N. General Assembly later in September.

The prime minister's office said in a statement they discussed deepening cooperation on NATO and the U.S.-Australia-Britain security agreement set up last year as a counter to China. Truss looks forward to "working closely with President Biden as leaders of free democracies to tackle shared challenges, particularly the extreme economic problems unleashed by Putin's war," the British statement said.

Truss won a leadership race for the governing Conservative Party on Monday and took over as prime minister on Tuesday, as Britain faces its most daunting set of challenges in decades.

The so-called special relationship between the United States and Britain has maintained solid continuity in recent years, despite frictions between then-President Donald Trump and then-Prime Minister Theresa May.

Washington and London have been aligned on helping Ukraine in its war against Russia and in countering China's influence in the Pacific. But a bilateral trade deal that some British officials hoped could offset trade and economic upheaval after Brexit has yet to materialize under Biden.

A U.S. official said the White House expects a lot of continuity from Boris Johnson to Truss and that Biden and Truss are likely to be aligned on countering Russia's invasion in Ukraine and China's rising influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Biden got on well with Johnson, but he could have tensions with Truss over Northern Ireland.

As a member of parliament, she introduced legislation to undo the Northern Ireland Protocol, and Biden has been insistent that Britain do nothing that could endanger a quarter century of peace in Northern Ireland.

The British statement on the phone call said both leaders "agreed on the importance of protecting the Belfast [Good Friday] Agreement."

U.S. State Department deputy spokesperson Vedant Patel reiterated the U.S. position on the Northern Ireland peace accord Tuesday. The "U.S. priority remains protecting the gains of the Belfast Good Friday Agreement and preserving peace and stability and prosperity for the people of Northern Ireland," he said.

Original Article

Oz and Toomey Call Upon Fetterman to Debate in Pa. Senate Race

Oz and Toomey Call Upon Fetterman to Debate in Pa. Senate Race Oz and Toomey Call Upon Fetterman to Debate in Pa. Senate Race (AP)

MARC LEVY Tuesday, 06 September 2022 07:28 PM EDT

Republican Senate candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz teamed up with U.S. Sen. Pat Toomey on Tuesday to publicly call on his Democratic rival, John Fetterman, to participate in a debate in their high-profile Pennsylvania race.

Oz and Toomey, holding a news conference in Philadelphia, also questioned Fetterman's fitness for office and criticized his reluctance to speak with reporters since suffering a stroke in May. Fetterman has been sidelined for most of the summer while recovering, though he did appear Monday with President Joe Biden at a Labor Day parade in Pittsburgh and has spoken briefly at a number of events.

“What happens if a U.S. senator in an important state like Pennsylvania is elected, never having answered a legitimate question from a voter, from a newscaster … in a debate stage?” Oz said. “What would that mean for future campaigns around the country?"

Fetterman’s campaign countered Tuesday that Oz's insistence on a debate is “about mocking John for having a stroke" and maintained that Fetterman's doctor says he should be able to campaign and serve in the Senate without a problem.

“Anyone who’s seen John speak knows that while he’s still recovering, he’s more capable of fighting for PA than Dr. Oz will ever be,” Fetterman's campaign said in a statement.

The news conference with Toomey — the retiring senator both candidates are vying to replace — signals Oz's increasing aggressiveness in taking on Fetterman as the celebrity heart surgeon seeks to make up ground in polls with just nine weeks to go until Election Day. Democrats see the race as one of their best chances nationally to flip a Republican-held seat, and the winner could help decide the chamber’s partisan control next year.

Fetterman has only given three media interviews since suffering the stroke and has held no news conferences. He has acknowledged that he has diminished auditory processing speed — he cannot always respond quickly to what he's hearing — and conducted all three interviews by video, with real-time closed captions. Fetterman, in brief public speaking events, also has struggled to speak fluidly.

Oz, who has been endorsed by former President Donald Trump, has accused Fetterman of lying about the seriousness of the effects of the stroke. Fetterman’s campaign says he is not lying and is willing to debate, but they want a debate that can accommodate the lingering effects of his stroke. A campaign spokesperson declined to elaborate on what that might require.

Roughly a dozen news organizations and other groups have reached out to the campaigns about hosting a debate, Fetterman’s campaign has said.

Oz has touted his willingness to join five. The first one, proposed by Pittsburgh TV station KDKA, would have taken place Tuesday night. Fetterman's campaign told the station that Tuesday night didn't work.

The station’s news director, Shawn Hoder, said KDKA is still willing to host a televised debate at a later date and is awaiting word from Fetterman's campaign on when that might be. The station would need about two weeks’ notice to make a debate happen, Hoder said.

Besides any health concerns, political strategists suggest Fetterman could also be wanting to avoid a debate — or push it as late as possible in the campaign — because he is ahead in polls. Leading candidates often believe they have less incentive to join a debate and risk their opponent scoring points, especially considering Oz is a former TV show host.

“You have a whole heck of a lot more to lose, especially if you're John Fetterman standing on a stage two, three, four, five times with a guy who spent his life on television,” said Michael Manzo, a Harrisburg-based lobbyist and former Democratic campaign strategist. “It's almost a no-win situation for Fetterman.”

Fetterman's campaign did not respond to a request for comment on any strategy for avoiding or delaying a debate.

In any case, because candidates can communicate with voters through social media, debates are simply not as important as they used to be, or as substantive, said Mark Nevins, a Philadelphia-based Democratic campaign strategist.

In the Democratic primary, before he suffered the stroke, Fetterman skipped a couple of candidate forums, earning criticism from his rivals. But he also joined a couple other forums where — as the perceived front-runner in polls — he was the primary subject of attacks.

In particular, rivals went after Fetterman over a 2013 incident when he was mayor of small-town Braddock in western Pennsylvania and, shotgun in hand, confronted an unarmed Black man because he suspected the man was involved in gunfire nearby. Police didn't file charges against Fetterman or the other man in the matter.

In Pennsylvania’s last four U.S. Senate contests, debates have not been a major feature. All the debates took place in mid- to late October, with two debates in each race — except for 2012′s contest, which had one debate.

Toomey — who won in 2010 and 2016 — said that if Fetterman is being honest about his condition, then he should debate Oz.

“If John Fetterman were elected to the Senate and he’s not able to communicate effectively, if he’s not able to engage with the press, if he’s not able to engage with his colleagues, he would not be able to do the job," Toomey said. “It’s just not possible to be an effective senator if you cannot communicate. It’s just the essence of the job.”

Original Article

Dershowitz to Newsmax: DOJ Has ‘No Case’ to Block Trump Special Master Ruling

Dershowitz to Newsmax: DOJ Has 'No Case' to Block Trump Special Master Ruling

By Jay Clemons | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 07:01 PM EDT

Alan Dershowitz, a professor emeritus at Harvard Law School and one of the country's most renowned constitutional experts, found it laughable that The New York Times, citing a recent piece, couldn't locate a single academic who favored the Trump team's request for a special master — amid the legal battle between the Department of Justice and former President Donald Trump.

"I'm an academic, and I'm in favor of [the special master appointment]," Dershowitz told Newsmax on Tuesday's "Spicer & Co." with hosts Sean Spicer and Lyndsay Keith.

"I guarantee you one thing: If this were President Hillary Clinton, or former President Hillary Clinton, and she had a search like this, and the judge — who was a Democrat — had appointed a special master, virtually every one of those academics would be applauding this," said Dershowitz, who was a member of Trump's impeachment defense team.

"It is hypocrisy, and [the academics] failed the 'shoe-on-the-other-foot' test, and no one should take them seriously," Dershowitz said.

It's worth noting that in many of his Newsmax appearances, Dershowitz has disclosed that he didn't vote for Trump in the 2016 or 2020 presidential elections.

That aside, Dershowitz — who is promoting his book "The Price of Principle" — still values the equal application of rule of law at every turn.

It's always about fairness, he added.

"I just think this [the latest special master pushback is] part of the 'Get Trump' mentality among experts and aggregates who are academics," Dershowitz said. "They just apply different rules to Trump."

Dershowitz also has a firm allegiance to attorney-client privilege, whether it involves a past U.S. president, a future contender for the nation's highest office or an ordinary citizen.

"The DOJ cannot judge itself," in terms of gauging which materials seized from the FBI's Aug. 8 search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort warrant attorney-client protections, said Dershowitz, before adding, "Who will guard the guardians?"

Regarding the special master request, Dershowitz declared that DOJ and the FBI "have no case" in terms of overturning U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon's Monday ruling.

Down the line, however, DOJ could succeed in preserving President Joe Biden's October 2021 decision to waive executive privilege regarding Trump — or any other president, past or present.

And if that decision holds, Dershowitz said it would have far-reaching consequences with future administrations.

If Biden's executive-privilege decision sticks, Dershowitz rhetorically wondered, "what chance do we ever have of another president confiding in their chief of staff, if that president" knows that everything will become public anyway.

"If you're going to have executive privilege, it has to survive the incumbency of a certain president," regardless of political party affiliation, Dershowitz said. "It has to be like lawyer-client privilege. … Executive privileges cannot be terminated by an adversary [Biden]. … Here, you have an adversary [Trump], the man that's going to run against you" as president in 2024.

"It makes no sense at all," he said.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Rep. Norman to Newsmax: Biden’s Speech Not Presidential

Rep. Norman to Newsmax: Biden's Speech Not Presidential (Newsmax/"The Chris Salcedo Show")

By Nick Koutsobinas | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 06:16 PM EDT

South Carolina Republican Rep. Ralph Norman decried on Newsmax President Joe Biden's Philadelphia speech in front of Independence Hall as not presidential.

Speaking on "The Chris Salcedo Show" Tuesday about Biden's speech, Norman says, "Joe Biden did what he always does, which is use his voice to basically lambaste anybody that voted for President Trump. His hatred is that big."

"It was an embarrassment, and as the president of the United States, you would think in these dark times he would have an uplifting speech: one of hope and one of coming together. After all, he's supposed to be the president that provides unity; he's doing anything but that. And the economy and everything he touches has been derailed for the last 19-20 months."

"So, it's not anything new, but America deserves better than this rhetoric he's putting out," Norman added.

According to a Convention of States/Trafalgar poll, roughly 57% of respondents agree Biden's speech "represents a dangerous escalation in rhetoric and is designed to incite conflict amongst Americans."

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Hillary Fires Back at Trump Comparisons

Hillary Fires Back at Trump Comparisons Hillary Fires Back at Trump Comparisons Hillary Clinton attends the Netflix film "White Noise" and opening ceremony red carpet at the 79th Venice International Film Festival on August 31, 2022 in Venice, Italy. (Andreas Rentz/Getty Images for Netflix)

By Jack Gournell | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 06:02 PM EDT

Hillary Clinton on Tuesday fired back at critics, including former President Donald Trump, who have compared her infamous "deleted emails" to the documents with classified markings found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago home by the FBI this summer.

"I can’t believe we’re still talking about this, but my emails," Clinton posted in a Twitter thread. "As Trump’s problems continue to mount, the right is trying to make this about me again. There’s even a 'Clinton Standard.' The fact is that I had zero emails that were classified."

Then-FBI Director James "Comey admitted he was wrong after he claimed I had classified emails," she continued. "Trump’s own State Department, under two different Secretaries, found I had no classified emails. That's right: ZERO."

"By contrast," Clinton said, "Trump has hundreds of documents clearly marked classified, and the investigation just started."

While Clinton is correct on her claims about Trump, the former president and his legal team say he declassified the documents en masse as he left the White House on January 20, 2020.

Still, Trump critics and many legals experts say that while Trump had the power to declassify some documents, some were beyond his legal authority to declassify. Plus, they say, a proper process must be followed, and he isn't allowed to take them to his private residence since they belong to the American people and not to him. Clinton's claims that she was found to have had no classified emails are not quite accurate.

Politico reported, for instance, in October 2015, that at least one of the emails that Clinton sent to longtime friend Sidney Blumenthal from the server was deemed "classified" by the state department — and Blumenthal had no security clearance.

A July 5, 2016, Time story noted that Comey's FBI found that Clinton had been careless, but no criminal charges were pursued because she was not found to have acted with clear criminal intent.

Comey at the time said that Clinton and her aides were "extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

But what he recanted in an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos in April 2018 is the fact that he was "sloppy" in how he described how Clinton would not be charged. He never said that none of the documents were classified.

"I should've worked harder to find a way to convey that it's more than just the ordinary mistake, but it's not criminal behavior, and find different words to describe that," Comey said in the interview.

Original Article

‘Classified’ Docs May Complicate Finding Trump Case Special Master

'Classified' Docs May Complicate Finding Trump Case Special Master Documents from Mar-a-Lago Documents from Mar-a-Lago. (AP)

By Jay Clemons | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 05:33 PM EDT

The intrigue over which legal expert gets named "special master" for the battle between former President Donald Trump and the Department of Justice (DOJ) could soon reach a new strata of national scrutiny.

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon granted the Trump team's request for a special master to be brought in to provide an independent review of the supposedly "classified" or "top-secret" materials seized from the FBI's Aug. 8 raid of Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort.

The special master will likely decide which documents — which Trump reportedly stored in a secure location at his Florida home — are protected by attorney-client privilege, or executive privilege, via declassification.

According to Newsweek, special masters are typically attorneys or retired judges. They also review materials that might fall under attorney-client protections.

"You can't come in and be a judge or a special master with an agenda or really kind of wanting one side to win, you need to look at all the facts and the evidence and what the parties are arguing, and apply the law to the facts and come out to what the right result is regardless of who is appearing before you," David Cohen, a special master who serves in federal cases, told NPR this week.

From Cohen's standpoint, the primary qualification of any special master is someone who "can remain neutral."

Cannon may have final say on the special master selection, but the DOJ and Trump's legal team have until Friday to submit filings that include a list of potential candidates.

Mathew Miller, lawyer and former Director of the Office of Public Affairs at the DOJ tweeted on Monday:

"So all Judge Cannon has to do now is find a special master who: a. is an expert in one of the more contested, unexplored areas of the law; b. already has a Top Secret clearance; c. isn't seen as tainted through service in a recent administration. Good luck."

Per Cannon's Monday ruling, the DOJ was obliged to stop using any of the materials seized from Trump's home as part of the criminal investigation into the alleged mishandling of classified documents — until the special master's review has been completed.

While appearing on Newsmax last week, Trump attorney Alina Habba told "Spicer & Co." the ongoing circus involving Trump's stored documents has become more absurd.

Habba says the Presidential Records Act gives Trump — and every other U.S. president, past and present — the authority to declassify documents while holding office.

And by all accounts, Habba says Trump's team of Florida attorneys had been fully cooperating with the National Archives department.

"So, it was a bit of surprise, you can imagine, when the [FBI] raid happened," says Habba.

Original Article

Newsmax Beats Fox With Trump Rally Ratings

Newsmax Beats Fox With Trump Rally Ratings Newsmax Beats Fox With Trump Rally Ratings

By Jack Gournell | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 05:27 PM EDT

Newsmax’s live coverage of former President Trump’s Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania rally on Saturday beat Fox News in total impressions — even though Newsmax is in 25 million fewer cable homes.

In the same time period Newsmax also crushed CNN and MSNBC, pulling in more than 21% combined.

In his first rally since the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago home, Trump pulled no punches, firing back at President Joe Biden's own speech earlier in the week from Philadelphia, calling it "divisive" and saying that Biden and the Justice Department are the true "enemies of the people" — not him and his supporters as Biden said in his speech.

Trump also offered support to Senate candidate Dr. Mehmet Oz and gubernatorial candidate Doug Mastriano, both of whom he endorsed in the GOP primaries.

Coverage of the speech aired from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. EDT ranked in the top 3 in the time period among all basic cable behind only ESPN and the Hallmark Channel. It drew a total of 1.9 million viewers for the full event, 1.7 million for the speech itself, and ranked No. 8 among viewers ages 35-64.

More than 1 million viewers were watching the speech at any one time.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Newsmax Beats Fox News in Ratings During Trump Rally

Newsmax Beats Fox News in Ratings During Trump Rally Newsmax Beats Fox News in Ratings During Trump Rally (AP)

By Jack Gournell | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 09:14 PM EDT

Newsmax’s live coverage of former President Trump’s Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, rally on Saturday beat Fox News in key ratings, according to Nielsen.

Newsmax was the third most watched cable network during the Trump rally speech, with an audience so large it even surpassed the combined ratings of CNN and MSNBC, pulling in more than 21% of both networks.

Nielsen also reported that Newsmax had a total audience of 1.7 million viewers during Trump’s speech, with its overall coverage drawing over 1.9 million viewers.

Newsmax had more than 1.03 million viewers at minute during the Trump speech, with Fox News drawing just 942,000 viewers during the same time period.

The Newsmax ratings were even more impressive considering the network is carried in 20 million less homes than Fox News, but still outpaced the cable giant.

During the rally, CNN only reported 406,000 viewers, and MSNBC 444,000.

In his first rally since the FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago home, Trump pulled no punches, firing back at President Joe Biden's own speech earlier in the week from Philadelphia.

Trump called Biden’s speech "divisive," saying that Biden and the Justice Department are the true "enemies of the people."

Trump also offered support to Republican candidates Dr. Mehmet Oz and Doug Mastriano, both of whom he endorsed in the GOP primaries.

Coverage of the speech aired from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. ET and Newsmax ranked in the top 3 in the time period among all basic cable behind only ESPN and the Hallmark Channel.

About NEWSMAX TV:

NEWSMAX is the fastest-growing cable news channel in America!

Original Article

Oz Says He Wouldn’t Have Impeached Trump, Would’ve Certified Election

Oz Says He Wouldn't Have Impeached Trump, Would've Certified Election Mehmet Oz Dr. Mehmet Oz. (Getty Images)

By Luca Cacciatore | Tuesday, 06 September 2022 04:29 PM EDT

Dr. Mehmet Oz told a news conference on Tuesday alongside incumbent Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., that he would have voted against removing former President Donald Trump from office.

However, as the Republican nominee for the seat Toomey is vacating, Oz confirmed that he still would have certified President Joe Biden's victory in the controversial 2020 presidential election.

"I would not have objected to it," Oz said of the official election results. "By the time the delegates and those reports were sent to the U.S. Senate, our job was to approve it, which is what I would have done."

Oz later clarified that he did not see a reason for affirming the Democratic-controlled House's impeachment, which would have removed Trump from office, for the then-president's actions in and around the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

"I would not have voted in favor of impeaching President Trump. I think the President was already leaving office by then," Oz said. Toomey was one of seven Republican Senators who supported removing Trump at the time.

His seemingly lukewarm position on the events surrounding Jan. 6 and the second impeachment of Trump is in stark contrast to the former president himself — who has continued to make the two issues central to his endorsements.

Oz himself was endorsed by Trump in the heated Republican primary for the seat to potentially succeed Toomey, referring to him as "popular, respected, and smart," according to a statement.

The Republican nominee's Democratic opponent in November is Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, who currently leads him by 6.5 percentage points in a RealClearPolitics average of polls conducted this cycle.

Original Article